On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:02:23 +0200
Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2003 5:58 am, Kent West wrote:
>
> > Wonderful goal! But what you're asking for is a different distribution,
> > which has been done already: Corel, Libranet, Knoppix, Xandros, etc.
>
> What bothe
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 8:35 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Knoppix doesn't. Granted, the only transparent way of transitioning
> is to sid, but still.
Still it's not totally transparent. Some problems exists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please turn your line wraps down to 72 columns
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> > Wonderful goal! But what you're asking for is a different distribution,
> > which has been done already: Corel, Libranet, Knoppix, Xandr
alex wrote:
Alfredo Valles wrote:
Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having
a quick desktop installation?
Why not to release a basic knoppix-like CD with the most common
desktop applications that 99% of people would want?.
Amen!
Whover produced KNOPPIX has
On Tuesday 26 Aug 2003 9:53 am, alex wrote:
> Alfredo Valles wrote:
> >I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
> >
> >Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having a
> > quick desktop installation?
> >
> >Why not to release a basic knoppix-l
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 5:58 am, Kent West wrote:
> Wonderful goal! But what you're asking for is a different distribution,
> which has been done already: Corel, Libranet, Knoppix, Xandros, etc.
What bothers me about these distros is that even if they are debian based you
can not upgrade trans
Alfredo Valles wrote:
I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having a quick
desktop installation?
Why not to release a basic knoppix-like CD with the most common desktop
applications that 99% of p
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 7:23 am, Stephane wrote:
> Le Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:39:08 +0200
>
> It seems that a lot of people have troubles with the Debian installer.
> Once you know it well it can do what you want: tasksel is simple,
> dselect is powerful. Refuse to use them and you have a very minima
On Tuesday 26 Aug 2003 12:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >It seems that a lot of people have troubles with the Debian installer.
> >Once you know it well it can do what you want: tasksel is simple,
> >dselect is powerful. Refuse to use them and you have a very minimal
> >system that you can tune
It seems that a lot of people have troubles with the Debian installer.
Once you know it well it can do what you want: tasksel is simple,
dselect is powerful. Refuse to use them and you have a very minimal
system that you can tune a lot.
the minimal system thing and the opportunity to do what you w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:39:08PM +0200, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> Why not to release a basic knoppix-like CD with the most common desktop
> applications that 99% of people would want?
Why do that when Knoppix already fills that niche and debian-insta
Le Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:39:08 +0200
Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
Hello,
> I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
It seems that a lot of people have troubles with the Debian installer.
Once you know it well it can do what you want: tasksel is simple
Alfredo Valles wrote:
I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having a quick
desktop installation?
I know that this wouldn't work in all platforms (most surely only in x86) but
even if it is a
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:11:40 +0200
Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2003 2:49 am, Johann Koenig wrote:
> > Hmm .. that sounds just like Knoppix! Why, that already exists!
>
> I'm just saying that the system is good and that it works, not that
> it's original or tha
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:39, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
>
> Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having a quick
> desktop installation?
"Debian" is a group of people who volunteer their time. Why don
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:39:08 +0200
Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not to release a basic knoppix-like CD with the most common
> desktop applications that 99% of people would want?. Using a very
> basic installer and the hardware auto-detection of knoppix (or any
> other that works
I know this have been discussed many times. But I still not happy. (Sorry)
Why is it that debian can not take a shortcut in the path for having a quick
desktop installation?
Why not to release a basic knoppix-like CD with the most common desktop
applications that 99% of people would want?. Usin
17 matches
Mail list logo
