Previously Max wrote:
> I noticed that the latest version of ssh in potato introduced PAM
> support and totally screwed up ssh for me. It created an
> /etc/pam.d/ssh file with the following contents:
Oops, my mistake. I just uploaded ssh 1.2.26-1.4 which fixes this
problem and the wrong permissio
* George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04/23/99 17:20] wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Max wrote:
> > > > anyone know how to configure it?
> > >
> > > edit /etc/pwdb.conf I believe
> >
> > OK, I just had to add nis to the entries in pwdb.conf.
>
> Can you share with us what that nis entry looks like
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 07:49:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 04:42:45PM -0700, Max wrote:
> > I noticed that the latest version of ssh in potato introduced PAM
> > support and totally screwed up ssh for me. It created an
> > /etc/pam.d/ssh file with the following contents
* Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04/23/99 16:49] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 04:42:45PM -0700, Max wrote:
> > I noticed that the latest version of ssh in potato introduced PAM
> > support and totally screwed up ssh for me. It created an
> > /etc/pam.d/ssh file with the following contents:
>
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 04:42:45PM -0700, Max wrote:
> I noticed that the latest version of ssh in potato introduced PAM
> support and totally screwed up ssh for me. It created an
> /etc/pam.d/ssh file with the following contents:
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth required pam_pwdb.so shadow
> auth
I noticed that the latest version of ssh in potato introduced PAM
support and totally screwed up ssh for me. It created an
/etc/pam.d/ssh file with the following contents:
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_pwdb.so shadow
auth required pam_nologin.so
accountrequired pam_pwdb.
6 matches
Mail list logo