On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 21:40, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.06.2214 +0200]:
> > Your note on the use of psql suggests that somehow SSL is the
> > default access method on your machine. That does not happen for
> > me, adn I don't know what in your
also sprach Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.06.2214 +0200]:
> So it seems that pam_pgsql is choosing to use SSL to connect to
> the PostgreSQL server.
Weird! It does link against libssl, so you may be right. Apparently
though, it doesn't implement SSL right...
> Your note on the use o
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:01, martin f krafft wrote:
...
> All in all, this make pam_pgsql pretty unusable, and I don't really
> know why. I have never told it to use SSL, and that's where the
> errors seem to come from. Postgres allows cleartext access:
>
> /etc/postgres/pg_hba.conf:
> hosta
I am trying to integrate a passwd/shadow table from an SQL database
into a cluster of Debian systems. There are a number of users
defined in the SQL database, way too many to allow for the standard
flatfile /etc/passwd. So I'd like to combine the two authorization
mechanisms and use the best of bot
4 matches
Mail list logo
