On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 16:47:43 (-0500), Charles Zeitler wrote:
> so, is displaying partitions of all drives normal behavior for
> parted --list /dev/sdb ?
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 12:02 AM Charles Zeitler wrote:
> > i'm working on a thumb drive to use it as install media.
> > su -c 'parted
hanks, all.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 12:02 AM Charles Zeitler wrote:
>
> i'm working on a thumb drive to use it as install media.
> su -c 'parted --list /dev/sdb' (/dev/sdb is thumb drive}
> lists partitions from /dev/sda 9system drive)
> even when /dev/sdb doesn't exist!
>
> fdisk -l /dev/sdb
On 2020-09-27 at 17:47, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> so, is displaying partitions of all drives normal behavior for
> parted --list /dev/sdb ?
It's normal behavior for 'parted --list'.
The '--list' option to parted doesn't take an argument. The '/dev/sdb'
is being ignored.
As indicated by Thomas
so, is displaying partitions of all drives normal behavior for
parted --list /dev/sdb ?
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 12:02 AM Charles Zeitler wrote:
>
> i'm working on a thumb drive to use it as install media.
> su -c 'parted --list /dev/sdb' (/dev/sdb is thumb drive}
> lists partitions from /dev/sda
On Sb, 26 sep 20, 00:02:57, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> i'm working on a thumb drive to use it as install media.
> su -c 'parted --list /dev/sdb' (/dev/sdb is thumb drive}
How did you determine that /dev/sdb is the thumb drive?
> lists partitions from /dev/sda 9system drive)
> even when /dev/sdb
i'm working on a thumb drive to use it as install media.
su -c 'parted --list /dev/sdb' (/dev/sdb is thumb drive}
lists partitions from /dev/sda 9system drive)
even when /dev/sdb doesn't exist!
fdisk -l /dev/sdb properly reports it as missing,
and gparted seems to be unconfused.
so far google
6 matches
Mail list logo
