partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, I have just build a machine, and am ready to start putting the stable on it. This is the first time I have built one from scratch, and it has made me think in detail about what I am doing as I put it all together. Now as I am newish to Linux I thought you might indulge me her. On two other

partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, I have just build a machine, and am ready to start putting the stable on it. This is the first time I have built one from scratch, and it has made me think in detail about what I am doing as I put it all together. Now as I am newish to Linux I thought you might indulge me her. On two other

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Sebastiaan
High, On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Keith O'Connell wrote: Hi, I have just build a machine, and am ready to start putting the stable on it. This is the first time I have built one from scratch, and it has made me think in detail about what I am doing as I put it all together. Now as I am newish to

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread George Karaolides
My $0.02's worth re. swap: Suppose you are consistently using 256MB of swap on your fairly up-to-date machine. That means you definitely need to buy and install 256MB RAM, which is dirt cheap today. Therefore, I think on a modern machine, the swap space should be equal to the minimum amount

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:00:03AM +0100, Keith O'Connell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 1: I recently read that logical partitions were better than primary because of the size limits on the directories. I didn't quit understand this. On this laptop I have 4 primary partitions, with the 4th

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Jimmy Richards
Hi Keith, I will try and help as best I can with some of these questions, and more! First, I would like to recommend that you read the partitioning how-to at http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Partition/partition-4.html On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:00:03AM +0100, Keith

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Jimmy Richards
Oh, A couple things I wanted to include that I forgot. Just thought I would let you know that I have 512 MB's of ram and felt that I wouldn't be using swap very much, so I made my swap partition 256 MB. And, in case it's of any help, here is some info about my layout. I just made

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Mike Pfleger
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:02:57AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: SNIP - Swapping sucks. - Running out of memory sucks more. - Repartitioning sucks most. There's also a lot of obsolete data floating around about GNU/Linux in general. I have a question that seems appropriate here. In

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Josh McKinney
On approximately Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:22:57PM -0700, Mike Pfleger wrote: that are AFAIK not yet fixed? If this has been fixed, please let me know as I have been checking the changelogs at kernel.org, and seen no mention of swap issues being addressed in the last little while. Check out

Re: partitioning revisited

2001-08-09 Thread Mike Pfleger
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:45:24PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote: SNIP Check out the latest ac kernel and the latest linus kernel also. Linus has been working on vm balancing as a top priority recently and the latest ac has a patch to fix the swap=2*ram thing. Josh That's cool; Ill go and