On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 02:36:35PM +0200, Kerstin Hoef-Emden wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, John Stevenson wrote:
>
> > /usr/local/lib /usr/local/lbin are the apps/libraries that are specific to
> > one
> > machine, i.e. an application that is installed but is not part of the debian
>
April 13, 2000 12:19 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: paths (/usr/this, /usr/that)
>
>
> my 2.1 cd installed a great deal of stuff under /usr/doc,
> and the new potato (i.e. 'apt-get upgrade', with
> /etc/apt/sources.list pointing to 'froze
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, John Stevenson wrote:
> /usr/local/lib /usr/local/lbin are the apps/libraries that are specific to one
> machine, i.e. an application that is installed but is not part of the debian
> distribution
What about /opt?
Regards,
Kerstin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A very simplistic (and rough) answer would be:
/lib /bin are to do with the real core of unix/linux, like the kernel modules
live in
/lib/modules
/usr/lib /usr/bin are the applications/libraries that run on top of the core
unix/linux, things that the users make use of, hence '/usr'
/usr/local/
w trillich wrote:
>my 2.1 cd installed a great deal of stuff under /usr/doc,
>and the new potato (i.e. 'apt-get upgrade', with
>/etc/apt/sources.list pointing to 'frozen') puts bunches
>of stuff in /usr/share/doc.
>
>what's the functional or intellectual distinction:
> /lib
>
w trillich wrote:
>
> my 2.1 cd installed a great deal of stuff under /usr/doc,
> and the new potato (i.e. 'apt-get upgrade', with
> /etc/apt/sources.list pointing to 'frozen') puts bunches
> of stuff in /usr/share/doc.
>
> what's the functional or intellectual distinction:
> /lib
>
my 2.1 cd installed a great deal of stuff under /usr/doc,
and the new potato (i.e. 'apt-get upgrade', with
/etc/apt/sources.list pointing to 'frozen') puts bunches
of stuff in /usr/share/doc.
what's the functional or intellectual distinction:
/lib
/usr/lib
/usr/local/lib
7 matches
Mail list logo
