On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I was wanting to compile the gcc source package from potato under
slink.
My suggestion is that unless you really *need* the packaged version you
shouldn't bother - it's not even the standard version of any Debian
package
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:21:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[suggestion to build stock egcs/pgcc in /usr/local]
Okay, might do that.
I recently updated one of my testing machines to Potato, and the patched
gcc seems to be working fine.
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:41:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:21:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently updated one of my testing machines to Potato, and the patched
gcc seems to be working fine.
Has anyone successfully patched and compiled a pgcc/egcs package for
Slink? I was able to patch for Potato using the gcc source package and a
slightly older gcc source tarball patched with the pgcc patches.
I recently updated one of my testing machines to Potato, and the patched
gcc seems to be
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:21:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone successfully patched and compiled a pgcc/egcs package for
Slink? I was able to patch for Potato using the gcc source package and a
slightly older gcc source tarball patched with the pgcc patches.
I've not built
5 matches
Mail list logo