On Thu, 01 Jul 1999 19:53:11 -0700, Nate wrote:
>Is there anything wrong with the following rule?
>
>ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 192.168.1.4 http -R 192.168.1.1 http
You should invoke it as "-L www -R www"
It probably doesn't matter whether you use "www" or "http," both are in
/etc/services
Hi Folks!
I decided to upgrade my firewall to the 2.2.x series so that I could
take advantage of the advanced networking capabilities (ipmasqadm).
Masquerading is working fine, but port forwarding isn't.
Is there anything wrong with the following rule?
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 192.168.1.4
2 matches
Mail list logo
