"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> > pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> > well.
> >
>
> dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
Ju
>
> Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> well.
>
dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
..
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan K. Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:23 PM
> To: Debian-User Mailing List
> Subject: pump replacing dhcpcd?
>
>
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump
> package,
On 13-Sep-2000 Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump package, one of
> the things that the page tells me is:
>
> "This is the DHCP/BOOTP client written by RedHat. This replaces the dhcpcd
> package."
>
> I take this to mean that the dhcpcd client
When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump package, one of
the things that the page tells me is:
"This is the DHCP/BOOTP client written by RedHat. This replaces the dhcpcd
package."
I take this to mean that the dhcpcd client is no longer be worked on? The
reason I ask is th
5 matches
Mail list logo
