Re: quake-svga signal 11

2000-02-04 Thread Remco van 't Veer
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 14:09, aphro wrote: another thing to check is the cache on the board/chip, disable one at a time thru the bios and see if it does the same, its gonna run like a 386 but it'll be a decent test to see if the cache sometimes gives bad hits. worth a shot anyways ... I

quake-svga signal 11

2000-02-03 Thread Remco van 't Veer
Hi, I've been having memory trouble.. A month ago I go new computer (a PIII450 with 3*128Mb). One SDRAM modules was broken, the machine didn't pass the kernel compile test. So I swapped till I found the broken one and traded it for a new one. This configuratie passes a 1000 kernel compile

Re: quake-svga signal 11

2000-02-03 Thread aphro
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Remco van 't Veer wrote: rwvtve Could it be a quake-svga problem or am I still experiencing memory rwvtve problems? Could my video memory be faulty? Some BIOS setting? quite possibly a quake-svga problem. it also could be a mainboard problem..is the ram that you scanned

Re: quake-svga signal 11

2000-02-03 Thread Remco van 't Veer
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:30, aphro wrote: quite possibly a quake-svga problem. it also could be a mainboard problem..is the ram that you scanned that was 'bad' in any particular socket? i've had ram sockets go bad on me before when the ram was ok. I cycled my good SDRAM's through all

Re: quake-svga signal 11

2000-02-03 Thread aphro
another thing to check is the cache on the board/chip, disable one at a time thru the bios and see if it does the same, its gonna run like a 386 but it'll be a decent test to see if the cache sometimes gives bad hits. worth a shot anyways ... nate On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Remco van 't Veer wrote: