Hello,
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:42:15 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
I don't want to offend you, but all that you wrote I already
found from google and friends.
... But I can make some educated guesses. For example, here's an excerpt
from my /var/log/installer/partman
Hello,
recently I wiped out all but one partition tables by stupidness and hasty
reading ...
Thanks to testdisk, most of the damage is already fixed.
There are 2 drives, that testdisk could not find the partion informations for.
Accidently I discovered /var/log/installer/partman, which looks
Am Samstag, 26. März 2011 schrieb Geronimo:
Hello,
recently I wiped out all but one partition tables by stupidness and hasty
reading ...
Thanks to testdisk, most of the damage is already fixed.
There are 2 drives, that testdisk could not find the partion informations
for. Accidently I
Hello,
thank your for your assistance.
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. März 2011 schrieb Geronimo:
Can anybody please shine me a light, how to patch the partition tables
with informations from that file, so it might be possible to gain access
to data ...
maybe you can fix it,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 06:37:44 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
recently I wiped out all but one partition tables by stupidness and hasty
reading ...
Thanks to testdisk, most of the damage is already fixed.
There are 2 drives, that testdisk could not find the partion informations for.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:59:20 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
Not sure about fdisk. Does fdisk write partition table entry only?
... or does it have side effects on existing data - like wiping out
superblock
of existing fs, so you have to format the partition?
I don't want to increase the
Am Samstag, 26. März 2011 schrieb Geronimo:
Hello,
thank your for your assistance.
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. März 2011 schrieb Geronimo:
Can anybody please shine me a light, how to patch the partition tables
with informations from that file, so it might be possible to
Hello,
thank you all for your attention and assistance.
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 06:37:44 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
That logfile looks like having reasonable partition informations of all
drives.
Can anybody please shine me a light, how to patch the partition tables
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:36:08 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
I'm a bit confused.
I tried to read partition info from hex-dump of first block and compare that
with the values from /var/log/installer/partman ...
According to partition info from wiki the biggest number of chs is 0x3FF,
Hello,
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:36:08 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
I'm a bit confused.
I tried to read partition info from hex-dump of first block and compare
that with the values from /var/log/installer/partman ...
According to partition info from wiki the
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Geronimo wrote:
Can anybody please shine me a light, how to patch the partition tables
with informations from that file, so it might be possible to gain
access to data ...
This may not be what you are looking for, but if your aim is to get the
partition table back, did
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:42:15 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote:
I don't want to offend you, but all that you wrote I already
found from google and friends.
What I did not find is some info about partman logging.
Searching debian MLs for partman has millions of hits,
so its the same like no
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Geronimo wrote:
Hello,
thank your for your assistance.
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Samstag, 26. März 2011 schrieb Geronimo:
Can anybody please shine me a light, how to patch the partition tables
with informations from that file, so it might be
13 matches
Mail list logo
