Hi.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:33:34PM +0100, Bernard van de Koppel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to enable reiserfs for the various systems we are moving to
> buster.
>
> In the previous version ( the config for reiserfs was set to
> "CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m
Hi,
I would like to enable reiserfs for the various systems we are moving to
buster.
In the previous version ( the config for reiserfs was set to
"CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m" in /boot/config-3.16.0-4-amd64) in debian 8.11.
In Buster, this is set to "# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS is not set&q
Salve todos,
Tenho um servidor antigo com Debian e que possui algumas partições
reiserfs. Dentre elas o / e o /var. Este servidor sempre funcionou
assim, porém hoje o encontrei travado devido a uma pane na fonte, Ao
trocar o componente e ligá-lo novamente me deparei com esta mensagem
(Can't find
Salve todos,
Tenho um servidor antigo com Debian e que possui algumas partições
reiserfs. Dentre elas o / e o /var. Este servidor sempre funcionou
assim, porém hoje o encontrei travado devido a uma pane na fonte, Ao
trocar o componente e ligá-lo novamente me deparei com esta mensagem
(Can't find
Você checou o /etc/fstab para ver se as configurações das partições estão
corretas?
On Friday 09 August 2013 13:08:45 Welington Rodrigues Braga (Listas) wrote:
Salve todos,
Tenho um servidor antigo com Debian e que possui algumas partições
reiserfs. Dentre elas o / e o /var. Este servidor
.
3. Inserir os dados novamente.
Abraços.
Em 9 de agosto de 2013 12:07, Welington Rodrigues Braga
welrbr...@welrbraga.eti.br escreveu:
Salve todos,
Tenho um servidor antigo com Debian e que possui algumas partições
reiserfs. Dentre elas o / e o /var. Este servidor sempre funcionou
assim
[reiserfs]
[39339.910257] [8103f48f] ? try_to_wake_up+0x197/0x197
[39339.910275] [a01b73aa] ? do_journal_begin_r+0x193/0x252
[reiserfs]
[39339.910289] [810b5c31] ? find_get_pages+0x31/0xd4
[39339.910309] [a01b7522] ? journal_begin+0xb9/0xf2
[reiserfs]
[39339.910329
El dt 26 de 06 de 2012 a les 16:53 +0200, en/na a...@probeta.net va
escriure:
als sistemes d'arxius linux, reiserfs, xfs, ext2, etc etc
quin és millor? més segur i fiable? etc.
tots són bons o fiables, però precissament ReiserFS ... crec que es va
aturar el seu desenvolupament quan el seu
2012/6/27 Marc Olive marc.ol...@blauadvisors.com:
[...]
També vaig montar XFS, era per un cas concret d'un servidor per vendre música
en MP3, molts arxius de 10Mb per cançó (teres d'MP3 en alta calitat), però no
es portava gens bé amb el Gluster que hi havia montat (un raid de HDs en
xarxa).
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 15:18:09 Adrià wrote:
2012/6/27 Marc Olive marc.ol...@blauadvisors.com:
[...]
També vaig montar XFS, era per un cas concret d'un servidor per vendre
música en MP3, molts arxius de 10Mb per cançó (teres d'MP3 en alta
calitat), però no es portava gens bé amb el
2012/6/27 Marc Olive marc.ol...@blauadvisors.com:
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 15:18:09 Adrià wrote:
2012/6/27 Marc Olive marc.ol...@blauadvisors.com:
[...]
També vaig montar XFS, era per un cas concret d'un servidor per vendre
música en MP3, molts arxius de 10Mb per cançó (teres d'MP3
als sistemes d'arxius linux, reiserfs, xfs, ext2, etc etc
quin és millor? més segur i fiable? etc.
tots són bons o fiables, però precissament ReiserFS ... crec que es va
aturar el seu desenvolupament quan el seu autor, fa pocs anys, va
planificar i dur a terme l'assassinat de la seva dona. El
Hola, primer us voldria dir que en principi aquest correu era una
demanda d'informació respecte als sistemes d'arxius linux, reiserfs,
xfs, ext2, etc etc quin és millor? més segur i fiable? etc.
Però com que m'enrotllava molt, i ho continuo fent, només us faré una
pregunta: he llegit que debian
HD e dei um comando dmesg pra ver e
encontrei estas msgs:
*[1593134.42] ReiserFS: warning: is_leaf: free space seems wrong:
level=1, nr_items=39, free_space=4 rdkey*
*[1593134.44] ReiserFS: sda1: warning: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid
format found in block 5439499. Fsck?*
*[1593134.47
:
*[1593134.42] ReiserFS: warning: is_leaf: free space seems wrong:
level=1, nr_items=39, free_space=4 rdkey*
*[1593134.44] ReiserFS: sda1: warning: vs-5150: search_by_key:
invalid format found in block 5439499. Fsck?*
*[1593134.47] ReiserFS: sda1: warning: vs-13070:
reiserfs_read_locked_inode: i
compactar com o comando tar
ele começa mas logo em seguida para com um erro
*tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.*
De cara vi que podia ser um problema de HD e dei um comando dmesg pra ver
e encontrei estas msgs:
*[1593134.42] ReiserFS: warning: is_leaf: free space seems wrong:
level=1
com o comando tar
ele começa mas logo em seguida para com um erro
*tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.*
De cara vi que podia ser um problema de HD e dei um comando dmesg pra ver
e encontrei estas msgs:
*[1593134.42] ReiserFS: warning: is_leaf: free space seems wrong:
level=1
cara vi que podia ser um problema de HD e dei um comando dmesg pra ver
e encontrei estas msgs:
*[1593134.42] ReiserFS: warning: is_leaf: free space seems wrong:
level=1, nr_items=39, free_space=4 rdkey*
*[1593134.44] ReiserFS: sda1: warning: vs-5150: search_by_key:
invalid format found
Também fiquei uso ReiserFS nos meus servidores antigos, mas ainda acho
que o lance do Reiser ter colocado a mulher na mala atraiu a ira do povo
do SL k
Em 12-04-2012 17:03, Samir Patrice escreveu:
Valeu galera, vou seguir as orientações de vocês e depois posto os
resultados.
Em 12 de
El Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:38:42 -0500, Marcos Delgado escribió:
El día 4 de octubre de 2011 11:39, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
escribió:
El Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:34:25 -0400, ulises gonzalez horta escribió:
El modulo para el sistema de archivos reiserfs en debian 6 viene
desactivado por defecto
Hola
El modulo para el sistema de archivos reiserfs en debian 6 viene desactivado
por defecto en la instalaci'on, alquien sabe que par'ametro hay que pasar
para activarlo??
Gracias
--
Salu2
Ulinx
Administrador de redes
Ministerio de Finanzas y Precios
Linux
El Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:34:25 -0400, ulises gonzalez horta escribió:
El modulo para el sistema de archivos reiserfs en debian 6 viene
desactivado por defecto en la instalaci'on, alquien sabe que par'ametro
hay que pasar para activarlo??
Se puede activar desde el instalador.
Hay una opción en
El día 4 de octubre de 2011 11:39, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:
El Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:34:25 -0400, ulises gonzalez horta escribió:
El modulo para el sistema de archivos reiserfs en debian 6 viene
desactivado por defecto en la instalaci'on, alquien sabe que par'ametro
hay que pasar
such systems) from
ReiserFS to EXT3/4? Hans is in prison. Reiser4 still isn't in
mainline. The number of eyes currently on Reiser3 code can easily be
counted on one person's fingers and toes, maybe just fingers...
ReiserFS is a filesystem that I've been using since my first linux
On Sun, 08 May 2011 14:29:12 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/8/2011 7:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at
a random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem is not clean
when booting.
Despite the boot message
Hello,
Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at a
random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem is not clean when
booting.
Despite the boot message, there are no more indications of a filesystem
corruption and indeed, the system has been always being
On 5/8/2011 7:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at a
random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem is not clean when
booting.
Despite the boot message, there are no more indications of a filesystem
corruption and indeed
Bonjour,
J'ai des occurrences de ce message dans la syslog.
J'ai cherché à quoi ça pouvait correspondre mais il n'y a pas grand
chose de référencé par google là-dessus. La meilleure page que j'ai pu
trouver est http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg00329.html
mais il y a seulement une
escreveu:
De: Wendell Almeida wendell...@gmail.com
Assunto: ACL em Reiserfs
Para: Lista Debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Data: Terça-feira, 16 de Março de 2010, 18:28
Saudações a todos.
Tenho um grupo A e outro B, onde A tem acesso total (rwx)
ao diretório X e B tem acesso
.
##
# Gustavo V. Goulart #
# Rio de Janeiro - RJ#
# Linux Debian Etch #
##
--- Em ter, 16/3/10, Wendell Almeidawendell...@gmail.com escreveu:
De: Wendell Almeidawendell...@gmail.com
Assunto: ACL em Reiserfs
Para: Lista Debiandebian
Saudações a todos.
Tenho um grupo A e outro B, onde A tem acesso total (rwx) ao diretório X
e B tem acesso somente de leitura (r--).
Apliquei as permissões usando acls.
Um determinado usuário participa dos 2 grupos. Ele terá acesso somente
de leitura ou total a esse diretório?
Obrigado.
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
hello,
I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no write
access to /home.
It's mounted with rw options, reiserfs and it's encrypted from
/dev/mapper/dat-home.
After
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
hello,
I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no write
access to /home.
It's mounted with rw options, reiserfs and it's encrypted from
/dev/mapper/dat-home.
After
On Sunday 22 November 2009 02:16:46 Ogya Chief wrote:
One partition on my linux box with reiserfs is corrupt and I am trying to
get it fixed. I ran the following command: reiserfsck --rebuild-sb
/dev/sdb2.
Well, that was wrong. When dealing with ReiserFS, *ALWAYS* run reiserfsck
One partition on my linux box with reiserfs is corrupt and I am trying to get
it fixed. I ran the following command:
reiserfsck --rebuild-sb /dev/sdb2.
The report I got indicates that either I have a corrupt journal or I have
changed the start of the partition table editor.
It prompted me
Entendi,
vlw amigo.
2009/3/24 Fabiano Pires fabiano.pi...@gmail.com
2009/3/23 ..:: S.e.r.i.a.L ::.. skr...@gmail.com
Boa noite amigos,
Alguem saberia me explicar o que eh e pra que server esses 33MB reservado
qdo se formta um particao/disco em reiserfs?
Vlw.
--
[.]´s
Boa noite amigos,
Alguem saberia me explicar o que eh e pra que server esses 33MB reservado
qdo se formta um particao/disco em reiserfs?
Vlw.
--
[.]´s
..:: S.e.r.i.a.L ::..
2009/3/23 ..:: S.e.r.i.a.L ::.. skr...@gmail.com
Boa noite amigos,
Alguem saberia me explicar o que eh e pra que server esses 33MB reservado
qdo se formta um particao/disco em reiserfs?
Vlw.
--
[.]´s
..:: S.e.r.i.a.L ::..
Eu creio que seja o Journal. Outros sistemas com Journal (como
Hi
I have a machine running debian 3.1 (sarge) with kernel
2.6.8-3-686-smp. Today suddenly all proccess started to block an i get
this:
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel: REISERFS: panic (device sdb1):
journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel:
Jun
Hi
I have a machine with debian 3.1 (sarge) and kernel 2.6.8-3-686-smp.
Today suddenly al process started to block and i get this:
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel: REISERFS: panic (device sdb1):
journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel
Bonjour à tous,
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les performances
obtenues sont supérieures
J'ai lu un article comme quoi ReiserFS est déconseillé sur PC de
bureau et portable (utilisation du disque en permanence
Le 13/03/08, Jean-Paul Lacquement [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bonjour à tous,
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les performances
obtenues sont supérieures
J'ai lu un article comme quoi ReiserFS est déconseillé
Jean-Paul Lacquement a écrit :
Bonjour à tous,
Bonjour,
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les performances
obtenues sont supérieures
La première fois que j'ai formaté en reiserfs c'était pour gagner de
reiserfs, qui était installé par défaut sur
la pseudo-distrib elive, dont j'étais un grand fan au début. J'ai très vite
déchanté car elive c'est très très beau, mais pas grand-chose d'autre ;-)
Elive préconisait que reiserfs c'était mieux parce que blablabla.
Puis j'ai lu des articles contre, j'ai
Jean-Paul Lacquement écrivit :
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les performances
obtenues sont supérieures
J'ai lu un article comme quoi ReiserFS est déconseillé sur PC de
bureau et portable (utilisation du disque en
. Est-ce que le souci venait
vraiment du fait que c'était en ext3?
Non, l'origine du problème était les secteurs défectueux... mais c'est
le résultat du fsck qui m'a beaucoup surpris !
Au début je ne jurais que par le reiserfs, qui était installé par
défaut sur la pseudo-distrib elive, dont j'étais
Le 13/03/08, Yannick Palanque[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Jean-Paul Lacquement écrivit :
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les performances
obtenues sont supérieures
J'ai lu un article comme quoi ReiserFS est
Le 13/03/08, Hugues Larrive [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Non, l'origine du problème était les secteurs défectueux... mais c'est
le résultat du fsck qui m'a beaucoup surpris !
je prends note!
Je pense que reiserfs se comporte mieux, reste plus performant dans les
cas d'utilisation un peu
* Jean-Paul Lacquement [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-13 17:40:02 +0100] wrote :
Le 13/03/08, Yannick Palanque[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Jean-Paul Lacquement écrivit :
Depuis quelques années, j'utilise le système de fichiers REISERFS
(v3.6 de mémoire) y compris sur mon PC portable. Les
Edi Stojicevic, jeudi 13 mars 2008, 17:20:56 CET
[…]
ZFS a l'air prometteur aussi mais n'est pas encore
fonctionnel sous Linux.
Le problème de ZFS, c’est surtout sa licence qui l’empêche
d’être inclus dans le noyau. On ne pourra l’utiliser que par
le biais de fuse (à moins de le
Le 13/03/08, Sylvain Sauvage [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Le problème de ZFS, c'est surtout sa licence qui l'empêche
d'être inclus dans le noyau. On ne pourra l'utiliser que par
le biais de fuse (à moins de le réimplémenter totalement par
« salle blanche » (clean room implementing)).
Ce
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:22:40PM -0800, Joe Brenner wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
not be able to fix the damage and loses
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Joe Brenner wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
not be able to fix the damage and loses data.
I've been
Eu já recuperei dados de minha partição, depois de um acidente, com
esse utilitário
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
--
André O Moura
http://andrem.wordpress.com
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:47:29 +0900
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ext3 is best if you are dealing with a mixture of both and has the
added security factor of defaulting to Ext2 if it fails. Although I
have never had reason to find out.
I'm in the habit of using buggy and crash-prone hardware
, and they are mostly advantages over
Reiserfs and other non-ext2 systems, not advantages over ext2.
But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me about once a year,
unfortunately also yesterday evening. In such a case there is
nothing you can
(No
checksumming in journal) even sounds pretty frightening. The list
of advantages is very short, and they are mostly advantages over
Reiserfs and other non-ext2 systems, not advantages over ext2.
But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens
conflicting advice. For example, an article from
debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
Part
On Jan 19, 2008 7:17 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext3 = ext2 + metadata(default) journaling. Therefore slower than ext2.
But all of that still gives me no reason to change all of my ext2
partitions to something else.
ext3 isn't noticably slower for user-environments, you
, and they are mostly advantages over
Reiserfs and other non-ext2 systems, not advantages over ext2.
ext2 and 3 are 100% identical save for the journal. ext2 is just as
unsafe as ext3, with ext2 perhaps being less safe due to the total
lack of journaling. That being said, I used to suffer unclean
shutdowns
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:35:25PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
...
But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me about once a year,
unfortunately also yesterday evening. In such a case there is
nothing you can do but pull
On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 AM, Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:35:25PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
...
But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me about once a year,
unfortunately
Paul Johnson wrote:
Step 1: Get root privileges.
Step 2: Type tune2fs -j /dev/whatever
Step 3: Remount the filesystem ext3...
I did this, and indeed it was amazingly easy. On a partition of
about 24 G (well, this is an *old* disk!) a file /.journal of 128
M (indeed much less than 1%) was
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
Some steps may have been unnecessary, but it seems I have a
working ext3 system now. It is really easy. The real smoke test
will come, of course, when I pull the plug. Will do this now; if
you do not hear from me, the test will have failed. Thanks to all
who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
Step 6: type tune2fs -j /dev/hda5. The journal was created
instantaneously (I'd expected this to take a long time.
but it did not).
If I may interject, creating the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
Step 6: type tune2fs -j /dev/hda5. The journal was created
instantaneously (I'd expected this to take a long time.
but it did
Curt Howland wrote:
If I may interject, creating the journal just creates a blank
file.
This would explain why creating the journal does not seem to take
any time. But strings showed that there was a lot of stuff (at
least lots of filenames) in it. Perhaps the journal is *created*
as a blank
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:27:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
If I may interject, creating the journal just creates a blank file.
So when does the journaling begin? At remount?
Perhaps on the next write once it is mounted as ext3? When the journal
To the other Mr. Johnson, sorry for the double, I botched the
reply/reply to list distinction there.
On Jan 19, 2008 12:27 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
Step 6: type tune2fs -j
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
(8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
no to either
/boot should not be a single partition by itself..
it is part of /bin, /lib, /sbin /etc
experiences of laptops and desktops. I have only
ever used ext3 except on one occasion back in 2001 where I had one partition
ReiserFS for a short time. It didn't give me any problem, but I didn't like
the mix.
Recovery of the ext3 has been brilliant in my experience on lappys and
desktops
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
not be able to fix the damage and loses data.
I've been using resierfs for some time (including on a flaky
Joe Brenner wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
not be able to fix the damage and loses data.
I've been using resierfs for some time
On Jan 18, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
(4) ReiserFS can be flaky on a system crash.
I haven't found it to be flaky on system crashes. I have found it to
be extremely unforgiving of disk corruption and IDE bus problems. I
was able to recover the data with reiserfsck, but it took
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 4:27 PM, Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xfs sure does copy and delete really large files faster - I do use it
for video at home.
How big do files have to be before one starts to notice the advantages
of XFS?
In my
On Jan 19, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
But all of that still gives me no reason to change all of my ext2
partitions to something else.
I decided to change the first time I had a server down for an hour
because it was waiting for the on-boot fsck to finish... :)
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Era exatamente este comando que eu iria te indicar:
reiserfsck --rebuild-tree -S /dev/hdaX
sim, ele resolve, ele vai varrer todo o seu disco e não apenas a área
utilizada e recuperar as informações.. já cansei de fazer isso ao
apagar ou recuperar
-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw together some
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
Hello Jimmy,
I have found:
Xfs is best for large file sizes, if that's what you are dealing with -
graphics, and the ilk;
Reiserfs
On 2008-01-18T16:11:17-0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
(1) ext3 mounts and unmounts slowly, resulting in increased boot times.
I use ext3 on same hardware, and (clean) mounts do not take any
significant time:
[ 19.209034] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[ 19.209039] VFS: Mounted
of the forums google turned up had people who did, and who
claimed it worked well
(5) ReiserFS is the best choice for /var.
Arguably, yes. My /var is still Reiser, too.
So would you advise that I do the same? As previously stated, I am
leaning towards keeping things simple and making everything
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
(8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
no to either
/boot should not be a single partition by itself..
it is part of /bin, /lib, /sbin /etc
Quoth Hugo Vanwoerkom:
ext2. Never have used any other.
I seriously hope that this was a joke...
Aleks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
That is correct, and a reason to avoid it.
Then, people disagree on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
Then again, those people would even disagree on the current local weather.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw together some of
the statements I've seen, and all I am
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:25 -0500
Allan Wind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
(8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than
ext3?
no to either
/boot should not be a single partition by itself..
it is part of /bin,
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a group reply
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell
terabyte fs or larger
- it will take forever ( even longer ) to restore the 1 terabyte of data
- times are based on past experience for say P4-2Ghz w/ 1GB of memory or
equivalent
(4) ReiserFS can be flaky on a system crash.
all journaling fs is flaky for system crash...
- some can
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a group reply
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell me/flame me gently,
and I
as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw together some of
the statements
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
(8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
no to either
/boot should not be a single partition by itself..
it is part of /bin, /lib, /sbin /etc ... which is the rootfs
even if /boot is fine, if
-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw together some
. For example, an article from
debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
Part of the confusion
Saudações.
Formatei uma partição reiserfs que não devia:
#mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sda2
Existe alguma forma de recuperar os dados?
Obrigado.
Wendell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] wrote:
Saudações.
Formatei uma partição reiserfs que não devia:
#mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sda2
Existe alguma forma de recuperar os dados?
Obrigado.
Wendell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Almeida
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Saudaes.
Formatei uma partio reiserfs que no devia:
#mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sda2
Existe alguma forma de recuperar os dados?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Howdy list,
So, I did something stupid. (Again.) My desktop went down, but I needed
a backup off of it for a different computer on the lan, so I took out
the lvm drive and put it in my other backup server. Only problem was,
the lvm drive I put in and the lvm drive I pulled from the working
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:52:14PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
Anybody know a way I can get most of these files back without having to
manually rename and reorganize everything? I'm keeping the drive
unmounted and storing data elsewhere until I can get this mess
untangled... :-/
Just pull it
,
Jacob
Hey,
This is not really a recommended solution, but I have had some success
in the past with manually re-creating lvm partitions and reiserfs fs
with the exact specs of the original directly over the messed up disk
and used reiserfs recovery tools. Some file names and directories
Niestety przy próbie urucvhomienia can not execute binary
filenie wiem czy bedzie smierdzial jak go bede palil :)
Wojciech Ziniewicz pisze:
13-08-07, Maciej Kóska [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
Witam,
Nie wiem dlaczego ale system plików reiserfs montuje mi sie tylko jako
readonly
Witam,
Nie wiem dlaczego ale system plików reiserfs montuje mi sie tylko jako
readonlya zaczelo sie chyba od przeskanowania dysku reiserfsck z
opcja --rebuild-tree i --scan-whole-partition...ale nie wiem czy ma to
zwiazek. W/w partycja jest to partycja systemowa i wiadomo mase bledow i
1 - 100 of 1418 matches
Mail list logo
