On 09 May 2023 23:21, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:40:18AM +0200, zithro wrote:
In short, zero time taken.
For a comparatively large response. Almost as if that was their goal
(trolling)!
Cheers,
Andy
Well he's using 225 chars, me 424, it's only ~ the double ;)
And
Hello,
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:40:18AM +0200, zithro wrote:
> In short, zero time taken.
For a comparatively large response. Almost as if that was their goal
(trolling)!
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
> I'd be interested to hear any (even two word) reviews
On 07 May 2023 12:14, Дмитрий wrote:
the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
Ahah this post ! ^^
For
Jeff writes:
> Unstable does not get security updates by the Debian Security Team. If
> you want timely security updates, then you have to look elsewhere.
In practice Unstable almost always gets security updates as quickly or
more quickly than Stable does. Upstream usually only patches their
On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 3:10 PM Brian wrote:
>
> On Sun 07 May 2023 at 14:57:32 -0400, Lee wrote:
>
> > On 5/7/23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
> > >>
> > >> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and
> > >> in order to
On Mon, 8 May 2023 07:12:12 +0200
Oliver Schoede wrote:
Hello Oliver,
>It was already concluded we're supposed to be talking about Neovim, the
Not really. OP hasn't been back to clarify, but version numbers appear
to support the hypothesis. However, that's not a guarantee of accuracy.
On 5/7/23 14:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:33:04AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Much smarter than me, Yoda is.
;-)
I've read enough of your posts to know better than
On Sun, 07 May 2023 21:36:32 +0200
Michel Verdier wrote:
>And beside the fact we are on a debian forum, and that debian is much
>better than fedora and arch linux, all this don't answer the main
>problem : there is no package called neodim. If this is this neodim :
>
Hello,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
> in order to get the current version [of some random software I
> never heard of], you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
> really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the
> distribution
I heard that there is just
Le 7 mai 2023 Brian a écrit :
>> > You might give Fedora a try. Its release cadence is every 6 months. At
>> > each release, Fedora typically supplies the most current version of a
>> > package.
>> >
>> > You may find Fedora aligns better with your requirements.
>>
>> How about Arch linux?
>>
On 5/7/23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
>>
>> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and
>> in order to get the current version, you need to drag something like
>> Homebrew, it really pisses you off and pushes you away from
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:33:04AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Very nasty, it is.
> >
> > Cheers
> Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Much smarter than me, Yoda is.
;-)
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
>
> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
> order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew,
> it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
You might give
On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
[...] it really pisses you off [...]
Oh, it does?
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
>
> [...] it really pisses you off [...]
Oh, it does?
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:53:36AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Дмитрий wrote:
> > the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version,
> At packages.debian.org, I put in "neodim" and got:
>
> ---
> You have searched for packages that names contain neodim in all
> suites, all
Дмитрий wrote:
>
> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
> order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew,
> it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
At packages.debian.org, I put in "neodim"
the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
18 matches
Mail list logo
