On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:30, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
>
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer
>> 13
>> > cooler.
>>
>> I'm just wondering if
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
This is an interesting ide
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> cooler.
I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
your mother board?
also from the gentoo link
$ grep CONFIG_SENSORS_FAM15H_POWER /boot/config-4.12.10
CONFIG
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
>
>
> This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option in the config file:
>
> CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m
>
> Commen
gt;
>> I have 3 case fans in the box here but lm-sensors only sees two of them
>> apparently as well as not seeing the cpu fan.
>>
>> Funny stuff.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> MF
>>
>> On 28 December 2017 at 11:50, Michael Fothergill <
>> micha
e this:
>>
>> root@bong:/home/mikef# sensors
>> asus-isa-
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> cpu_fan:0 RPM
>>
>> k10temp-pci-00c3
>> Adapter: PCI adapter
>> temp1:+21.9°C (high = +70.0°C)
>>(crit = +90.0°
AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> cooler.
>
> I installed lm-sensors and ran the /etc module update command.
>
> The output looks like this:
>
> root@bong:/home/mikef# sensors
> asus-isa-
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> cpu_fan:0 RPM
>
&
Dear Folks,
I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
cooler.
I installed lm-sensors and ran the /etc module update command.
The output looks like this:
root@bong:/home/mikef# sensors
asus-isa-
Adapter: ISA adapter
cpu_fan:0 RPM
k10temp-pci-00c3
Hi,
I'm using GNUroot Debian bash on my Anroid phone. While I have been to
install many packages like java, python, ruby, node.js, scala, groovy via
apt-get install and use them to write and run programs, I'm finding
difficulty with extracted rpm files and gcc executables. That is, they
wrong with
root@tal:~# apt-cache search alien
[...]
alien - convert and install rpm and other packages
[...]
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
-
Ein Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:59:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
schrieb:
Ein Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:51:21 -0400, Doug schrieb:
On 08/22/2013 06:50 PM, Goran Gligoric wrote:
> > Dear Sir or Madam,
> > > I have problem to download RPM Red hat program Manager I am
using debian
> > 7 3
Ein Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:51:21 -0400, Doug schrieb:
On 08/22/2013 06:50 PM, Goran Gligoric wrote:
> Dear Sir or Madam,
> > I have problem to download RPM Red hat program Manager I am using debian
> 7 32bit to install fkash player and java I have so problem
> to find and insta
On 08/22/2013 06:50 PM, Goran Gligoric wrote:
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> I have problem to download RPM Red hat program Manager I am using debian
> 7 32bit to install fkash player and java I have so problem
> to find and install I try to use your help but is totaly usless also to
&g
Dear Sir or Madam,
I have problem to download RPM Red hat program Manager I am using debian 7
32bit to install fkash player and java I have so problem
to find and install I try to use your help but is totaly usless also to use
tar.gz file is like imposible mision I am still like debian I very
ChadDavis wrote:
> I'm doing some software development that uses RPM packages. I would like
> to have RPM installed on my debian system for trivial and development only
> usage. In other words, I don't really plan to manage my system with it at
> all; i just want to use
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:40:01 +0200, ChadDavis wrote:
> I'm doing some software development that uses RPM packages. I would
> like to have RPM installed on my debian system for trivial and
> development only usage. In other words, I don't really plan to manage
> my system
I'm doing some software development that uses RPM packages. I would like
to have RPM installed on my debian system for trivial and development only
usage. In other words, I don't really plan to manage my system with it at
all; i just want to use it for my dev purposes.
My question
Thanks Bob. That worked perfectly.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
Johann Spies wrote:
> I want to convert iscan rpm (an Epson scanner driver) to a deb. This
> driver only works on i386 systems.
>
> I have installed multiarch on my system but it seems that there is no alien
> that can do the job on my system.
>
> Alternatively, I ha
Le 26.04.2013 19:39, Johann Spies a écrit :
I want to convert iscan rpm (an Epson scanner driver) to a deb. This
driver only works on i386 systems.
I have installed multiarch on my system but it seems that there is no
alien that can do the job on my system.
Alternatively, I have an old deb
Johann Spies wrote:
I want to convert iscan rpm (an Epson scanner driver) to a deb. This
driver only works on i386 systems.
I have installed multiarch on my system but it seems that there is no
alien that can do the job on my system.
Alternatively, I have an old deb of this package but
I want to convert iscan rpm (an Epson scanner driver) to a deb. This
driver only works on i386 systems.
I have installed multiarch on my system but it seems that there is no alien
that can do the job on my system.
Alternatively, I have an old deb of this package but dpkg complains there
is a
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 20:22:25 Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> There's no substitute for good, frequent and
> multiple backups.
I doubt that you would find anyone here who would disagree with you! But
failure is a nuisance even when it is not a disaster. It is worth something
to me to lessen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Go Linux wrote:
> --- On Mon, 9/26/11, Greg Madden wrote:
>
> > From: Greg Madden
> > Subject: Re: [OT] advice re Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB
> 7200 RPM Internal Hard Disk Drive
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:11:39 Go Linux wrote:
> --- On Mon, 9/26/11, Greg Madden wrote:
> > From: Greg Madden
> > Subject: Re: [OT] advice re Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB
> > 7200 RPM Internal Hard Disk Drive To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >
--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Greg Madden wrote:
> From: Greg Madden
> Subject: Re: [OT] advice re Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200
> RPM Internal Hard Disk Drive
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Monday, September 26, 2011, 6:22 PM
>
>
> On Monday 26
On Monday 26 September 2011 06:32:24 am Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lisi wrote:
> > Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal
> > Hard Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
> >
> > And would you recommend
On 9/26/2011 6:53 AM, Lisi wrote:
Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal Hard
Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
And would you recommend it? I don't want to cause myself complications with
another dud drive. :-(
/knocks on wood
I
On Monday 26 September 2011 17:12:42 francis picabia wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Andrew McGlashan
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Lisi wrote:
> >> Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal
> >> Hard Disk Dri
On Monday 26 September 2011 16:48:56 Camaleón wrote:
> As you did not provide any item from we can choose to, I can tell you
> what fetaures I look for when buying these cases:
Thanks Camaleón,
I didn't have a clue where to start! Hence no info. In the past I have just
bought a case, and it ha
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lisi wrote:
>>
>> Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal Hard
>> Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
>>
>> And would you recommend it? I d
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:37:23 +0100, Lisi wrote:
(...)
> So the next question is: I am taking your advice Camaleon. So which
> external caddy or make of external caddy would people recommend for a
> WD1002FAEX? Or doesn't it really make much difference?
It doesn't have to make any difference.
On Monday 26 September 2011 15:08:27 Camaleón wrote:
> But I bet yes, black edition features a 5-year guarantee and only
> for that I would add extra pennies to the buy.
Thanks, Camaleón. :-) That answers my question - I hadn't picked that info
up. So yes, to me that makes it worth it.
But t
Hi,
Lisi wrote:
Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal Hard
Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
And would you recommend it? I don't want to cause myself complications with
another dud drive. :-(
Of all the options from WD, I
Davide Mirtillo wrote:
Il 26/09/2011 15:44, Lisi ha scritto:
On Monday 26 September 2011 13:04:18 Camaleón wrote:
For what specific purpose?
It's not the same if you are going to use it just for backups than for
storing the "/" filesystem on a home desktop, for a hosting company as a
part of a
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:44:31 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2011 13:04:18 Camaleón wrote:
>> For what specific purpose?
>>
>> It's not the same if you are going to use it just for backups than for
>> storing the "/" filesystem on a home desktop, for a hosting company as
>> a part of a
Il 26/09/2011 15:44, Lisi ha scritto:
> On Monday 26 September 2011 13:04:18 Camaleón wrote:
>> For what specific purpose?
>>
>> It's not the same if you are going to use it just for backups than for
>> storing the "/" filesystem on a home desktop, for a hosting company as a
>> part of a hw raid sy
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:04 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:53:01 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>
> > Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal
> > Hard Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
> >
> > And would you
On Monday 26 September 2011 13:04:18 Camaleón wrote:
> For what specific purpose?
>
> It's not the same if you are going to use it just for backups than for
> storing the "/" filesystem on a home desktop, for a hosting company as a
> part of a hw raid system, to be used for a cluster or...
>
> A mo
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:53:01 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal
> Hard Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
>
> And would you recommend it? I don't want to cause myself complications
> with another du
Is the Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB 7200 RPM Internal Hard
Disk Drive worth the extra money over the Blue ranges?
And would you recommend it? I don't want to cause myself complications with
another dud drive. :-(
If you wouldn't recommend it, what would you recomme
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:16:55 +, T o n g wrote:
> - There is a complicated installation script (think of being more
> complicated than VMWare), and rpm installation is just one of its single
> line.
> - The only dependencies of the sw is actually JRE, so I'm hope I would
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:16 PM, T o n g wrote:
> However, I'm wondering if it OK to install RH packages directly using rpm
> instead of going through alien convention.
> Do you have any similar experiences?
Yes, one time my girlfriend put diesel into our gasoline powered car.
T o n g wrote:
Hi,
We all know that,
,-
| On Debian and derived systems it is recommended to use "alien" to
| convert RPM packages into .deb format instead of bypassing the Debian
| package management system by installing them directly with rpm.
`-
However, I'm wonder
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:16:55 +, T o n g wrote:
> We all know that,
>
> ,-
> | On Debian and derived systems it is recommended to use "alien" to |
> convert RPM packages into .deb format instead of bypassing the Debian |
> package management system by insta
Hi,
We all know that,
,-
| On Debian and derived systems it is recommended to use "alien" to
| convert RPM packages into .deb format instead of bypassing the Debian
| package management system by installing them directly with rpm.
`-
However, I'm wondering if it O
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:22:00AM -0500, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> hi,
> I installed PLlinuxOS which use apt-get with rpm
Hi, this is Debian User mailing list.
> I got an error "deb" format is not recognized
> In debian the rpm is not recognized, here "de
Hi,
AFAIK, it's not possible to mix these different packaging systems in a
single list of sources. You can use the "alien" package to convert between
DEB and RPM formats, among others. PCLinuxOS have this utility, but you will
have to deal hard with dependences and, overall, it&#x
hi,
Is it possible to mix rpm and deb with apt-get procedure
I installed PLlinuxOS which use apt-get with rpm
I wanted to complete the pclinus with packages I've downloaded before from
debian
here is a line in sources.list
rpm
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/te
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:17:37 -0500
> From: zlinux...@wowway.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for: A quick how to make a deb from a (kernel) rpm
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:44:23 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
> > I guess I
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:44:23 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
> I guess I'm getting old and can't see.
> ...
OK, let's try again. I did find this package
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64
But this is the hypervisor only, not the dom0 kernel that
needs to go with it
> From: b...@iguanasuicide.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for: A quick how to make a deb from a (kernel) rpm
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:07:01 -0600
>
> On Monday 08 February 2010 14:46:44 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I thought there
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:28:59 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
> I'll be the first to admit that I know nothing about xen (isn't that a
> particular sect of Buddhism? :-) ) but it looks to me like the xen
> kernel patches have been mainstreamed since 2.6.26. See, for example,
>http://packages
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:46:44 -0500 (EST), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I have stable, backports, testing, unstable, and even experimental. Sorry,
> DDs have not yet packaged anything newer than 2.6.26 that includes the Xen
> patches. I thought there were also some possible trademark issues wi
On Monday 08 February 2010 14:46:44 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I thought there were also some possible trademark issues with
> newer Xen releases, so it's possible there's some delay there as well.
Bug 391935 -- Done (not an issue)
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b..
On Monday 08 February 2010 14:01:26 Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:24:06 -0500 (EST), Mike Viau wrote:
> > I need the xen patches that are incorperated in the kernel.
>
> > I also happen to know the kernel is more recent then my 2.6.26-2-amd64
> > kernel in Debian Lenny.
>
> The se
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:24:06 -0500 (EST), Mike Viau wrote:
>
> Very fair question.
>
> I need the xen patches that are incorperated in the kernel.
+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8
>
> (ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/master/x86_64/kern
Mike Viau put forth on 2/8/2010 1:24 PM:
> If the kernel.org kernels can work with Debian I don't see a reason why the
> SUSE kernel can not work with a Debian system either.
I do. The files available from kernel.org are source, not binary. They are
vanilla. Properly configured and built, a k
etter hardware
support/modules for the e1000e network driver and lastly for better SATA/RAID
support.
-M
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:59:32 -0500
> From: zlinux...@wowway.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for: A quick how to make a deb from a (kernel) r
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:58:06 -0500 (EST), Mike Viau wrote:
>
> Hello Debian community,
>
> I have been looking for a guide to convert an rpm package (specifically
> a kernel -
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/master/x86_64/kernel-xen.rpm)
> over into a deb bin
Hello Debian community,
I have been looking for a guide to convert an rpm package (specifically a
kernel -
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/master/x86_64/kernel-xen.rpm) over
into a deb binary or even a tarball will work for me.
Unfortunately my internet searches are resulting in
.
At Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:33:52 + (UTC), noela...@gmail.com wrote:
> If it's a PostScript based printer, you can just extract the
> corresponding PPD file ("Xerox_Phaser_6280DN.ppd" in your case) and
> install it with Cups. No need to install the rpm package at all.
Th
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:31:20 -0500, Steve Kleene wrote:
> I'm running Lenny and trying to install the manufacturer's Linux driver
> for a Xerox Phaser 6280DN color laser printer. The driver is supplied
> as a tar, which unpacks to a single rpm file:
(...)
> I am able t
Steve Kleene wrote:
> I'm running Lenny and trying to install the manufacturer's Linux driver for a
> Xerox Phaser 6280DN color laser printer. The driver is supplied as a tar,
> which unpacks to a single rpm file:
>
> Xerox-Phaser-6280-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
>
> I ran
I'm running Lenny and trying to install the manufacturer's Linux driver for a
Xerox Phaser 6280DN color laser printer. The driver is supplied as a tar,
which unpacks to a single rpm file:
Xerox-Phaser-6280-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
I ran
alien --to-deb --scripts Xerox-Phaser-6280-1.0-1.
Solution:
The process list gave it away. I guess the installer detected a rpm
binary and assumed that I was in a rpm based environment? I don't
actually use 'rpm' on this system so I apt-get removed it. After
this, the nvidia installer works fine.
On second thoug
wned processes, which are inactive at
this point:
root 5893 3167 0 19:25 pts/000:00:00 /bin/sh ./NVIDIA-Linux-
x86-173.14.12-pkg1.run
root 5919 5893 0 19:25 pts/000:00:00 ./nvidia-installer
root 5928 5919 0 19:25 pts/000:00:00 sh -c env
LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.2.5 r
Some releases by date and by total size of current i386 binary packages.
Number NN under each distro code indicates initial 2.6.NN kernel version.
Uh
20 GB . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 . . . . D5
.. Ug.
al davis writes:
> but there is the "non-free" section
Which is officially not part of Debian.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Steve Lamb wrote:
> The program must include source code, and must allow
> distribution in source code as well as compiled form.
but there is the "non-free" section, which includes some
closed-source products that are proprietary in every way. I
see license statements
consultores writes:
> OK, BTW, Are free source all the packages included in Debian?
Are you asking if Debian makes the source for all the packages in Main
available? Of course! Otherwise it wouldn't be Free Software!
> What about SeLinux?
SELinux is an integral part of the Linux kernel, and ye
On Tue, June 17, 2008 4:23 pm, consultores wrote:
> OK, BTW, Are free source all the packages included in Debian? What about
> SeLinux?
... this is Debian you're talking about.
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
#2 of the DSFG:
Source Code
The program must include source code, and must
software. It seems to me this is Debian? Is there a good comparison
> > > (numbers, statistics, etc)?
> >
> > Debian, by a long shot. 26,000 packages. Next closest competitor
> > (Ubuntu) has 23,000. Most (all?) of the RPM-based distributions
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 17:53 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> consultores writes:
> > I've read that using Slackware, one can install .rpm, .deb, .gtz, .tz
> > etc. In few words, more packages!
>
> You can do that on any distribution (such as Debian) that offers the
>
consultores writes:
> I've read that using Slackware, one can install .rpm, .deb, .gtz, .tz
> etc. In few words, more packages!
You can do that on any distribution (such as Debian) that offers the
'alien' package. You may be disappointed in the results, though. In any
c
numbers, statistics, etc)?
>
> Debian, by a long shot. 26,000 packages. Next closest competitor
> (Ubuntu) has 23,000. Most (all?) of the RPM-based distributions are
> below 10,000.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions#Features
>
&g
On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> A quick web search shows that Debian sid and Gentoo are
> roughly at par with 12000+ source packages¹ each. Both are
> outnumbered by FreeBSD ports, though; they have more than
> 18000 packages available².
Gentoo and FreeBSD (and others) include some
On 2008-06-17 22:07 +0200, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Count source packages. That gets away from distro specific
> slicing and dicing of packages, and better represents the effort taken
> to package software.
True.
> I still think that Debian is ahead by source package count, bu
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:09:24 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Simon writes:
>> I am just curious which distribution have the most packaged Open
>> Source software.
> That's hard to say. Debian probably has the most packages, but Debian
> packages are also more "fine grained" than
Simon writes:
> I am just curious which distribution have the most packaged Open Source
> software.
That's hard to say. Debian probably has the most packages, but Debian
packages are also more "fine grained" than many: Debian packages seperately
pieces of software that others clump together. Pro
t closest competitor
(Ubuntu) has 23,000. Most (all?) of the RPM-based distributions are
below 10,000.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions#Features
This isn't really much surprise, though. RPM distributions have been
rather incomplete compared to the Debian ones for ove
Hi Debian users
I am just curious which distribution have the most packaged Open Source
software. It seems to me this is Debian? Is there a good comparison
(numbers, statistics, etc)?
cheers
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:19:16AM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Is there a command in Debian Sid (or in Linux in general) to find out the
> rpm of a SCSI hard drive? I can actually remove it and look at the label of
> the hard drive, but I rather not shutdown the machine just fo
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Actually, this is where the problem originated. We looked at the part
numbers of a hard drive in a cluster and ordered the parts online. But to
our dismay, we found that they have different rpm even though their part
numbers are same. I don't think this is a rel
they have different rpm even though their part
numbers are same. I don't think this is a reliable way of finding out the
rpm.
We also tried "hdparm -t /dev/sdb" to find out about the drive speeds. But
that gives the end result and not the actual hard drive rpm.
thanks
raju
--
Ka
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:19:16 -0500
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a command in Debian Sid (or in Linux in general) to find
> out the rpm of a SCSI hard drive? I can actually remove it and look
> at the label of the hard drive, but I rather not shutdow
Andrew Perrin wrote:
Well, lsscsi will give you the model number which you can then search
online
But that info is in dmesg:
...
[ 71.542625] hda: Maxtor 6Y080P0, ATA DISK drive
[ 72.533302] hdc: ST380011A, ATA DISK drive
[ 82.518152] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access WDC WD80 0JD-6
Forces_
University of North Carolina - CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there a command in Debian Sid (or in Linux in general) to find out the
rpm of a SCSI hard drive? I can actually remove it and look at the label of
the hard drive
Is there a command in Debian Sid (or in Linux in general) to find out the
rpm of a SCSI hard drive? I can actually remove it and look at the label of
the hard drive, but I rather not shutdown the machine just for this. I
tried hdparm, had a cursory look in /proc, tried google etc., but no luck
in
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
> From the alien man-page (on Sarge):
>
> >WARNING
> > Despite the high version number, alien is still (and will probably
> > always be) rather experimental software. It's been under
> > development
> > for many years now, but th
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>>
>> Alien is program that runs rpm2cpio on a rpm file and generates a deb
>> file from it.
>
>
> I know.
>
>> Suggesting that it would somehow be safer to to this by
>
>> ha
Joey Hess wrote:
Alien is program that runs rpm2cpio on a rpm file and generates a deb
file from it.
I know.
> Suggesting that it would somehow be safer to to this by
hand makes no sense at all.
Yes it does. If I did it by hand, I know that the right thing got put in
the right pl
1 - 100 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
