Aaron Hall wrote:
> So, having done that, I'm curious: why does run-parts have such a narrow
> view of a "valid filename". It's there for a reason, else why write the
> validation code?
Because it's very bad to have it run files like:
foo.dpkg-old
foo.dpkg-new
foo~
.foo.swp
All of which may easi
>
> So, having done that, I'm curious: why does run-parts have such a narrow
> view of a "valid filename". It's there for a reason, else why write the
> validation code?
>
> I'm just curious, but it would be nice to know.
>
my guess is that Debian calls the directories to be run by run-parts fo
Why does run-parts not like dots in filenames?
I'm embarrassed to admit I just spent over half an hour wrangling with the
program. Every time I had it run through a directory, it kept skipping a
particular file. The filename contained a dot.
Now, the manpage for run-parts clearly states that it w
3 matches
Mail list logo
