>packages (on Jessie)
>Fortunately, what an upgrade broke, an other upgrade has fixed:
>I upgraded from Jessie to Stretch (which took a rather long time)
>and after that all the scanners are seen again.
So you changed religions. Right.
> best regards,
--
"An
upgrade has fixed:
I upgraded from Jessie to Stretch (which took a rather long time)
and after that all the scanners are seen again.
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
On Fri 22 Dec 2017 at 15:57:37 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> until yesterday, my 2 network scanners
> - HP LaserJet Pro MFP M227
> - HP Officejet Pro 6830
> were found and worked for printing and scanning.
> God knows what happened during the nightly upgrade, but today,
hi,
until yesterday, my 2 network scanners
- HP LaserJet Pro MFP M227
- HP Officejet Pro 6830
were found and worked for printing and scanning.
God knows what happened during the nightly upgrade, but today,
the scanners are not found on my laptop (printing still works correctly)
Can anybody
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
>> from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
>> still isn't being found.
>>
>> Running
Nicolas George writes:
> Part of the development have been outsourced and the contract does not
> allow allow to distribute the source code, or even does not provide it
> to the main company.
This is very likely. They may not have even outsourced any work: just
purchased a license for some "IP":
Le quintidi 15 nivôse, an CCXXV, Jape Person a écrit :
> I really don't understand what Brother et. al. expect to gain from this
> obstinance. It's certain that the source or close relatives thereof is "out
> there" and, one presumes, available. It's not the crown jewels or trade
> secrets. It's j
have drivers for some scanners which claim to be under
the GPL. No source code though.
Yeah, what's up with that? Don't the various GPL versions require the source
code to be made available if you're going to alter the software and
re-distribute it?
The best I ca
On Wed 04 Jan 2017 at 13:19:43 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 11:27 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> >Some manufacturers, HP and Epson, for example, integrate their scanner
> >software and co-operate with SANE developers; Brother don't seem to,
> >although they do h
poker hand without showing their cards. In the real world you have to
put up or shut up. (Show me or bl*w me was the way the old boat chief on
the Skipjack used to put it.)
Some manufacturers, HP and Epson, for example, integrate their scanner
software and co-operate with SANE developers; Brot
tion between free and non-free software) that
a change in Debian is the cause of printing or scanning failure is not
unknown. Vendors not keeping their offerings up-to-date wrt Debian is
not the norm, I would say.
Some manufacturers, HP and Epson, for example, integrate their scanner
software and co-o
Woops. Corrections below:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> (Ben saw this, anyway. 8-p
>
> Sorry. Wandering back and forth between Ubuntu and Debian, I sometimes
> forget that debian treats e-mail as e-mail, where Ubuntu does the
> convenient thing.)
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:
Hi, Joel.
Just to clear up a point of confusion (mine) -- when you say you got
those debs (brscan4, etc.) from the repos, do you mean Debian
repositories? I don't see anything like that there.
If you're referring to Ubuntu repos, then that's another matter. I can't
(won't) use those with a D
(Ben saw this, anyway. 8-p
Sorry. Wandering back and forth between Ubuntu and Debian, I sometimes
forget that debian treats e-mail as e-mail, where Ubuntu does the
convenient thing.)
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/01/17 13:38, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> I got a Bro
On 01/02/2017 07:16 PM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 09:38:24 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Any progress on this? Which device is
On 01/02/2017 06:50 PM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 10:55:06 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
In the end, voting with my dollars accomplished nothing for the FOSS
community, because I simply couldn't find a functional equivalent that was
free all the way. After a while I just got tired of the r
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 09:38:24 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
> from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
> still isn't being found.
Any progress on this? Which device is it?
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 10:55:06 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
> In the end, voting with my dollars accomplished nothing for the FOSS
> community, because I simply couldn't find a functional equivalent that was
> free all the way. After a while I just got tired of the research and bought
> something tha
stating? I wouldn't care to spend the time and energy that would be
required to prove the point one way or another.
Neither do I, and the choice of printers you use, or scanners, becomes
considerably more limited when you eliminate the linux drivers supplied
by the devices maker, and which I f
puter to accomplish the scan? Is that really what you're
> > stating? I wouldn't care to spend the time and energy that would be
> > required to prove the point one way or another.
> >
> Neither do I, and the choice of printers you use, or scanners, becomes
> con
u do install the Brother proprietary stuff, run
> >> debfoster immediately afterward to confirm that you want to keep
> >> all of the parts and pieces of the drivers and their libraries so
> >> that your package manager won't try to throw it all away the next
> >&
On 01/01/2017 09:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2017 20:31:00 Jape Person wrote:
On 01/01/2017 07:38 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian
packages from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the
scanner still isn't being
On 02/01/17 13:38, Joel Rees wrote:
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Running Wheezy.
Would anyone care to tell me what steps they took to get scan
functionality on the
On Sunday 01 January 2017 20:31:00 Jape Person wrote:
> On 01/01/2017 07:38 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> > I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian
> > packages from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the
> > scanner still isn't being found.
> >
> > Running Wheezy.
>
On 01/01/2017 07:38 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Running Wheezy.
Would anyone care to tell me what steps they took to get scan
functionality
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
> from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
> still isn't being found.
>
> Running Wheezy.
>
> Would anyone care to tell me what steps they took to g
Joel Rees composed on 2017-01-02 09:38 (UTC+0900):
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Running Wheezy.
Would anyone care to tell me what steps they took to get sca
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Running Wheezy.
Would anyone care to tell me what steps they took to get scan
functionality on their Brother multifunction printers?
On 30/12/11 20:34, David Baron wrote:
> Anyone succesfully used VIsoneer USB scanners, i.e. 9250?
>
>
I don't think you'll find anyone who has got that specific model to work.
It's not supported by SANE[*1] or Vuescan[*2]. So if the manufacturer
doesn't support it
Anyone succesfully used VIsoneer USB scanners, i.e. 9250?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201112301134.41968.d_ba...@012.net.il
My HP All-in-One scans fine using HPLIP. If you buy a new one from
the store, you may have to download the latest HPLIP version to
support it. The HPLIP website has a nice wizard that shows you if the
distro version is new enough or if you need the download.
Don't get the units that have wireles
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:59:31AM +0100, Stuckey wrote:
> I'm looking to purchase a scanner. I've looked at the supported
> hardware list on http://www.sane-project.org though there are many
> listed there and I know nothing about scanners. The list also
> doesn'
list)
>>
>>> I had an "all-in"one" HP (CM1312) which I wasn't satisfied with. I'm now
>>> going to get an older Laserjet 4 and a stand alone scanner.
>>
--deleted extra--
SANE's website (http://www.sane-project.org/sane-supported-dev
nufacture are
supported? There's a list at sane, but it doesn't say when it was last
updated.
Asking people, I'm afraid.
Scanners are a "dark" world in Linux, some work very fine and others do
not work at all. Just pick some models you like (which fit your budget
and tec
On 3 February 2010 14:28, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:59:31 +0100, Stuckey wrote:
>
>> I'm looking to purchase a scanner. I've looked at the supported hardware
>> list on http://www.sane-project.org though there are many listed there
>> and I kno
Stuckey wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking to purchase a scanner. I've looked at the supported hardware
list on http://www.sane-project.org though there are many listed there
and I know nothing about scanners. The list also doesn't list the last
time it was updated.
Perhaps s
he Gimp or
OOo) using TWAIN that will allow you to perform a direct import of the
scanned image and then saving into PDF.
> How do I determine which of the newest models of a manufacture are
> supported? There's a list at sane, but it doesn't say when it was last
> updated.
Asking p
HP PhotoSmart C3180 All-in-one, three years of use and counting with Full
support on Debian.
--Original Message--
From: Camaleón
Sender: news
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Scanners
Sent: Feb 3, 2010 7:58 AM
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:59:31 +0100, Stuckey wrote:
>
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:59:31 +0100, Stuckey wrote:
> I'm looking to purchase a scanner. I've looked at the supported hardware
> list on http://www.sane-project.org though there are many listed there
> and I know nothing about scanners. The list also doesn't list the la
Hello,
I'm looking to purchase a scanner. I've looked at the supported
hardware list on http://www.sane-project.org though there are many
listed there and I know nothing about scanners. The list also doesn't
list the last time it was updated.
Perhaps someone here can recom
On Thu 9 Jul 2009 21:11:33 -0400, I asked:
> Has anyone here gotten a USB scanner to work from VMware 2?
On Wed 15 Jul 2009 11:49:21 +0200, Benjamin MENUET
suggested:
> Check the right of your driver in /dev on your Lenny.
> The user who run VMware need to have an access rx on the driver.
Tha
Hi,
Check the right of your driver in /dev on your Lenny.
The user who run VMware need to have an access rx on the driver.
Ben
2009/7/11 Steve Kleene
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:11:33 -0400, I asked:
>
> > Has anyone here gotten a USB scanner to work from VMware 2?
>
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:55:4
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:11:33 -0400, I asked:
> Has anyone here gotten a USB scanner to work from VMware 2?
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:55:41 -0700, Kevin Ross replied:
> I can't help you with your VMWare problems, but have you tried
> VirtualBox instead of VMWare?
No, I haven't gotten around to tha
I can't help you with your VMWare problems, but have you tried
VirtualBox instead of VMWare?
-- Kevin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I just installed VMware Server 2.0.1 on a Linux host (fresh Lenny install).
The client is Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2. I am unable to
connect from the XP client to my USB scanner, an Epson Perfection 2400.
I did install a USB Controller on the VM. The USB dropdown at the top of t
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:40:03 -0300
>
> Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear people,
> >
> > I have some photos that I would like to preserve in a digital form
> > and I thought of using a scanner for this.
> >
> > Unfortunately
d I thought of using a scanner for this.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I my knowlegdge about scanners is zero and I have
> > already visited the sane project page, but could not decide what
> > would be a good purchase.
> >
> > So, in light of this, I would like to ask you some recommend
y, I my knowlegdge about scanners is zero and I have
> already visited the sane project page, but could not decide what
> would be a good purchase.
>
> So, in light of this, I would like to ask you some recommendations
> based on your experiences for scanners that are fully fun
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, in light of this, I would like to ask you some recommendations based
> on your experiences for scanners that are fully functional under Linux,
> from open-source friendly companies.
Epson has excellent yet inexpensive scanners in
Dear people,
I have some photos that I would like to preserve in a digital form and I
thought of using a scanner for this.
Unfortunately, I my knowlegdge about scanners is zero and I have already
visited the sane project page, but could not decide what would be a good
purchase.
So, in light of
Once upon a time Chris Purves said...
>
> > If the device is not set to group scanner, have a look in
> > /etc/hotplug/usb/libsane.usermap. The comments at the top of this file
> > describe how the scanner permissions should be managed.
>
> My scanner is listed in this file; however, there aren't
On Saturday 18 September 2004 19:07, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Are you sure only root has permission? Is there group read/write
> permission for the group "scanner"?
If I go to /proc/bus/usb/002/005 root is both the owner and group. It would
appear that /etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner is not cha
Once upon a time Chris Purves said...
> I've set up an usb scanner recently, but I am having permissions problems.
> The scanner generally resides in /proc/bus/usb/003 but only root has
> read/write permissions. What I have been doing is manually changing the
> permissions access every time I
anges, and now "grep -i scanner
> .config" returns nothing.
>
> Any idea (tips, URLs) how to get scanners working in 2.6.3? I
> have yet to install this kernel, so I don't if my scanner will
> automagically work out of the box. But for kernels < 2.6.3, my
> scanner r
It seems that
CONFIG_USB_SCANNER=m
which produces the "scanner" module, has disappeared from kernel
2.6.3. I copied my working 2.6.2 config, passed it thru make
gconfig without any manual changes, and now "grep -i scanner
.config" returns nothing.
Any idea (tips, URLs)
I've got an Epson Perfection 1640 Office scanner, which includes a sheet
feeder. I bought a cheap SCSI card for it (it will use SCSI or
USB) because when I bought it I was still running a 2.2.x kernel which had
mediocre USB support. It's pretty fast for scanning - I'd guess less than
a minute per
urposes. I'd need something that works with the speed of a
> photocopier. An alternative would be to have something that can
> process a whole stack of papers automatically.
>
> Anyone that has had any experiences with this?
You can get scanners with sheet feeders. Some are actual
Sorry for this grossly OT post. I'd like to scan a whole lot of
documents and run them through OCR. Last time I checked scanning a
page of text took something like two minutes. This is way to slow for
my purposes. I'd need something that works with the speed of a
photocopier. An alternative would b
> I have a Umax VistaScan S6E that has 25 pin, 50 pin Centronics and an
apple
> connection. I am using a 2902E Adaptec scsi pci card (external
connection
> only). When I boot up and load the sys driver it syas that there is
no
> termination. The card has the three terminators on it. The car
I have a Umax VistaScan S6E that has 25 pin, 50 pin Centronics and an apple
connection. I am using a 2902E Adaptec scsi pci card (external connection
only). When I boot up and load the sys driver it syas that there is no
termination. The card has the three terminators on it. The card has 25 pin
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:06:48AM -0700, tony mollica wrote:
> Hi. The local computer fair is in town today
> and I'm in the market for a new printer and
> scanner, preferably USB. Any suggestions for
> either of these? The printer should be able
> to print a decent picture.
>
I am using HP b
I have a Microtek Scanmaker X6. The pro is that the driver is included in the
kernel package.
-Andy
On Sunday July 15 2001 00:08, Sam Varghese wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:06:48AM -0700, tony mollica wrote:
> > Hi. The local computer fair is in town today
> > and I'm in the market for a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:06:48AM -0700, tony mollica wrote:
> Hi. The local computer fair is in town today
> and I'm in the market for a new printer and
> scanner, preferably USB. Any suggestions for
> either of these? The printer should be able
> to print a decent picture.
Dunno about printe
Hi. The local computer fair is in town today
and I'm in the market for a new printer and
scanner, preferably USB. Any suggestions for
either of these? The printer should be able
to print a decent picture.
thanks,
--
--
tony mollica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
out how well or
> otherwise bar code scanners work under Linux.
In the same boat :(
>
> Does anyone have any information as to which scanners are particularly
> good/bad
> and how they should be connected etc etc, and the same for cash-drawer
> triggers?
Don't know about cas
ll the
> > software myself (using Perl and the GTK+ bindings). However, I have
> > no idea about how well or otherwise bar code scanners work under
> > Linux.
> >
> > Does anyone have any information as to which scanners are
> > particularly good/bad and how they s
t; otherwise bar code scanners work under Linux.
>
> Does anyone have any information as to which scanners are particularly
> good/bad
> and how they should be connected etc etc, and the same for cash-drawer
> triggers?
>
> Any info is very gratefully received.
I
Dear all!
I have been asked to start looking into providing an EPOS system for the shop
that I work at. I am hoping to be able to develop all the software myself
(using Perl and the GTK+ bindings). However, I have no idea about how well or
otherwise bar code scanners work under Linux.
Does
Hi
What are the best models of scanners for Linux (debian)?
May I connect it to an USB (or paralel) port? Or do I need an SCSI
port?
thanks,
--
Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux to work also). Anyways, the scanners they want to use are USB,
> and TWAIN-compliant (I don't have a model name yet.) I told them I
> wasn't sure if we would be able to get it to work, considering it is
> USB. I know that the new kernels have USB support, but is i
Hey,
I just got offered a job to program this new device for laptops (you
hook your laptop up to it, and you can get TV, radio, network, etc.),
but they want to do it in Linux (I would be in charge of getting the
Linux to work also). Anyways, the scanners they want to use are USB,
and TWAIN
> I just installed a Microtek X6EL, then xsane, sane, and gimp. That's
> all I had to do and this scanner was running.
Do you install sane-gimp1.1? Because if I install gimp1.1, then sane
gets removed and if I install sane then gimp1.1 gets removed. Is there
a configuration utility that comes wit
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 11:59:27AM +1030, John Pearson wrote:
> Most SCSI scanners work under Linux, using SANE.
>
> USB and parallel port scanners may work with kernel 2.4
> when it comes out, which means they may also work with
> some 2.3.x (development) kernels).
Does it inc
I just installed a Microtek X6EL, then xsane, sane, and gimp. That's
all I had to do and this scanner was running.
Oh, there were a couple of rough spots.
First I had to recompile the kernel with scsi generic support.
THen I had to run MAKEDEV in /dev to get /dev/sgX. (Why weren't they
there?
I just installed a Microtek X6EL, then xsane, sane, and gimp. That's
all I had to do and this scanner was running.
Oh, there were a couple of rough spots.
First I had to recompile the kernel with scsi generic support.
THen I had to run MAKEDEV in /dev to get /dev/sgX. (Why weren't they
there?
or use it) in Debian
> Slink?
>
Most SCSI scanners work under Linux, using SANE.
USB and parallel port scanners may work with kernel 2.4
when it comes out, which means they may also work with
some 2.3.x (development) kernels).
John P.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Oh - I
Scanners are supported under sane for Linux. I've got a AGFA Snapscan 1236S SCSI
scanner and this works fine with sane, xscanimage, the X window interface and
xsane, a separate X interface for sane. This also works directly as a plug-in
for gimp as well. I would recommend goi
Hey,
My friend is thinking about buying a scanner tomorrow, but I told him to
let me find out if it would be possible to use in Linux. It's just an
offbrand, 50$ scanner. Could we get drivers (or use it) in Debian
Slink?
Thanks,
Cameron Matheson
Hi,
I have a CanoScan 630P (parallel port) scanner at home and it works
fine under windows but I have since looked around and found out that
scanner software such as SANE do not support such hardware. I was
wondering if anyone has had any luck with this particular scanner or any
parallel porte
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:52:53PM -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "AO" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AO> have you looked into portsentry ?? ( same folks as logcheck )... -
> AO> on my todo list
>
> Is a Debian package (stable or unstable) available for portsentry ? I
> ha
"Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is a Debian package (stable or unstable) available for portsentry ? I
> haven't been able to find one as yet.
Someone is packaging it (for potato); check the debian-devel archive
if you want to know who that is (I don't remember); I've been using
port
hi ya dwayne
> > what are you guys trying to scan for ???
> > nmap seems to be the one most people use=20
> > http://www.insecure.org/nmap
>
> Yes, but I want to make sure that someone ELSE using satan can't get into
> my sister's box (she wouldn't like that). I've already used nmap.
have
> what are you guys trying to scan for ???
>
> nmap seems to be the one most people use
> http://www.insecure.org/nmap
Yes, but I want to make sure that someone ELSE using satan can't get into
my sister's box (she wouldn't like that). I've already used nmap.
--
"I already have all the l
hi ya...
> Yep. I tried to scan some other boxen on my home network, but it wouldn't
> run.
what are you guys trying to scan for ???
nmap seems to be the one most people use
http://www.insecure.org/nmap
- trying to my own silly scripts for checking:
which sendmail, which apac
On Tue, 11 May 1999, William Denton wrote:
> 1. Where's the SANE webpage - I've tried http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> but it doesn't seem to be there.
Try again... I can see it there just fine. It's really the best source of
information about scanners and Linux.
ready got a ZIP drive and printer on the parallel port, so
was wondering if it was a good idea to hang yet another device off it.
The SCSI scanners appear to be quite a bit more expensive. USB
ones are comparable with the parallel port ones, but is the USB
support in Linux good enought yet?
3. Does anyone
> 2. Should I get USB, Parallel Port or SCSI?
> I've already got a ZIP drive and printer on the parallel port, so
> was wondering if it was a good idea to hang yet another device off it.
> The SCSI scanners appear to be quite a bit more expensive. USB
> ones are comparable wi
ready got a ZIP drive and printer on the parallel port, so
was wondering if it was a good idea to hang yet another device off it.
The SCSI scanners appear to be quite a bit more expensive. USB
ones are comparable with the parallel port ones, but is the USB
support in Linux good enought yet?
3. Does anyone
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> When comparing a cheap scanner (under $100) such as the Plustek 96xx
> series with a medium price scanner such as the so-called business-class HP
> 5200c, I can't tell what claims are due to the scanner hardware itself, or
> simply the bundled software.
When comparing a cheap scanner (under $100) such as the Plustek 96xx
series with a medium price scanner such as the so-called business-class HP
5200c, I can't tell what claims are due to the scanner hardware itself, or
simply the bundled software. Obviously, the bundled software does a Linux
user
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Mark Mackenzie wrote:
> I intend to buy a scanner, mainly to be used for OCR of journal articles
> (with some b/w pictures), hopefully for less than $AUS250 (arround $A150
> I guess)
Sadly, the state of OCR under Linux is... immature at best. There
currently is no usable OCR
Hi all,
I intend to buy a scanner, mainly to be used for OCR of journal articles (with
some b/w pictures), hopefully for less than $AUS250 (arround $A150 I guess)
I have had a look at
http://www.mostang.com/sane/sane-backends.html
and the hardware howto, but the later models I am looking at do
orked fine.
My suggestion is to go and buy a SCSI-1 or 2 card that is supported and you
should be just fine. IMHO.
Erik.
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 13:39:36 +0100
From: "Helge Hafting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: H C Pumphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subjec
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, H C Pumphrey wrote:
>
> Hi debian users and SANE people:
[...]
> No-one mentions the 3181x / 3151x so I can't tell from this what to do
> about my card. If anyone can tell me what to do or point me at the right
> documentation, I'd be grateful.
[...]
If you go to the SANE ft
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/06/98
at 12:24 PM, H C Pumphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
>No-one mentions the 3181x / 3151x so I can't tell from this what to do
>about my card. If anyone can tell me what to do or point me at the right
>documentation, I'd be grateful.
If it is neither o
Hi debian users and SANE people:
This is tangential to, but not unconnected with the recent request on
debian-user for advice about what scanner to get. When I bought my Debian
system recently I got an ARTEC AT12 scanner because (a) it was on the SANE
supporeted list (b) it is alledgedly a very g
on. There *are* other scanning programs
(e.g., XVScan, which is commercial and to my knowledge only supports HP
scanners but is supposed to be quite good) but SANE is (a) free, (b)
network-transparent, and (c) works on multiple platforms, eventually
including Windows.
Two words of caution. First, paral
Hi,
>>"John" == John Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I'm planning to buy a scanner. What type will work well with Linux?
You should look into the SANE project. Specifically, the
backends (which are scanner specific) are detailed in
http://www.mostang.com/sane/sane-backends.htm
Hi
I'm planning to buy a scanner. What type will work well with Linux?
Thank you in advance.
--
John Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 12 Sep 1998, Keith wrote:
> Yes scanners do work on Linux.
Unfortunately not all of them. I have a cheap ColorHand scanner from
Primax, ant is not supported by Linux. I have written to Primax to ask
them for specification necessary for writing a driver. A was very
surprised, that I
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
