security hole in PAM?

2000-05-08 Thread Umum Wijoyo
Hello again... I've noticed that Debian frozen/potato has already used the PAM security scheme... I also heard somewhere that PAM has a security hole? Using a so-called slam.sh script, some Red Hat distros have become vulnerable... Is this also a problem with the Debian distro? Should I

Re: security hole in PAM?

2000-05-08 Thread Ethan Benson
the user. I also heard somewhere that PAM has a security hole? Using a so-called slam.sh script, some Red Hat distros have become vulnerable... Is this also a problem with the Debian distro? Should I, or should I not remove PAM? you cannot remove pam, not without breaking/removing /bin/login /bin

Re: security hole in PAM?

2000-05-08 Thread Ben Collins
All known vulnerabilities in PAM are resolved in Potato/Woody. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '