>>Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>A related question: is there any chance of getting a Debianized
>distribution of qmail in the near future? A mere source could do.
You can use a non-debianized version: the only difference is that
Debian already have qmail users and groups in /etc/passwd & /etc/
A related question: is there any chance of getting a Debianized
distribution of qmail in the near future? A mere source could do. Yes,
I know that there is qmail in project/experimental (at least my mirror
has it), but I'd rather not use alpha software -- and I think I would
be violating Dan's copy
On Sat, 19 Jul 1997, jr wrote:
> why Debian recomend install smail and not sendmail?
I think it's primarily because smail is so much easier to configure. I
originally set up smail and found it quite easy to deal with. Just this
week, however, I had to install sendmail to get a particular app
sendmail has a different security hole every week, smail has not. Smail
works EASILLY with UUCP, sendmail is more difficult, particularly when you
are trying to manage routing in a large network.
For the vast majority of cases, smail is much MUCH easier to configure and
a lot easier to follow fr
why Debian recomend install smail and not sendmail?
bye
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
5 matches
Mail list logo
