Ron Johnson wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > In the beginning systems were isolated. There was no net. Then UUCP
> > brought light unto the darkness. This was called USENET and we saw
>
>
>
> I thought that "Unix-Unix cp" was for, well, copying files, of which
> Usenet files were only a sub
> From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you install ntp-simple it will start a daemon that will
> periodically poll the time servers and gently keep your clock in
> sync. (If you're five seconds off, that time will be made up
> gradually, rather than abruptly shifting the clock.) No need t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Haines Brown) writes:
>> From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> It's almost certainly better to find a local time server and not
>> hammer on the NIST's; I'd also use ntp (ntp-simple package) to keep
>> your clock up-to-date while the system is running.
...
> Thanks for t
Paul Condon writes:
> Chrony ins a wrapper around ntp...
No. Chrony is an independent implementation of the NTP protocol.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Bob Proulx writes:
> Let me hazard a guess that chrony is not a full implementation
Chrony provides complete time service. Ntpd does do things that Chrony
doesn't but they are things like supporting atomic clock hardware and
providing obscure encryption schemes.
As mentioned elsewhere in this th
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 01:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can someone summarize the different ntp packages?
>
> In the beginning systems were isolated. There was no net. Then UUCP
> brought light unto the darkness. This was called USENET and we saw
I thought that "U
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone summarize the different ntp packages?
In the beginning systems were isolated. There was no net. Then UUCP
brought light unto the darkness. This was called USENET and we saw
that it was good. [It is a unix list so I am not mentioning fidonet.]
These isol
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:13:45PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone summarize the different ntp packages?
>
> For example what to run on a server vs. on an internal NAT'ed
> workstation.
>
I use chrony on all my machines. One machine is my access to the net.
It points to the ext
Can someone summarize the different ntp packages?
For example what to run on a server vs. on an internal NAT'ed
workstation.
Or what is best for a dialup ADSL connection vs. full-time connection.
Do all packages provied a daemon?
I'm using both chrony and ntp on various machines, and it s
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:20, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
The first place to look for time servers is your ISP. ISPs often run
time service on their nameservers. Try them.
I tried my ISP first. When I sent tech support an email asking
about the NTP servers, they
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:20, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > The first place to look for time servers is your ISP. ISPs often run
> > time service on their nameservers. Try them.
>
> I tried my ISP first. When I sent tech support an email asking
> about the NTP servers, they sen
Don't _ask_ your ISP about timeservers: their first line support is just
about guaranteed to be clueless. Just stick the nameserver IP numbers in
the Chrony or Ntp config file and try them.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
At 2003-11-06T02:18:09Z, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I already consulted that list. My home is in Orlando, FL :-)
>
> I only got an @yahoo.es account...
Gotcha. I saw the ".es" and, well, you can guess. But you still shouldn't
use ntp2.usno.navy.mil; every little shareware ti
John Hasler wrote:
The first place to look for time servers is your ISP. ISPs often run
time service on their nameservers. Try them.
I tried my ISP first. When I sent tech support an email asking
about the NTP servers, they sent me instructions on how to setup
news access. I had to explicitly s
Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-11-05T02:18:06Z, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I use the ntp and ntp-simple packages. These are the public time servers
I use in /etc/ntp.conf:
server ntp2.usno.navy.mil
server ntp-1.vt.edu
server ntp-2.vt.edu
Don't do that. Besides putting a load on
The first place to look for time servers is your ISP. ISPs often run
time service on their nameservers. Try them.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
At 2003-11-05T02:18:06Z, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use the ntp and ntp-simple packages. These are the public time servers
> I use in /etc/ntp.conf:
>
> server ntp2.usno.navy.mil
> server ntp-1.vt.edu
> server ntp-2.vt.edu
Don't do that. Besides putting a load on the precio
hwclock
Haines Brown wrote:
I'm a RedHat refugee, and sometimes I can just transfer things to
debian, and sometimes not.
I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
#! /bin/bash
rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
clock -w
I installed rdate, and that seems to work fine to set the system cloc
> From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Haines Brown) writes:
>
> > I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
> >
> > #! /bin/bash
> > rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
> > clock -w
>
> It's almost certainly better to find a local time server and not
> hammer on the
ScruLoose wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:04:58PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
uhm... "apropos clock" on my box returns
clock (3)- Determine processor time
clock (8)- query and set the hardware clock (RTC)
hwclock (8) - query and set the hardware clock (RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Haines Brown) writes:
> I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
>
> #! /bin/bash
> rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
> clock -w
It's almost certainly better to find a local time server and not
hammer on the NIST's; I'd also use ntp (ntp-simple package) to keep
your clo
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:04:58PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> So my first question is, what is debian's equivalent to "clock". All
> it did, with the -w option, was to set the hardware clock from the
> system clock. I presume the former is GMT, and so there is a time
> offset invoved.
hwclock -
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:04:58PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> I'm a RedHat refugee, and sometimes I can just transfer things to
> debian, and sometimes not.
>
> I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
>
> #! /bin/bash
> rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
> clock -w
>
> I installed rda
Haines Brown wrote:
I'm a RedHat refugee, and sometimes I can just transfer things to
debian, and sometimes not.
I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
#! /bin/bash
rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
clock -w
I installed rdate, and that seems to work fine to set the system clock
(or at l
I'm a RedHat refugee, and sometimes I can just transfer things to
debian, and sometimes not.
I have an executable script, "time.rc" which has:
#! /bin/bash
rdate -s time-b.nist.gov
clock -w
I installed rdate, and that seems to work fine to set the system clock
(or at least the system clo
25 matches
Mail list logo
