On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:40:26 +0100
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:25:20 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you make something a bit more stable!?
More testing?!! :oP
And this makes it more stable!?
Packages are maintained by
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from time
to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to time the
dependencies between packages doesn't fit and stuff breaks.
As people
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:52AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from time
to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to time the
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:03:52 -0400
Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from
time to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to
On 2008-04-15 18:35 +0200, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
excellent description. MY wife, whose box is running mostly-up-to-date
sid, is annoyed because every few months some program changes it's
icon or some bit of its interface layout... another aspect of
unstable.
True. Probably stable
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:02:13PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-04-15 18:35 +0200, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
excellent description. MY wife, whose box is running mostly-up-to-date
sid, is annoyed because every few months some program changes it's
icon or some bit of its interface
6 matches
Mail list logo
