slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Alain Nadeau
I have encountered the following problem since moving to Debian (1.2), and I must admit I cannot find the solution. It appears that some binaries compiled with slang (jed and most in any event) will not load in an xterm (nor for that matter in an rxvt, itself an slang binary!): the reply is

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread joost witteveen
I have encountered the following problem since moving to Debian (1.2), and I must admit I cannot find the solution. It appears that some binaries compiled with slang (jed and most in any event) will not load in an xterm (nor for that matter in an rxvt, itself an slang binary!): the reply is

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Joey Hess
) I hope this is solved in a later version of xterm or slang. -- #!/usr/bin/perl -i=-/*/~%*~%/~~%/~~~-/*/_/=~~~-/~~! # [EMAIL PROTECTED] $o=35;$_=$^I-*!=_!/;s/~/!*/g;s~%~-/ / ~g;$_.='--- Joey Hess ';s/=/__/g;y|*!| \\|;for(split/-/){print' 'x$o--.$_\n}# a M.C. Escher fan

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Joey Hess
But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message any more (maybe new version of slrn). It doesn't? Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed this. Joost, are you running slang0.99.34? -- #!/usr/bin/perl -i=-/*/~%*~%/~~%/~~~-/*/_/=~~~-/~~!

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread joost witteveen
But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message any more (maybe new version of slrn). It doesn't? Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed this. Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang. Anyway, I didn't

Re: slang and xterm

1997-01-19 Thread Alain Nadeau
Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed this. Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang. Anyway, I didn't want to bother checking. Joost, are you running slang0.99.34? Yes.  Thanks to both Joost and Joey! I've unset my