"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> Packages from security.debian.org won't be installed into testing by
> apt-get, because even though they might be "newer", they still are an
> older version of the package, merely patched to fix the security
> problem.
O. I am beginning to see a possible problem
Nate Amsden wrote:
Mark Devin wrote:
How safe would it be to always run with "unstable" - continually
updating?. Am I likely to get a broken system which cannot be fixed
without expert skills?
its amazing how many people want to run unstable.. you are likely to get
a broken system at one p
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:42:16PM +1000, Mark Devin wrote:
> What about "testing"? Is that reasonably stable enough in your opinion, or
> would I be just playing with fire? Especially given that I have significantly
> less experience than you.
One very important thing to remember about testing
Mark Devin wrote:
> What about "testing"? Is that reasonably stable enough in your opinion, or
> would I be just playing with fire? Especially given that I have significantly
> less experience than you.
it should probably be ok, but once if it was my system and i had upgraded to
testing(i haven
On Wednesday 28 March 2001 07:42, Mark Devin wrote:
> Nate Amsden wrote:
> > its amazing how many people want to run unstable.. you are likely to get
> > a broken system at one point or another. it may not require expert skills
> > but it may be a pain. ive been using unix and linux for almost 7 y
Nate Amsden wrote:
> its amazing how many people want to run unstable.. you are likely to get
> a broken system at one point or another. it may not require expert skills
> but it may be a pain. ive been using unix and linux for almost 7 years now
> and i won't go near unstable still. i'm very con
Mark Devin wrote:
> How safe would it be to always run with "unstable" - continually
> updating?. Am I likely to get a broken system which cannot be fixed
> without expert skills?
its amazing how many people want to run unstable.. you are likely to get
a broken system at one point or another. it
I am just a little confused from all the previous posts regarding
sources.list
What I need is the most up to date stuff, including security updates. I
am willing to risk a little bit of testing but don't want really
unstable stuff that might break my system making it unusable.
Is this an OK sour
8 matches
Mail list logo
