Hellow Debian Hackers,
This email[0].
The submitter use reportbug(1) program of Debian.
And it seems that submitter use `reportbug.debian.org' as relay SMTP.
And the contents are good i think.
By the way, SpamAssassin did mark as SPAM (X-Spam-Flag: YES).
What do you guys think about this
On 20/3/22 6:41 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
Does anybody have a working example of postfix with postscreen and
spamassassin all working together?
I have now found that 'pass' stanzas for each SMTP IP on a multi-homed machine
are ignored. The only pass stanza that is used is the ge
Does anybody have a working example of postfix with postscreen and
spamassassin all working together?
* In the first instance on a single homed machine.
* Then on a multi-homed machine so stanzas are individual to each IP
address.
* And finally a version that also works with haproxy
ng with -T switch at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger.pm line 241.
Now what the hell is the -T switch...
man perl
cannot find it right there (wish I knew the right chapter).
The source code wasn't much help either.
But after a bit of Googling, after I narrowed down the query,
I
Dear fellow Debian users,
it seems that I've found the correct answer.
In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf,
in addition to the aforementioned:
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
I have added:
use_bayes_rules 1
Found when trawling the /usr/share/perl5/Mail directory,
namely discover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:32:38AM +0900, soyeo...@doraji.xyz wrote:
> "Frantisek Rysanek" 께서 쓰시길,
> 《記事 全文 <59629f76.25660.58659...@frantisek.rysanek.post.cz> 에서》:
>
> > [...]
> > I've just built a new mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
> > with Postf
"Frantisek Rysanek" 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <59629f76.25660.58659...@frantisek.rysanek.post.cz> 에서》:
> [...]
> I've just built a new mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
> with Postfix + Cyrus. I have a long history of using
> [..]
> Any help would be much appreciated.
Sorry man, this is off story. If i
Dear polite people in the debian-users mailing list,
I would appreciate any help with the following setup.
For the record, I'm sending this same text to the
SpamAssassin "users" mailing list - I'm not technically
cross-posting, as that would probably earn me a bad
reputatio
Would anyone know offhand what might be changing the value of variable
$spam_score in the acl/40_exim4-config_check_data section of the exim4
configuration file exim4.conf.template?
It's an idle question but I'm curious why I would be getting a header like this:
X-Spam_score: 10.8
X-Spam_score_in
Hello,
I'm concerned about debian-spamd giving itself bin/sh instead of
bin/false after install.
I dint find any documentation about the necessity of debian-spamd
needing bin/sh.
Can anyone pls help?
Greets
Sabrina
rmation. Best if you simply start at the beginning and
proceed through from there.
> The other one, also maybe around exim4, root, involves spamassasin.
How are you running spamassassin? There are many ways to run
spamassassin. Each way is uniquely different.
> That upgraded a coup
Ever since my 64-bit fresh install adventure, various things simple are not
working, no idea why. I no longer get logcheck emails, for example. The other
one, also maybe around exim4, root, involves spamassasin.
That upgraded a couple of days ago and lo and behold, I began having the spam
stuff
I'm running mutt, exim, and spamassassin under Wheezy. I tried to block
spam from certain sites by creating ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs. In that
file I have lines such as
blacklist_from *@*.link
I then restarted spamd with
# service spamassassin stop
# service spamassassin start
After digging around in several wiki pages and other google hits on
'debian exim4 spamassassin'
I'm thoroughly confused by now.
One of the sources:
https://wiki.debian.org/Exim#Spam_scanning
Under the `Spam scanning' header it tells me exim has a default
configuration for
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Probably no one is running amavis-new plus spamassassin plus getting
> that message. I am not.
The recommended way to plug spamassassin into amavisd-new is to NOT use
spamd.
amavisd-new integrates a lot better over the perl module API to spamassass
en i run the command as user amavis i get the same, old, error message:
>> $ test -e /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob &&
>> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob sa-sync
>> config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002" is inaccessible:
>> Permission denied
>>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:20:21AM +0200, Oliver Zemann wrote:
> I changed my permissions with chown -R debian-spamd:debian-spamd
> /var/lib... so this should be fixed, thanks.
Along with ownership, did you also change the permissions on
/var/lib/spamassassin?
Cheers,
Tom
--
Differe
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Oliver Zemann wrote:
> When i run the command as user amavis i get the same, old, error message:
> $ test -e /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob &&
> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob sa-sync
> config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002"
If required, i could also paste the strace somewhere
Am 29.05.2014 02:32, schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Oliver Zemann wrote:
>> Really no one here who could help me with that?
>
> Probably no one is running amavis-new plus spamassassin plus getting
> that message. I am not.
>
Hi Bob
Thanks for your reply.
I really thought no one will ever answer me here :)
spamassassin3.3.2-5+deb7u1
amavisd-new 1:2.7.1-2
lsb_release -rd
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy)
Release:7.5
I changed my permissions with
Oliver Zemann wrote:
> Really no one here who could help me with that?
Probably no one is running amavis-new plus spamassassin plus getting
that message. I am not.
> I am recieving an error by cron since a couple of weeks. I cant remember
> exactly what was updated, but i am pretty su
never got such emails:
>
> subject: Cron test -e /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob &&
> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob sa-sync
> content:
> config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002" is inaccessible:
> Permission denied
> config: path "/var/lib/spamassass
sa-sync
content:
config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002" is inaccessible:
Permission denied
config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/languages" is inaccessible:
Permission denied
config: path "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/triplets.txt" is
inaccessible: Pe
Have you done a "apt-get update" before?
On 12.03.2014 15:11, x_fir...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I have run into a problem trying to install spamassassin.
>
> sudo apt-get install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav-daemon
> Failed to fetch
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/po
Hi,
I have run into a problem trying to install spamassassin.
sudo apt-get install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav-daemon
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libl/liblwp-protocol-https-perl/liblwp-protocol-https-perl_6.03-1_all.debSize
mismatch
E: Unable to fetch some
Running Sid 32-bit system:
Spamassassin no longer working. Get errors like
server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not create IO::Socket::INET6
socket on [127.0.0.1]:783: Address already in use
Some lock file I need to manually clear?
Configuration change since upgrade?
--
To
Bob Proulx wrote:
> How about piping the email through:
>
> | spamassassin -d -t -D 2>&1 | less
>
> That will produce a summary at the bottom with the points from each
> rule that fired. Is that good enough?
Thanks for the suggestion, however there are several proble
lem that the SA configuration might not do what I want.
How about piping the email through:
| spamassassin -d -t -D 2>&1 | less
That will produce a summary at the bottom with the points from each
rule that fired. Is that good enough?
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
spamd: result: . 1 -
DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
Currently I'm getting log entries like the above from SpamAssassin.
spamd: result: . 1 -
DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD=1,SPF_PASS=-1,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=1,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0
I want to see something like the above
Hi,
Camaleón wrote:
I can't see the problem now that you made the change. Is there still
anything wrong with your current setup? :-?
No, it is all fine with the change.
I was going to post this as solved, but thought it might be better to
see what others thought about the change and to make
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:06:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On a server that still has lenny, I was getting a message (started on
> 27th June) as follows each day (from /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin
> script:
>
> Jul 2 15:16:26.778 [17797] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.
Hi,
On a server that still has lenny, I was getting a message (started on
27th June) as follows each day (from /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin script:
Jul 2 15:16:26.778 [17797] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.0/8 as
it has already been included
The /etc/spamassassin/local.cf had 127
saved in my bookmarks:
http://www.besy.co.uk/debian/how_to_configure_spam_and_virus_scanning_with_amavis_and_spamassassin
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/focus_spam_postfix?page=0%2C2
http://www.freespamfilter.org/FC4.html
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInPostfixWi
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:59:17 -0400, vr wrote:
OK, I went ahead and installed amavisd-new and netstat shows
listeners even though I haven't changed anything yet.
[...]
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:10025 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 5467/perl
Thanks Andreas, I had installed the spampd pac
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:08:06 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
Good. Now you can follow with this:
/usr/share/doc/amavisd-new/README.postfix.html
Had found that and been reading.
Looks to be similar saying master.cf changes need to be done even
though services are already on those ports.
--
On 2011-06-13 18:29, Camaleón wrote:
> For simple setups, you can avoid amavisd-new and use instead spamd, but
> the latter has its drawbacks.
Use spampd which should do exactly what you want.
HTH, ändu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:59:17 -0400, vr wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:29:25 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Whatever you decide, I would start from here:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta
>
> OK, I went ahead and installed amavisd-new
rom here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta
OK, I went ahead and installed amavisd-new and netstat shows listeners
even though I haven't changed anything yet.
# netstat -ntap
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:10:57 -0400, vr wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:50:08 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> SpamAssassin configuration varies a lot depending on the partner
>> application in will run with (meaning the smtp server, antimalware and
>> any kind of pro
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:50:08 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
SpamAssassin configuration varies a lot depending on the partner
application in will run with (meaning the smtp server, antimalware
and
any kind of proxy in between, like Amavisd-new).
In addition to this, you also need to deploy a
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:34:14 -0400, vr wrote:
> As the subject says. Findings in Google are dated, talk about creating
> lots of the config manually and seem wrong based on what I'm seeing on
> a new installed system.
SpamAssassin configuration varies a lot depending
As the subject says. Findings in Google are dated, talk about creating
lots of the config manually and seem wrong based on what I'm seeing on a
new installed system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:56:25PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently
> (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example.
>
> Alternatively, where might I lower the points for its internal ruleset?
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:56:25 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently
> (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example.
Uusually (it varies depending on you setup) under "/etc/mail/spamassassi
Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently
(defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example.
Alternatively, where might I lower the points for its internal ruleset?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:40:55 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>> Check "/etc/default/spamassassin" file, there is a variable ("CRON=0")
>> that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules auto-updating.
>
> Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
> Check "/etc/default/spamassassin" file, there is a variable
> ("CRON=0") that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules
> auto-updating.
Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that is to specify in the
sa
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:14:29 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I wonder if it is possible to auto/manually update spamassassin rules
> without having it running in daemon mode - say, being run by cron only
> update script.
I think SA is ready for that.
Check "/etc/default/spamassassin&quo
Good day.
I wonder if it is possible to auto/manually update spamassassin rules
without having it running in daemon mode - say, being run by cron only
update script.
I do not need it running in daemon mode as it works well even this way
- on one hand, and if running in daemon - i may have
Hi.
Lately spamassassin is taking 10 seconds or so to start on boot, there is
also lots of hd activity. Is there any known cause for this or maybe a bug?
Thanks
--
___
José Santos | Debian Squeeze/Sid
jsan...@ubi.pt | 2.6.32-amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 2010-03-05 03:57, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using?
fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop
$ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
>> Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using?
>
> fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop
>
> $ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
> smtp inet n - n - - \
&g
On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
Perhaps you need the line:
allow_user_rules 1
in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
Thanks. I'll see how that worked.
No luck.
Added "allow_user_rules
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Perhaps you need the line:
>>> allow_user_rules 1
>>> in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
>>
>> Thanks. I'll see how that worked.
>>
&
On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
the format:
whitelist_from f...@bar.com
However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam
eb, per-user
>>> whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format:
>>> whitelist_from f...@bar.com
>>
>> Side note: "whitelist_from" is the most dangerous variant of those
>> whitelist commands in SA. "whitelist_auth" of &
Jari Fredriksson wrote at 2010-03-03 07:52 -0600:
> On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should
> > do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user
> > whitelist addresses go in
On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Up-to-date Sid system.)
>
> SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should
> do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user
> whitelist addresses go in ~/.spa
On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
the format:
whitelist_from f...@bar.com
However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any
thoughts?
Perhaps you need the line
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
> per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
> the format:
> whitelist_from f...@bar.com
> However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any
> thoughts?
Perhaps you need the line:
allow_user_
Hi,
(Up-to-date Sid system.)
SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it
should do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb,
per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
the format:
whitelist_from f...@bar.com
(Yes, I res
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:53:33 -0800, Tudod Ki wrote:
> Does someone has a good howto regarding $subject? :) Thank you!!
Debianadmin use to have very good how-to's:
How to filter spam with Spamassassin and Postfix in Debian
http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-filter-spam-with-spamassa
Does someone has a good howto regarding $subject?
:) Thank you!!
I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1)
...
f this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by adding some X-
Spam- headers and no ch
29.10.2009 4:43, Umarzuki Mochlis kirjoitti:
> I got 2 debian 5 on vmware, both running postfix and dovecot-imap
>
> on server a, i already installed spamassassin and spamc (nothing else
> configured) and add .procmailrc in a user (user1) home directory with
> configu
I got 2 debian 5 on vmware, both running postfix and dovecot-imap
on server a, i already installed spamassassin and spamc (nothing else
configured) and add .procmailrc in a user (user1) home directory with
configuration as below:
## start .procmailrc
MAILDIR = $HOME/Mail
:0fw
Am 25.12.2008 um 16:07 schrieb Daniel D Jones:
After an apt-get upgrade, Spamassassin failed to configure:
r...@etch:~# dpkg --configure spamassassin
Setting up spamassassin (3.1.7-2etch1) ...
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: [6777] dbg: logger: adding
facilities: all
[6777] dbg
After an apt-get upgrade, Spamassassin failed to configure:
r...@etch:~# dpkg --configure spamassassin
Setting up spamassassin (3.1.7-2etch1) ...
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: [6777] dbg: logger: adding
facilities: all
[6777] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[6777] dbg: logger
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:35 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> 1) Have you done a script for update the signatures of spamassassin?
If you're just trying to get the latest score-files for SpamAssassin,
you get those automatically with each new SpamAssassin version from
Debian. You don'
Hi folsk :-)
I've two questions:
1) Have you done a script for update the signatures of spamassassin?
and
2) Is it usual (after an update of today) that the dir of signatures, has date
febraury 25?
thanks :-)
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> > With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently
> > since the transition of perl 5.1. :-)
>
> Oops... 5.10
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
> Michelle Konzack
> Systemadministrator
> 24V
Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently
> since the transition of perl 5.1. :-)
Oops... 5.10
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Lin
Am 2008-05-25 10:55:16, schrieb David Fisher:
> Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to
> start in my lenny amd64 workstation box.
>
> Anyone else with the problem or is it just me?
END OF REPLIED MESSAGE
With Lenny/
On Sun, 25 May 2008, David Fisher wrote:
Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to
start in my lenny amd64 workstation box.
Anyone else with the problem or is it just me?
I had a very similar problem with my i386 box. Do you have the OpenPGP
plugin installed by any c
Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to
start in my lenny amd64 workstation box.
Anyone else with the problem or is it just me?
--
David
There is a theory that the Scots invented single malt whisky in order
to be able to enter a state in which consuming haggis wo
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 16:52:17 +0200, Josep M. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have installed spamassassin from www.backports.org and runs well, but
> when I want stop this gives me a message error that perl is not found.
>
> I have all ok in my system, and perl is in the right plac
Hello.
I have installed spamassassin from www.backports.org and runs well, but
when I want stop this gives me a message error that perl is not found.
I have all ok in my system, and perl is in the right place, what can I
do here?
Here is all details
debianet:/etc/postfix/system/backup# /etc
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 13:04:14 -0700]:
> It can and has in the past. SpamCop's terms of service expressly forbid you
> from reporting mailing list traffic, spam or not.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Klein
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is th
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 11:59:30 am Klein Moebius wrote:
> If I enable SpamCop reporting in Spamassassin and subsequently
> report a spam message on a mailing list to SpamCop via Spamassasin,
> will the mailing list then get a block from SpamCop?
It can and has in the past. SpamCop&#
If I enable SpamCop reporting in Spamassassin and subsequently
report a spam message on a mailing list to SpamCop via Spamassasin,
will the mailing list then get a block from SpamCop?
--
Regards,
Klein
"I'm willing to sacrifice anything for this cause, even other peop
Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this message for the
mere mention of the site "mail-to-web.com"? (that's not the string that
was used, but I don't want to fall into a spambucket)
Danie
In my case, Spamassassin gave it a -1.0, but the Thunderbird Junk mail
Hi all
To prevent the possibility of a spamassassin catch in the future I'll use
this (very slow) e-mail client provided by my ISP. Sorry for the
inconvenience.
Larry
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/09/08 11:58, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> On Sun
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:37:41 -0700
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this message
> > > for the mere mention of the site "mail-to-web.com"? (that's
> > > not
AIL
> > PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> >> Doug
> >> The mind boggles imagining a scenario involving covering a mother board
> >> with tobacco. You might also try Acetone (finger polish remover).
> >> Larry
> >
> > Did anyone else noti
to say:
> >> Doug
> >> The mind boggles imagining a scenario involving covering a mother board
> >> with tobacco. You might also try Acetone (finger polish remover).
> >> Larry
> >
> > Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this mess
Thank you folks!
Filtering RMAIL spam messages with spammassassin headers.
For a single session in RMAIL in EMACS, emphasis, for a single
session, what already existing emacs commands are there to filter all
the email in RMAIL with spamassassin headers indicating spam to a
separate file that can
mother board
>> with tobacco. You might also try Acetone (finger polish remover).
>> Larry
>
> Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this message for the
> mere mention of the site "mail-to-web.com"? (that's not the string that
> was used, but I
Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this message for the
mere mention of the site "mail-to-web.com"? (that's not the string that
was used, but I don't want to fall into a spambucket)
Danie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 07:26:02AM -0500, Don Saklad wrote:
> For nonprogrammers maybe dyslexic, or maybe ADD, how can spamassassin
> headers be filtered so that all or most of the spam messages, rather
> than mixed in with email, all or most go to a separate email file that
> can be
For nonprogrammers maybe dyslexic, or maybe ADD, how can spamassassin
headers be filtered so that all or most of the spam messages, rather
than mixed in with email, all or most go to a separate email file that
can be checked for any false positives?... RMAIL in EMACS
and from time to time mutt are
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:05:00PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > > I've reconfigured
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > I've reconfigured the file with your recommendations and restarted exim.
> > I'm still not
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:30:21PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 20
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> >
> > > SA should l
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
>
> > SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look
> > for info...
>
> I
On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look
> for info...
I have two spamd entries in mail.info:
Sep 24 14:51:09 etch spamd[10151]: spamd
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Trying to get spamassassin and exim4 playing together. I do not want exim to
> drop email, only to add headers to the message so that the MUA can filter
> messages according to the users preference.
I've recently d
Trying to get spamassassin and exim4 playing together. I do not want exim to
drop email, only to add headers to the message so that the MUA can filter
messages according to the users preference.
I have spamassassin running as a deamon on port 783. I've verified that I can
telnet to the
Anthony M Simonelli wrote:
> I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use
> RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix
> perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on
> Postfix, those emails will be reje
On Saturday 18 August 2007 14:51, Anthony M Simonelli wrote:
> I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use
> RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix
> perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on
&g
1 - 100 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
