[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ssh-keygen -t dsa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ssh maq_remota -l user_uno cat .ssh/id_dsa.pub
~/.ssh/authorized_keys2
Ahora podes conectarte desde [EMAIL PROTECTED] a [EMAIL PROTECTED] sin
usar password utilizando el protocolo SSH 2.
Saludos
- Original Message -
From: alex
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:39:42PM -0500, alex aponte wrote:
Alguien sabe como se hace en ssh version 2 para que no
pida password al loguearme?
con ssh 1 lo puedo hacer pero con la version 2 hasta
ahora no.
Extraido de man sshd_config:
PasswordAuthentication
Specifies whether
Alguien sabe como se hace en ssh version 2 para que no
pida password al loguearme?
con ssh 1 lo puedo hacer pero con la version 2 hasta
ahora no.
Gracias
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
alex:
quote
Alguien sabe como se hace en ssh version 2 para que no
pida password al loguearme?
/quote
en el man de ssh encontre que dice:
man
ssh implements the RSA authentication protocol automatically. The user
creates his/her RSA key pair by running ssh-keygen(1). This stores the
private
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from
stable - testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before?
ssh2 is more computationally intensive.
* Adam Majer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from
stable - testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:03:03PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Set cipher to blowfish (or none, if you're running it over trusted
network), remove compression.
Debian's ssh package is compiled without support for cipher=none. You
can rebuild it if you really want that, of course...
Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from
stable - testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before?
A ssh -v kanyon exit reveals that the slow point is immediately
after
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY
.. but
Title: RE: SSH 2 slower than 1?
JC,
If you don't get a reasonable answer here. Maybe trying the OpenSSH list might help. Might be a good place to ask there too. From what I see from posts there they answer fairly quickly like debian-user does.
Later,
Todd
-Original Message
I'm wondering too why ssh2 takes much longer to build a connection.
On recent machines it takes only about 2-3 seconds, but that's still
slow, esp. for things like tkcvs, and slow connections make it worse.
chj.
On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from
stable - testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before?
ssh2 is more computationally intensive.
RS Of course, there's probably a package around that would be alot easier.
Yep.
By the way, I think that on a Potato system it would be better to
link SSL statically so as to avoid confusion between SSL versions.
Juliusz
Anyone got a trusted source for a packaged ssh 2 for Potato?
Thanks,
Juliusz
From: Juliusz Chroboczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone got a trusted source for a packaged ssh 2 for Potato?
Try:
#!/bin/sh
# openssl.sh
# http://www.openssl.org/source/
VER=0.9.6
APP=openssl
DIR=$APP-$VER
FILE=$APP.tar.gz
URL=http://www.openssl.org/source/$FILE
if [ ! -f
is anyone out there using OpenSSH 2.0.13 from the testing archive? or
does anyone know when we can use ssh2 as a debian package. sure, i
could tarball install, but i'd much rather stick to packages to
minimize my time commitment.
martin
[greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL
MaD dUCK writes:
is anyone out there using OpenSSH 2.0.13 from the testing archive? or
does anyone know when we can use ssh2 as a debian package. sure, i
could tarball install, but i'd much rather stick to packages to
minimize my time commitment.
I'm using ssh 2 from unstable. I've
It's available in potato/non-US I believe. I just tried searching for it
with the bot on the #debian irc channel and it couldn't find it. Since it
can only search the US mirrors, and since I have seen it before, it must
be a non-US package.
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Rune Linding Raun wrote:
i need
i need SSH2 daemon on my system does it excist as a .deb?
Rune Linding Raun wrote:
i need SSH2 daemon on my system does it excist as a .deb?
Take a look at
http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/non-us/ssh2.html
--
__ _
Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __
Chula Vista, CA
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:28:14 +0200, you wrote:
Work is being done to implement the version 2 protocol as free software
(GPLed); see http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/ ; contributors to this project
are welcome.
However, I have been told that lsh uses scheme which is not free in a
Debian sense. Thus,
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 23:40:57 +, Marc Haber wrote:
However, I have been told that lsh uses scheme which is not free in a
Debian sense. Thus, lsh will not yield a true free version of ssh which
is what the world _urgently_ needs.
You're misinformed.
- Scheme is a programming language,
Hi all:
I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh (I
know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following:
bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca
Disconnected; protocol version not supported.
They are using vershio 1, AFAIK. Does this mean that v.2 is
incompatible with it or
On 23 Apr 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh (I
know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following:
bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca
Disconnected; protocol version not supported.
They are using vershio 1, AFAIK. Does this
On 23 Apr 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
Hi all:
I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh
(I know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following:
bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca
Disconnected; protocol version not supported.
They are using
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 10:10:18 -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
The other option is to can ssh2 (and I would just because of the licensing
differences)
SSH2, while having a license that is more evil than SSH1, is based on
version 2 of the SSH protocol, which is much more friendly for free
software
On Friday, April 23, 1999 at 10:06:19 -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote:
From: Arcady Genkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - Emerald
Sender: Arcady Genkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh
Well, let me say what I did to get it working:
I installed ssh1 first...
with deamons and all...
then I installed ssh2... over that.
then edited /etc/ssh2/ssh2_config
set this to yes, when I found it in the manpages:
Ssh1AgentCompatibility yes
so, now when a ssh1 client tries to connect
Hello,
where can I find ssh 2, please?
thank you
Jiri
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll know the future has arrived when every mailer transparently
quotes lines that begin with From , but no-one remembers why.
where can I find ssh 2, please?
ftp.cs.hut.fi
Groetjes, Ookhoi
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 21:00:35 +1000, Jiri Baum wrote:
where can I find ssh 2, please?
ftp://ftp.cs.hut.fi/pub/ssh/
It's license is more restrictive than SSH1's; noone has so far volunteered
to package it.
Unlike SSH1's protocol, SSH2's can be implemented in free software. If you
I just downloaded and installed ssh2, but am unable to ssh to my comp...
I keep getting the following errors when I ssh in verbose mode:
dove: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
dove: ssh_connect: getuid 5443 geteuid 0 anon 0
dove: Connecting to dogbert.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.95.152]
31 matches
Mail list logo