On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Benjamin Sher wrote:
Dear friends:
A follow-up question:
If you install the current sarge stable release, can you install deb
packages from any earlier releases? That is, either earlier stable
or testing deb packages? What's the hierarchy here: sarge stable,
ea
production machine, I ran sarge as testing for about a year now,
and I haven't updraded to etch yet. I normally maintain a dual-boot
configuration with a choice of stable or testing. At the moment my
woody system (which was stable) won't access the net, presumably
becuse it doesn't hav
On 12 Jul 2005 at 1:02, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> >Dear kamaraju:
> >
> >Thank you again. One last question:
> >
> >If I install the stable sarge release, and someone issues a new
> >debian package for some application, how do you decide whether
> >to install it or n
Benjamin Sher wrote:
Dear kamaraju:
Thank you again. One last question:
If I install the stable sarge release, and someone issues a new
debian package for some application, how do you decide whether
to install it or not? Does apt-get take care of all that
automatically?
Thank you.
Benjam
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:38:11PM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> If I install the stable sarge release, and someone issues a new
> debian package for some application, how do you decide whether
> to install it or not? Does apt-get take care of all that
> automatically?
In general, unless there
Dear kamaraju:
Thank you again. One last question:
If I install the stable sarge release, and someone issues a new
debian package for some application, how do you decide whether
to install it or not? Does apt-get take care of all that
automatically?
Thank you.
Benjamin
On 11 Jul 2005 at 22:
Benjamin Sher wrote:
Dear Kamaraju:
Thank you so much for the clear presentation.
You can always update from sarge to Etch. But you cannot go from Etch to
Sarge.
raju
That's a key point! So it makes sense to install Sarge and then
update to Etch. One last question: Is this updat
Benjamin Sher wrote:
"Sarge" is now the STABLE release and "etch" is now the
TESTING release.
That is correct.
I would like to download the testing release so I would get
the latest possible versions of Debian packages. I imagine
that if I installed the stable release, that I would have
Dear Leonid and friends:
So you would recommend installing the new "etch" testing distro?
Is an iso image available of the "etch" testing release?
That's what I find confusing. Since "sarge" is not longer "testing"
but "stable", which testing are we talking about and where are the
iso images f
Dear friends:
A follow-up question:
If you install the current sarge stable release, can you install deb
packages from any earlier releases? That is, either earlier stable
or testing deb packages? What's the hierarchy here: sarge stable,
earlier stable, earlier testing, etc.
Quite con
Dear friends:
A follow-up question:
If you install the current sarge stable release, can you install deb
packages from any earlier releases? That is, either earlier stable
or testing deb packages? What's the hierarchy here: sarge stable,
earlier stable, earlier testing, etc.
Quite con
Dear friends:
I would like to download and install the latest Debian 3.1,
but even after a careful reading of all the info on the Debian
site, I am quite confused.
"Sarge" is now the STABLE release and "etch" is now the
TESTING release.
I would like to download the testing release so I would
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:30:22PM +0100, @(none) wrote:
> Stable, but should it not be described in /etc/apt/sources.list as woody
> iso stable?
> So that at rollovertime (real soon now (tm)),
> stable=woody-->stable=sarge there are no unexpected upgrades.
That would depend what you wanted to h
Stable, but should it not be described in /etc/apt/sources.list as woody
iso stable?
So that at rollovertime (real soon now (tm)),
stable=woody-->stable=sarge there are no unexpected upgrades.
mvg Boudewijn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
uchanan wrote:
> > Should i be using stable or testing for the live servers? Be aware i am
> > only just getting to grips with 'the debian way'... I guessing 'stable'?
>
> You guessed correctly - production servers definitely should use stable.
> If you need a mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:37:28AM +1300, Simon Buchanan wrote:
> Should i be using stable or testing for the live servers? Be aware i am only
> just getting to grips with 'the debian way'... I guessing 'stable'?
If you
On Sunday 01 February 2004 05:37 pm, Simon Buchanan wrote:
> Should i be using stable or testing for the live servers? Be aware i am
> only just getting to grips with 'the debian way'... I guessing 'stable'?
You guessed correctly - production servers definitely should
live servers one by
> one My question is:
>
> Should i be using stable or testing for the live servers? Be aware i am only
> just getting to grips with 'the debian way'... I guessing 'stable'?
Stable stable stable. Stable is the only release that is 100% sure to
g
Being a post-redhat user, i have downloaded the 'testing' version of debian,
installed on my test bench, then on the in-house development server and am
VERY impressed! So the next step is to go after our 4 live servers one by
one My question is:
Should i be using stable or testi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:08:43PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> I was wondering what version of Debian people prefer for servers?
> Stable, or testing. I understand that unstable is right out for this
> sort of application, even though tha
[20030705] Johann Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I run a small server, does http/ssh/imap, pretty much just for me. Yes,
> smtp is locked down. No spam from here :-P.
>
> I was wondering what version of Debian people prefer for servers?
> Stable, or testing. I understand t
Johann Koenig wrote:
> I was wondering what version of Debian people prefer for servers?
> Stable, or testing. I understand that unstable is right out for this
stable.
testing has the disadvantage that it could be broken and you could
wait for security updates _much_ longer than peopl
I run a small server, does http/ssh/imap, pretty much just for me. Yes,
smtp is locked down. No spam from here :-P.
I was wondering what version of Debian people prefer for servers?
Stable, or testing. I understand that unstable is right out for this
sort of application, even though thats what I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:19:10AM -0400, Shaun ONeil wrote:
> Possibly not the quickest, but my favoured solution to this is to visit
> snapshot.debian.net and find a version from just before I experienced
> breakages - or if you have the space, not c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:13:25PM +0200, Grzesiek Sedek wrote:
> I run my system as unstable, but in certain situations (i.e. recent
> Evolution Segfault or Mozilla problem on ppc) I'd like downgrade certain
> programs back to testing or stable - unti
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:19:10 +, Shaun ONeil wrote:
> A cleaner method appears to be "apt pinning", but I have little to no
> idea how this works - I'd suggest searching the archives.
There is a fair explanation at the Apt HOWTO manual.
--
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
-
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 06:13, Grzesiek Sedek wrote:
> Hi,
> I run my system as unstable, but in certain situations (i.e. recent
> Evolution Segfault or Mozilla problem on ppc) I'd like downgrade certain
> programs back to testing or stable - until the problem is resolved. I know
> that it is possibl
Hi,
I run my system as unstable, but in certain situations (i.e. recent
Evolution Segfault or Mozilla problem on ppc) I'd like downgrade certain
programs back to testing or stable - until the problem is resolved. I know
that it is possible so could anyone point me to a document about it or
show me
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 10:56, nate wrote:
> i was wondering if anyone knew of good alternatives to
> minicom that are available in testing or woody(or i suppose
> 3rd party). looking for something with better ANSI support
> and needs to support serial connections. don't need modem
> support(th
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, nate wrote:
> i was wondering if anyone knew of good alternatives to
> minicom that are available in testing or woody(or i suppose
> 3rd party). looking for something with better ANSI support
> and needs to support serial connections. don't need modem
> support(though with s
m is the Aspect scripting
language.
Hope this helps,
John Purser
http://solarflow.dyndns.org/pcplus/
-Original Message-
From: nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:56
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: alternatives to minicom in debian stable or testing?
i was wondering if anyone knew of good alternatives to
minicom that are available in testing or woody(or i suppose
3rd party). looking for something with better ANSI support
and needs to support serial connections. don't need modem
support(though with serial i suppose its standard). mainly
for null
32 matches
Mail list logo
