Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-13 Thread Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
X-Authentication-Warning: dakota.gate.net: storm owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:42:06 -0500 (EST) From: Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 12 Jan 1998, Pedro Quaresma de Almeida wrote: Hi I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice programs are

Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
Hi I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice programs are working correctly. I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try... StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool Segmentation fault (core dumped) Can

Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Scott Ellis
On 12 Jan 1998, Pedro Quaresma de Almeida wrote: Hi I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice programs are working correctly. I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try... StarOffice3.1

Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try... This probably isn't the answer you're looking for, but I solved this by using star office 4 rather than 3 . . . rick -- These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-12 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: Bob Nielsen wrote, I think the requirement is : 5.4.4. In anycase, it works fine for me with 5.4.33. The next magic question, is are you using hamm or bo, and should it make a difference? I'm using bo, but I don't think that will be a

staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Rick Hawkins
When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool Segmentation fault Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 is necessary. Debian seems to stop at .33. However, there's enough

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool Segmentation fault Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 is necessary.

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Mike
take me off this list! Bob Nielsen wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool Segmentation fault Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Mike
take me off this list! Bob Nielsen wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool Segmentation fault Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Rick Hawkins
Bob Nielsen wrote, I think the requirement is : 5.4.4. In anycase, it works fine for me with 5.4.33. The next magic question, is are you using hamm or bo, and should it make a difference? rick -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Alan Su
This is odd...the level of civility on this list is astounding. On any other list I've been on, if someone were to write this, they would immediately be ``punished''. this is almost disconcerting...=) Mike wrote (Thu, 11 Dec 1997 15:49:27 -0600 ): |take me off this list! | Mike, and anyone