Re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread tomas
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:31:46AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50 > > From: Jochen Spieker > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: taming lsblk command > > > >

Re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:31:46AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > jude[~]$ lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort > sda 8:00 111.8G 0 disk > ??sda1 8:10 111.8G 0 part / > ??sda2 8:20 32.5M 0 part [SWAP] > sdb 8:16 0 55.9G 0 disk > ??sdb1 8:17 055G 0 part > sr

Re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50 > From: Jochen Spieker > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: taming lsblk command > > Jude DaShiell: > > what works over here: > > lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort > > This com

Re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
It would if you had entered it backward. Now I'm going to have to do a typescript for you. On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50 > From: Jochen Spieker > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: taming lsblk command > > Jude D

Re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread Jochen Spieker
Jude DaShiell: > what works over here: > lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort This command feeds the content of the file /usr/bin/sort into stdin of lsblk. That does not make sense and I guess lsblk is just ignoring this input. J. -- I enjoy shopping, eating, sex and doing jigsaw puzzles of idealised landsc

re: taming lsblk command

2019-01-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
what works over here: lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort --