On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:31:46AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50
> > From: Jochen Spieker
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: taming lsblk command
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:31:46AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> jude[~]$ lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort
> sda 8:00 111.8G 0 disk
> ??sda1 8:10 111.8G 0 part /
> ??sda2 8:20 32.5M 0 part [SWAP]
> sdb 8:16 0 55.9G 0 disk
> ??sdb1 8:17 055G 0 part
> sr
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50
> From: Jochen Spieker
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: taming lsblk command
>
> Jude DaShiell:
> > what works over here:
> > lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort
>
> This com
It would if you had entered it backward. Now I'm going to have to do a
typescript for you.
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50
> From: Jochen Spieker
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: taming lsblk command
>
> Jude D
Jude DaShiell:
> what works over here:
> lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort
This command feeds the content of the file /usr/bin/sort into stdin of
lsblk. That does not make sense and I guess lsblk is just ignoring this
input.
J.
--
I enjoy shopping, eating, sex and doing jigsaw puzzles of idealised
landsc
what works over here:
lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort
--
6 matches
Mail list logo