On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 03:11:22PM -0300, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 03/17/07 12:33, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> Pardon me if I say something stupid, but I don't know why tar cannot just
> 1)run the .tar.rz file through
On 3/17/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/07 12:33, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
>>
>> - tar has been around forever
>> - tar is standard on pretty much every *nix system (which GNU tar
>>becoming more common even on com
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:26:40 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:16:04 +0200
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:08:08 -0400
> > Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/07 12:33, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
>>
>> - tar has been around forever
>> - tar is standard on pretty much every *nix system (which GNU tar
>>becoming more common even on commercial Unices)
>
> Tar is easily available even on W
- tar has been around forever
- tar is standard on pretty much every *nix system (which GNU tar
becoming more common even on commercial Unices)
Tar is easily available even on Windows. Good programs like 7-zip and many,
many others, can handle tar well.
- gzip provides better compression th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:16:04 +0200
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:08:08 -0400
> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > What is Linuxs "obsession" with tar ? What is (are) the advantage
> > (s) of tar
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:08:08 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM EST, Adam Porter wrote:
> > I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> > still can't figure out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/07 11:08, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM EST, Adam Porter wrote:
>> I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
>> still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
>
>> $ tar xjf *.tar
On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:08, Frank McCormick wrote:
> What is Linuxs "obsession" with tar ? What is (are) the advantage(s) of
> tar over ZIP/RAR for example.
it works, that's all.
ZIP and RAR aren't available everywhere and, AFAIK, are unable to represent
UNIX permissions.
Also, the separ
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:08:08PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM EST, Adam Porter wrote:
> > I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> > still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
> >
> > $ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
> > tar: beryl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM EST, Adam Porter wrote:
> I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
>
> $ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
> tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found i
Op do 25-09-2003, om 02:08 schreef Erik Steffl:
> Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my server setup is nearing completion and of course i want to save my
> > hard work in case something goes wrong. Since i have problems in the
> > past with various backup programs like mondo to name one, i
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Hi,
my server setup is nearing completion and of course i want to save my
hard work in case something goes wrong. Since i have problems in the
past with various backup programs like mondo to name one, i want to keep
it simple this time so a moronic me can understand whats
Hi,
my server setup is nearing completion and of course i want to save my
hard work in case something goes wrong. Since i have problems in the
past with various backup programs like mondo to name one, i want to keep
it simple this time so a moronic me can understand whats happening :)
1) Method 1
hi ya alan
one day... i'll go play with --backup option to rsync
- another to add to the todo list
from when i was using rsync, i think the default is NOT
to do a delete ... that if its deleted from the master,
that the rsync target does NOT delete it too
rsync --delete will del
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 3:12 am, Alvin Oga wrote:
> rsync
.> possible bad stuff
> - if the master erased foo.txt, the backup will also be erased
Not if you use the --backup --backup-dir options. In fact I use these to
create an incre
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Auke Jilderda wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:19:11PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Read the following page, then modify the associated script to your
> > system. It's geared toward tape. For drive-to-drive, I'd suggest rsync
> > rather than tar.
> Why?
that
17 matches
Mail list logo