testing/unstable reccomendation

2003-09-08 Thread Joey Harrison
I understand there are no security updates for testing/unstable, because they are so fluid, but what exactly is the difference between them and, between the two, which is more reliable and better for someone who wants bleeding-edge packages that have at least a safe level of critical bugs? =

Re: testing/unstable reccomendation

2003-09-08 Thread Greg Madden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 September 2003 09:14 am, Joey Harrison wrote: I understand there are no security updates for testing/unstable, because they are so fluid, but what exactly is the difference between them and, between the two, which is more reliable and

Re: testing/unstable reccomendation

2003-09-08 Thread David Z Maze
Joey Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I understand there are no security updates for testing/unstable, because they are so fluid, but what exactly is the difference between them Developers upload packages to unstable. Those are available to users who follow unstable within 24 hours. A