On Saturday, September 09, 2017 10:53:29 PM Nick Boyce wrote:
> AFAIK the 'Web Content' process was introduced by Mozilla when Firefox
> switched to a multi-process model for the browser binary - you may have
> seen people moaning about it: Mozilla calls it 'electrolysis/e10s' and it
> delivers suc
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 07:39:58 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 08, 2017 07:59:40 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 17:39:39 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > > Meanwhile, I have firefox op
On Friday, September 08, 2017 07:59:40 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 17:39:39 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, I have firefox open on the results of a google search.
> > > That's currently reading
On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 17:39:39 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote:
> > Meanwhile, I have firefox open on the results of a google search.
> > That's currently reading
> > firefox-esr 31% + Web Content 28%
>
> Hmm, do you have a version
On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote:
> Meanwhile, I have firefox open on the results of a google search.
> That's currently reading
> firefox-esr 31% + Web Content 28%
Hmm, do you have a version of top (or something else) which reports the use of
memory for web content?
5 matches
Mail list logo
