Re: uname -p and -i support?

2009-10-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <4ae7fad6.1090...@hardwarefreak.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >Any chance we might get uname -p or -i support any time soon? Should I >be asking this on another Debian list? Have you filed a wishlist bug against uname, or otherwise communicated to the maintainer(s) that this is a f

uname -p and -i support?

2009-10-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Any chance we might get uname -p or -i support any time soon? Should I be asking this on another Debian list? -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

uname -p?

2001-10-16 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On every Linux box I've ever used, uname -p prints 'unknown'. This has never affected me in the slightest, but every once in a while it occurs to me that I still have no idea what it means. I assume I could somehow make it print something i686 or something, although this is wh

uname -p

2000-06-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
I've been curious about this for a while now, but never bothered asking anybody. How do you set the 'processor type' that is printed when uname -p is run (or the last field in uname -a)? Is it used for anything other than informative purposes? noah PGP Public Key av