Hi guys,
I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
reasonable chance that this will not break anything (I'm only running
apache,
Hans du Plooy wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
reasonable chance that this will not break anything
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
just use that instead.
http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
and i'm
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
just use that instead.
http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have
Hi!
* Hans du Plooy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060507 20:25]:
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
and i'm really looking for 2.4. Guess I'll have to wait a little
longer.
Than you might try to create your own backported package by fetching the
source package and
Hans du Plooy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
reasonable chance that this will not break
Hi,
I have a Debian Hamm installed on my i386 machine, using glibc 2.0
and I really like to upgrade glibc to 2.1
but I followed the instruction from the GNU site, downloaded all the
linux-threads, crypt, binutils, etc... and compiled binutils statically
and then installed
Bill Shui [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and I really like to upgrade glibc to 2.1
but I followed the instruction from the GNU site, downloaded all the
any suggestions?
Yes: Next time use the debian packages from unstable when you want to
upgrade anything.
I don't know what
8 matches
Mail list logo