note: DO NOT DO THIS ON A PRODUCTION SYSTEM.
last week i was running an unsigned kernel and went to upgrade it
to a signed version and it came back with asking me about removing
a running kernel. in recent times that hasn't been and issue so i
aborted the install and then downloaded the desi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've inherited responsibility for a server running zabbix, which I
don't know much about. I've upgraded it from squeeze to wheezy, but
there are no wheezy packages, so it's still running the squeeze ones.
There are wheezy-backports packages, s
Hello,
On 20/09/13 15:25, François Patte wrote:
> Le 20/09/2013 11:57, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
>> Hello List,
>>
>>
>> On 20/09/13 11:39, François Patte wrote:
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> I want to see if I can get rid of:
>>>
>>> (evince:14988): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
>>> /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.4/.
Le 20/09/2013 11:57, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
> Hello List,
>
>
> On 20/09/13 11:39, François Patte wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I want to see if I can get rid of:
>>
>> (evince:14988): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
>> /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.4/./gobject/gsignal.c:2593: instance
>> `0x7f8d6310ed90' ha
Hello List,
On 20/09/13 11:39, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I want to see if I can get rid of:
>
> (evince:14988): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
> /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.4/./gobject/gsignal.c:2593: instance
> `0x7f8d6310ed90' has no handler with id `2342'
>
> (evince:14988): GLib-GObject
Bonjour,
I want to see if I can get rid of:
(evince:14988): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.4/./gobject/gsignal.c:2593: instance
`0x7f8d6310ed90' has no handler with id `2342'
(evince:14988): GLib-GObject-WARNING **:
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.4/./gobject/gsignal.c:2593: instance
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:09:09AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,29.Dec.08, 16:33:49, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> > > Could you please post the exact error message?
> > >
> > I don't know how to recover the information. I tried apt-get
> > --reinstall install live-helper and got an almos
On Mon,29.Dec.08, 16:33:49, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Could you please post the exact error message?
> >
> I don't know how to recover the information. I tried apt-get
> --reinstall install live-helper and got an almost immediate response
> "setting up live-helper". All I can report is that t
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:12:20PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,29.Dec.08, 14:08:59, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I ran update and dist-upgrade. The live-helper set up complained about
> > duplicate files in /usr/share/live-helper/includes.debian directory.
> > Checking I found the directo
On Mon,29.Dec.08, 14:08:59, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I ran update and dist-upgrade. The live-helper set up complained about
> duplicate files in /usr/share/live-helper/includes.debian directory.
> Checking I found the directory contained soft links from etch to sid and
> lenny to sid both dated 2
I ran update and dist-upgrade. The live-helper set up complained about
duplicate files in /usr/share/live-helper/includes.debian directory.
Checking I found the directory contained soft links from etch to sid and
lenny to sid both dated 2008-06-16 and a soft link from squeeze to lenny
dated 2008-1
> From: Mag Gam [mailto:magaw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:33 PM
> Subject: server upgrade question
>
> At my university we have 10 servers. Each server has 8 cores with 32
> GIG of memory running Debian 4.0. We have to give these servers to a
> diff
Mag Gam wrote:
At my university we have 10 servers. Each server has 8 cores with 32
GIG of memory running Debian 4.0. We have to give these servers to a
different department, and our Dean would like to consiladate 10
servers into 5 servers. The new server will have 16 cores with 64 GIG
of memory
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:33:09PM -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
> At my university we have 10 servers. Each server has 8 cores with 32
> GIG of memory running Debian 4.0. We have to give these servers to a
> different department, and our Dean would like to consiladate 10
> servers into 5 servers. The new
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:33:09PM -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
> At my university we have 10 servers. Each server has 8 cores with 32
> GIG of memory running Debian 4.0. We have to give these servers to a
> different department, and our Dean would like to consiladate 10
> servers into 5 servers. The new
At my university we have 10 servers. Each server has 8 cores with 32
GIG of memory running Debian 4.0. We have to give these servers to a
different department, and our Dean would like to consiladate 10
servers into 5 servers. The new server will have 16 cores with 64 GIG
of memory. Basically a 2:1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/07 06:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey all,
> i use debian sid (unstable) amd64 release and after a recent upgrade,
> gstreamer ugly library creates lots of problems with all sorts of
What does "gstreamer ugly library" mean?
> programs (ry
hey all,
i use debian sid (unstable) amd64 release and after a recent upgrade,
gstreamer ugly library creates lots of problems with all sorts of
programs (rythmbox and gnome baker for example)
how can i upgrade my gstreamer library the debian way??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 22:48:42 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:03:25PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > I've got one machine running Debian Sid that has not be upgraded in a
> > month or so. It's running a custom kernel I built who-knows-when
> > (2.6.6). Frankly, I can't
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:03:25PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I've got one machine running Debian Sid that has not be upgraded in a
> month or so. It's running a custom kernel I built who-knows-when
> (2.6.6). Frankly, I can't remember the reason for the custom kernel.
So am I wedged?
$ sudo
I've got one machine running Debian Sid that has not be upgraded in a
month or so. It's running a custom kernel I built who-knows-when
(2.6.6). Frankly, I can't remember the reason for the custom kernel.
But, I'm a bit concerned because I probably compiled most features
into the kernel and not as
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:20:55PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:01:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > The concern is that if something goes wrong with the upgrade, you may be
> > forced to do a reinstall. When I tried updating one of my boxes,
> > some
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > > > So why is
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:01:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> The concern is that if something goes wrong with the upgrade, you may be
> forced to do a reinstall. When I tried updating one of my boxes,
> something bad happened while dpkg was installing libc6 which left the
> whole syst
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, have yo
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >
> > > So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > Also, have you
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
>
> Yes.
>
> Also, have you read the release notes so you know where the bears are
> at?
No. Which relea
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
Yes.
Also, have you read the release notes so you know where the bears are
at?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
So upgrading an older PIII Toshiba laptop to etch, currently it has:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep kernel-image
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 2.6.8-16sarge1
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 2.6.8-16sarge1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2
Florian:
Many thanks. This is exaclty what i was looking for.
Paras.
On 7/10/06, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 18:56:14 +0545, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Yes i did using apt-get. I am using etch and have gnome 2.14 now.
>
> Is it possible to see t
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 18:56:14 +0545, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Yes i did using apt-get. I am using etch and have gnome 2.14 now.
>
> Is it possible to see the new related packages that can be upgraded
> using synaptic for main package gnome-core?
I don't know about synaptic, but if
Hello Paras!
> Yes i did using apt-get. I am using etch and have gnome 2.14 now.
>
> Is it possible to see the new related packages that can be upgraded
> using synaptic for main package gnome-core?
In synaptic you can see in status the upgradeable packages. But I thing
that you have the lastes v
Michael,
Yes i did using apt-get. I am using etch and have gnome 2.14 now.
Is it possible to see the new related packages that can be upgraded
using synaptic for main package gnome-core?
Thanks
Paras.
On 7/10/06, Michael Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Paras!
> I have a question regard
Hello Paras!
> I have a question regarding related packages upgrades.
>
>
> Four weeks back i upgraded my gnome 2.10 to gnome 2.14 using etch and
> command apt-get install gnome-core and upgradeed to gnome 2.14
> successfully.. At that time the related packages were still moving to
> the etch
Hello all:
I have a question regarding related packages upgrades.
Four weeks back i upgraded my gnome 2.10 to gnome 2.14 using etch and
command apt-get install gnome-core and upgradeed to gnome 2.14
successfully.. At that time the related packages were still moving to
the etch repo. Now when
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 + Magnus Therning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100 Florian Kulzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I wo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:47:01AM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
>Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>>
>>> Where is the list of installed packages kept on
>>>these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
> >Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Joey Hess wrote:
> >> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to
At 1142354731, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> If not, this is a good time to make coffee unless your
> internet connection is based on *insert super fast
> technology that is used by no debian mirror here*
My commercial ISP hosts a debian mirror so I get blazing
speeds at home: and I work at a UK Univ
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I
>can tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility
>bits included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second
>the Xwindows interfa
Jude DaShiell wrote:
[...]
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to download the missing packages? I think
First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I can
tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility bits
included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second the
Xwindows interface once I get it talking may enable multimedia access
conssole
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
>Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> >
>> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
>> >
>> >
>> > From WordNet
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've bee
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
> >
> >
> > From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
> >
> > unstable
> > ...
> > 6: subj
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following t
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following the coup"
[s
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
[..]
>> Step two is to edit /etc/apt/sources.list. This is the relevant part of
>> mine:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.uk
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:05:56 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an
> > unbootable initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I l
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an unbootable
> initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I learned to *always* keep a second
> kernel installed it still counts as a break.
Good point,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:42:47 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended update
Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> ive been running sid for 4 to 5 years and there have been glitches
> (maybe severe ones once a year), but by-in-large if i want to try new
^^^
The term is actually "by and large" and it is actually a nautical term.
Though, t
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year
and have never had anything break .
What is people's experience with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:47AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
>
> I'm curious
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year an
Jude DaShiell wrote:
What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable
using apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless
I figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
you put two questions. the first is: how to get xwindows working; and 2.
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
restricted ? I see no restrictions here. Just a little less eye candy *lol*
>
> First off, Sarge is the stable release
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable using
>apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
>figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
First off, Sarge is the stable rel
What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable using
apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I figure
out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:26:56AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask
> > > these questions.
> > >
> > > --force
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:26:56AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask
> > these questions.
> >
> > --force-confold and --force-confnew
> >
> > I wouldn't use --force-confnew,
Sam Watkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 02:57:53AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
>
> I just noticed there are some dpkg options that cause it not to ask
> these questions.
>
> --force-confold and --force-confnew
>
> I wouldn't use --force-confnew, but --f
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 02:57:53AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:31:32PM +1100, Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
> > What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian
> > sarge machines.
> >
> > I tired using
> >
> > apt-get update
> > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninterac
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:31:32PM +1100, Ivan Teliatnikov wrote:
> What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian
> sarge machines.
>
> I tired using
>
> apt-get update
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade
>
> Nevertheless I was asked some questions as
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041220 07:31]:
What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian
sarge machines.
Assuming you test it on one machine first, ...
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade
Nevertheless I was asked som
On 2004-12-20, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could run it with=20
> yes | DEBIAN_FRONTEND=3Dnoninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade
Actually it depends on the answer you want to give to this question (you
might want to use yes to flood the "no" string). Using yes is not an
* Ivan Teliatnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041220 07:31]:
> What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian
> sarge machines.
Assuming you test it on one machine first, ...
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade
>
> Nevertheless I was asked some questions as
What is the best way to "apt-get update" a classroom full of debian
sarge machines.
I tired using
apt-get update
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -uy dist-upgrade
Nevertheless I was asked some questions as follows:
Configuration file `/etc/profile'
==> Modified (by you or by a script)
--- Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If that's the case, then the new KDE / Gnome should
> "just work".
Yes...but that is the least of my problems now. I have
another thread going about some other more serious
issues after this "apt-get dist-upgrade".
> What is
> leading you to beli
On Sunday 10 October 2004 10:11, Eric Dickner wrote:
> --- Jule Slootbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > \* stupid question *\
> > i am safe to assume that you restarted gnome/kde
> > after you ran a
> > dist-upgrade correct?
>
> Yes, I restarted using the new "Sarge" kernel and
> everything.
>
> >
On Friday 08 October 2004 12:18 pm, Eric Dickner wrote:
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
Painful, innit? I did that when I upgraded from Woody to Sarge.
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing?
Not really, no.
> Can I then issue the command again and will it recognize the
> packcages it already g
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"jano kupec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
>> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
>> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
>
> apt keep
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT), Eric Dickner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
>
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing?
Usually not, eventually you'll find them in /va
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
apt keeps downloaded packages (usually) in /var/cache/apt/archives,
untill you decide to remove them with apt-get clean, so the are no
--- Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
If apt-get is interrupted, it'll continue from where it left off. Note
that you might f
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
>
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it
Hello,
For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
download, some 500 Meg...
Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
Will it check these downloads for errors with an md5
or
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:54:23 +0100
Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a dist-upgrade some X packages didn't install properly and now
> nedit doesn't work because it can't find libXp.so.6.
>
> If I ask aptitude to install the libXp package, it wants to remove 505
> packages, which d
After a dist-upgrade some X packages didn't install properly and now nedit
doesn't work because it can't find libXp.so.6.
If I ask aptitude to install the libXp package, it wants to remove 505
packages, which doesn't sound optimal.
Any suggestions?
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:51:43PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Frédéric Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
> > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
> > dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
> patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
> dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:15:49PM +0100, Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote:
> > I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
> > patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
> > dependant programs (apa
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote:
> I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
> patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
> dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the
> update effective?
Is
Hello Frédéric!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Frédéric Dreier wrote:
> I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
> patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
> dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the
> updat
Hi,
I just ran the update and have seen that some openssl libs have been
patched. My question is : should I restart ssh daemon and other
dependant programs (apache-ssl, exim-tsl, ...) in order to make the
update effective?
Thanks for your responses,
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
on Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:36:57PM -0400, Zerkani_user_list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Need help!
>
> When I ran the security upgrade, I get the following error message. How do I
> resolve this error?.
>
> localhost:/home/zerkani# apt-get upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building De
Need help!
When I ran the security upgrade, I get the following error message. How do I
resolve this error?.
localhost:/home/zerkani# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
21 packa
Hi Debianistas,
I have installed evolution 1.3 and some other packages that make
dist-upgrade want to remove lots of stuff. How do I tell it to ignore a
packages when I dist-upgrade.
-K
--
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thanks to all who responded. As usual, you can always
learn something new.
Thanks Again
Don
--- Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> > I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted
> to do
> > a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results o
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
> a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
> apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Friday, January 24, 2003 9:31 AM
>
> I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
> a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
> apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't I
> have lost my "Desktop" and only had text only mode?
Task packages are (were) empty packages containing only dependencies.
They do not pro
Hi all,
I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
My questions is why is it trying to remove the
task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't I
have lost my "Desktop" and only had text only mode?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:10:56PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
> In the course of a recent Debian testing apt-get upgrade, without using
> the -u option, a number of packages were upgraded. I discovered that one
> of these turned out to be kernel-source-2.4.19. Since I only have one
> kernel-sour
In the course of a recent Debian testing apt-get upgrade, without using
the -u option, a number of packages were upgraded. I discovered that one
of these turned out to be kernel-source-2.4.19. Since I only have one
kernel-source-2.4.19 directory on my machine, I assume that it just
overwrote what
> "Patrick" == Patrick Dahiroc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> are the packages sysvinit and linux-util suppose to be
Patrick> removed when upgrading from potato to woody?
Patrick> apt-get gave me the warning:
Patrick> WARNING: The following essential packages will be re
are the packages sysvinit and linux-util suppose to be
removed when upgrading from potato to woody?
apt-get gave me the warning:
WARNING: The following essential packages will be
removed
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what
you are doing!
sysvinit util-linux (due to sysvinit)
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
