Thanks to everyone who helped answer my questions.
I found that when I installed the stable versions of the packages I tried
to upgrade to unstable dselect didn't want to remove all those packages
any more.
--
Ulrik Haugen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in
On 21-Apr-99 Ulrik Haugen wrote:
I followed a link to
http://www.uk.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2
It said one ought to upgrade a few packages to the unstable versions
to run a 2.2.x kernel.
I downloaded these and ran dpkg -i package.deb,
downloaded a few more as dpkg
* Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unstable is now based on a new glibc. So if you want to migrate to it, tell
dselect (or apt) to update based on the unstable directory and download the 40
- 80 some megs of updated packages.
I'm afraid I choose a rather misleading subject, I'm not sure I want to
Ulrik Haugen wrote:
* Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unstable is now based on a new glibc. So if you want to migrate to it, tell
dselect (or apt) to update based on the unstable directory and download the
40
- 80 some megs of updated packages.
I'm afraid I choose a rather misleading
ktb wrote:
Ulrik Haugen wrote:
* Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unstable is now based on a new glibc. So if you want to migrate to it,
tell
dselect (or apt) to update based on the unstable directory and download
the 40
- 80 some megs of updated packages.
I'm afraid I choose
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 11:59:40AM +, Ulrik Haugen wrote:
* Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unstable is now based on a new glibc. So if you want to migrate to it, tell
dselect (or apt) to update based on the unstable directory and download the
40
- 80 some megs of updated packages.
I'm
I followed a link to
http://www.uk.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2
It said one ought to upgrade a few packages to the unstable versions
to run a 2.2.x kernel.
I downloaded these and ran dpkg -i package.deb,
downloaded a few more as dpkg complaind about dependencies, and
when I
7 matches
Mail list logo
