Re: off topic: uptime question

> This function is made for the formatting of *dates*, not *time intervals. > > That would mean that you might get even funnier results if your uptime > is more than (around) 30-31 days. I did understand. For now my chromebook uptime is over 30 days, thanks! Sincerely, Byung-Hee. --

Re: off topic: uptime question

In Article <17430759904711630...@scdbackup.webframe.org>, "Thomas Schmitt" writes: > [...] > (You should better compute the time interval days from the seconds > difference. %d will probably rollover at 31.) Thank you for good point, indeed;;; Sincerely, Byung-Hee. -- ^고맙습니다 _白衣從軍_ 감사합니다_^)

Re: off topic: uptime question

Hi, Byung-Hee wrote: > uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strftime("%d days %H:%M") > Ruby: 28 days 09:23 (Tue Sep 26 15:19:58 +0900 2017) > Bash: 00:43:33 up 27 days, 9:23, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 0.10, 0.21 Google sent me to https://apidock.com/ruby/DateTime/strftim

Re: off topic: uptime question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:50:03AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote: > #+BEGIN_SRC ruby > require "date" > > uptime_data = IO.read('/proc/uptime').split[0].to_i > sboot = Time.now - uptime_data > &g

off topic: uptime question

#+BEGIN_SRC ruby require "date" uptime_data = IO.read('/proc/uptime').split[0].to_i sboot = Time.now - uptime_data if uptime_data >= 86400 uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strftime("%d days %H:%M") else uptime = Time.at(uptime_data).utc.strfti

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Having a long uptime is fine if you run a system not on the Internet. If you are on the Internet, then a long uptime is like being proud of not having read a newspaper for that many days. Uptime used to be significant over a decade ago, when some systems were recommended to reboot periodically

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

I have a box at work that has an uptime of: 12:32:00 up 1971 days, 18:32, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:10 PM, David Parker wrote: > I have a box running Etch that hasn't been rebooted in 1,589 days: > > irp:~# uptime > 12:09:06 up 158

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > My laptop is at 112 days. Of course it hasn't actually been "on" all > of those days. My cat managed to trigger an emergency read-only remount of all filesystems via sysrq, so I took this as an opportunity to update the kernel and

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

I have a box running Etch that hasn't been rebooted in 1,589 days: irp:~# uptime 12:09:06 up 1589 days, 18:23, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.03 irp:~# I swear this is real. :-) On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-04-20 19:24:00 -0600, Bob Prou

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 2013-04-20 19:24:00 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > That's theory. In practice, old machines get no longer supported... > > I submitted a bug report (and a patch), but AFAIK the bug has never > > been fixed. I upgraded everything except the kernel, without being > > sure I

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > I don't think uptime challenges are useful. It makes people want to > > do something that they shouldn't want to do. When kernel security > > upgrades come along just install them and reboot. > > That'

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Chris Bannister wrote: > Over here in New Zealand, power switch up equals power off. I noticed that behavior when visiting your beautiful country! But I figured that since it was on the south side of the planet that the switches pointed toward the south pole for off and toward the north pole for

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

> > > > OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade > > which is nice for uptime. > > Let's not get carried away here. I was under the impression that > openbsd was one of the best things since sliced bread ... then I read > this: > ht

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:22:18PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade which is > nice for uptime. Let's not get carried away here. I was under the impression that openbsd was one of the best things since sliced bread .

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:00:01AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >From now on I *will* use male genital analogies, using "phallus", > "phalli", and "phallic", the academically correct words for describing > the sociological phenomenon. Then you can sit there and squirm in your > chair screaming lo

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:45:21AM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: > > In 1992 I worked late after usual office hours on my laptop (an IBM > 386) connected to the power supply and battery removed (to save > lifetime of the battery). > > Then the cleaning woman stepped in and asked: "May I vac

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:18:15PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On the humor side though I rememeber a story about a guy who moved his > > apartment. His machine was on a UPS. He determined a way to borrow a > > second UPS and daisy chain them for more uptime and then drove

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 06:24:33PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Lars Noodén: > > > > Oracle hasn't been the best steward for the other FOSS projects […] > > You are hereby given the Understatement of the Year Award! And it's only April!! :-D -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will hav

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 2013-04-18 10:56:53 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > I don't think uptime challenges are useful. It makes people want to > do something that they shouldn't want to do. When kernel security > upgrades come along just install them and reboot. That's theory. In practice, ol

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/19/2013 9:09 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Second, your methodology doesn't scale. For large scale operations >> installing new kernel patches every few weeks simply isn't financially >> feasible/responsible. Even a junior adm

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/19/2013 8:59 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > I'll accept that you intended to use the phrase in the meaning you suggest, > here, in the spirit of good faith, but I'm sure you are fully aware that > the phrase is more widely known and used in a different way which is > objectionable. It's theref

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/19/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 4/19/13, Jonathan Dowland wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> This isn't a manhood measurement contest. >> >> Let's avoid alienating some debian-user readers with such language. > > Oh, c'mon! Grow some ovaries alrea

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Apr 19, 2013 8:11 PM, "Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote: > > Whatever I see in all your comments is this: > > Most of the people show a big uptime. 100 days, 400 days, 500 days, even more > than a 1000 days! So many people do this. It proves, how stable a good system > can be

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Whatever I see in all your comments is this: Most of the people show a big uptime. 100 days, 400 days, 500 days, even more than a 1000 days! So many people do this. It proves, how stable a good system can be and it also shows the great work of the developers. If I compare it to other

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Second, your methodology doesn't scale. For large scale operations > installing new kernel patches every few weeks simply isn't financially > feasible/responsible. Even a junior admin's salary is better spent on > things other than

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:57:50AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > You obviously misread my statement, apparently because your mind is in > the gutter. It had nothing to do with male sexual organ size, as you > have obviously and incorrectly assumed. If your beef was instead > strictly with my use

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/19/13, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> This isn't a manhood measurement contest. > > Let's avoid alienating some debian-user readers with such language. Oh, c'mon! Grow some ovaries already... :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/19/2013 1:56 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> This isn't a manhood measurement contest. > > Let's avoid alienating some debian-user readers with such language. Instead let's get you straightened out. You obviously misread my sta

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

> The security related flaws are typically in > subsystems that are not part of a minimalist kernel. A reboot is an attackers best friend and potentially an attackers enemy too. However whilst your practice is right. I hope you are reviewing all bugs as the kernel devs simply label them as bugs

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am 18.04.2013 um 20:33 schrieb Bob Proulx: Kevin Chadwick wrote: Well I wouldn't go that far but I have taken the insert of a matchbox cut a slot in it and stuck it over the power button so that when reaching round the back there is no way of holding it down by accident. Protecting the pow

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:31:35PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > This isn't a manhood measurement contest. Let's avoid alienating some debian-user readers with such language. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/18/2013 11:56 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: > I don't think uptime challenges are useful. It makes people want to > do something that they shouldn't want to do. Uptime is about continuous availability and reliability of infrastructure, systems, and software, with least disrupti

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

> every 6 months: > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors > > So that would tend to limit the uptime. > > Regards, > /Lars Yes and No. Supported (help you in case of problems) certainly as the man power simply isn't there to back port and all the devs r

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Well I wouldn't go that far but I have taken the insert of a matchbox > cut a slot in it and stuck it over the power button so that when > reaching round the back there is no way of holding it down by accident. Protecting the power switch from accidentally switching off is

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

> On the humor side though I rememeber a story about a guy who moved his > apartment. His machine was on a UPS. He determined a way to borrow a > second UPS and daisy chain them for more uptime and then drove like a > madman halfway to his new place where he had previously scouted a

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

> > OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade which is > > nice for uptime. > > Two holes in the default install, which is a very different thing to two > holes in the entire distribution. It is but you can see the erratas for the whole base

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:56:53AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > I don't think uptime challenges are useful. It makes people want to > do something that they shouldn't want to do. When kernel security > upgrades come along just install them and reboot. Human made > "

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2013 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > > On 2013-04-17 17:22:32 +1030, John Elliot wrote: > > > $ uptime 16:51:12 up 1136 days, 17:01, 1 user, load average: 0.22, > > > 0.12, 0.08 > > > > I got on 2012-11-01:

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thursday 18 April 2013 14:33:51 green wrote: > Darac Marjal wrote at 2013-04-18 04:05 -0500: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:43:27PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > > Security issues, which affect modules, but not the kernel itself, may > > > not cause the need of a new kernel. When people lik

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2013 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > On 2013-04-17 17:22:32 +1030, John Elliot wrote: > > $ uptime 16:51:12 up 1136 days, 17:01, 1 user, load average: 0.22, > > 0.12, 0.08 > > I got on 2012-11-01: > > 10:48:16 up 1150 days, 8:00, 1 user, loa

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux > 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 mondschein:~> uprecords # Uptime | System

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > My laptop is at 112 days. Of course it hasn't actually been "on" all > of those days. Had about 200 days on a hibernating workstation at work. And its nice in Juni or July to type who and see 18 Apr as login time for display :0 :) Ciao, --

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Darac Marjal wrote at 2013-04-18 04:05 -0500: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:43:27PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Security issues, which affect modules, but not the kernel itself, may not > > cause > > the need of a new kernel. When people lik me and others on this list, are > > using a very

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:22:18PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade which is > nice for uptime. Two holes in the default install, which is a very different thing to two holes in the entire distribution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: >Not really. uptime reports the amount of time elapsed since the >system was booted, but I've noticed it is not paused for suspend >and hibernation. Yes: $ uprecords # Uptime | System

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 2013-04-17 17:22:32 +1030, John Elliot wrote: > $ uptime 16:51:12 up 1136 days, 17:01, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.12, > 0.08 I got on 2012-11-01: 10:48:16 up 1150 days, 8:00, 1 user, load average: 0.83, 0.69, 0.31 But then there was a disk failure and the machine is no

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:43:27PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > It is interesting. Whenever I someone is telling of big uptime, the arguiment > is: > [cut] > > 2. Security issues > > But a kernel can stay very, verry long time. On machines, where you do not > chang

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, agroconsultor0 wrote: > On 04/17/2013 01:22 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: [snip] > > OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade which is > > nice for uptime. > > If i am not mistaken, The OpenBSD Team recommends a clean installation every

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

s only had something like two holes in over a decade which is nice for uptime. If i am not mistaken, The OpenBSD Team recommends a clean installation every 6 month. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Linux STRUMMER 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 21 03:36:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux 22:46:24 up 272 days, 14:08, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.10, 1.07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 04:02:45 -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 4/17/2013 1:10 AM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Tixy: > >> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 22:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >>> Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux > >>> > >>>

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: On Qua, 17 Abr 2013, Bob Proulx wrote: I believe linux only accrues uptime when it is on and running. Suspended it will pause the uptime. Resumed it will start ticking again. Not really. uptime reports the amount of time elapsed since the system was booted, but

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

somewhere around 700 days, just short of 2 years. Then we had a power outage that burned through the UPS and the laptop battery... On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > It is interesting. Whenever I someone is telling of big uptime, the > arguiment > is: > >

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

It is interesting. Whenever I someone is telling of big uptime, the arguiment is: Your server can not be secure! You have an old kernel! You MUST install/update the newest kernel and of course reboot. But this is not correct. For which reason a new kernel is necessary? 1. If there are

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

strictions, perhaps grsecurity prevented it from being used which made sense to me. OpenBSD has only had something like two holes in over a decade which is nice for uptime. -- ___ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Qua, 17 Abr 2013, Bob Proulx wrote: I believe linux only accrues uptime when it is on and running. Suspended it will pause the uptime. Resumed it will start ticking again. Not really. uptime reports the amount of time elapsed since the system was booted, but I've noticed it is not p

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Jonathan Dowland wrote: > My laptop is at 112 days. Of course it hasn't actually been "on" all > of those days. If that is the kernel reported uptime then I think it has been on all of those reported uptime days. I believe linux only accrues uptime when it is on and runnin

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:41:12 +0300 (EEST) > Lars Noodén wrote: > > Hello Lars, > > >What's the status of ksplice in Debian? Oracle hasn't been the best > > TBH, I don't know. It's in testing at v0.9.9-4. How that compares with > upstream, I'm not su

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:24:33 +0200 Jochen Spieker wrote: Hello Jochen, >Lars Noodén: >> Oracle hasn't been the best steward for the other FOSS projects […] >You are hereby given the Understatement of the Year Award! :-)) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:41:12 +0300 (EEST) Lars Noodén wrote: Hello Lars, >What's the status of ksplice in Debian? Oracle hasn't been the best TBH, I don't know. It's in testing at v0.9.9-4. How that compares with upstream, I'm not sure, as the Oracle web site seems reluctant to let me find o

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Lars Noodén: > > Oracle hasn't been the best steward for the other FOSS projects […] You are hereby given the Understatement of the Year Award! J. -- I have been manipulated and permanently distorted. [Agree] [Disagree]

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/17/13 3:12 PM, Brad Rogers wrote: [snip] > ksplice can be used for security patching the kernel. [snip] What's the status of ksplice in Debian? Oracle hasn't been the best steward for the other FOSS projects and it's been a while since ksplice was in the news. Regards, /Lars -- To UNSUB

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:59:45 + Bonno Bloksma wrote: Hello Bonno, >Now I applaud a long uptime but... After a kernel upgrade or a Debian >point release one must or should do a reboot or the updates are not >applied so.. ksplice can be used for security patching the kernel. This

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

My laptop is at 112 days. Of course it hasn't actually been "on" all of those days. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130417115728.GE19117@debian

RE: what's your Debian uptime?

Hello hans, > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >> Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux >> 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 > > Great, but beat this! More than 500 days. At about 650 d

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On 4/17/2013 1:10 AM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Tixy: >> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 22:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux >>> >>> 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44

RE: what's your Debian uptime?

$ uptime 16:51:12 up 1136 days, 17:01, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.12, 0.08 From: hans.ullr...@loop.de To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: what's your Debian uptime? Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:58:31 +0200 Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > Linux greer

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Tixy: > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 22:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux > > > > 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 > > So you are over a year behind in installi

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 22:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux > 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 So you are over a year behind in installing security updates for the kernel. (I know, if your mach

Re: what's your Debian uptime?

Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux > 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 Great, but beat this! More than 500 days. At about 650 days uptime I rebooted accidentlly. S

what's your Debian uptime?

Linux greer 3.2.6 #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 17:05:10 CST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux 22:35:31 up 412 days, 10:05, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 0.97, 0.44 -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org A

Re: idle time vs uptime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 lost butler wrote: > Hi Folks, > > The other day, I had posted message about sar/top misreporting idle > times. I came across the command procinfo which gives this info. > > The idle time seems wrong. It is almost 4 times the upti

idle time vs uptime

Hi Folks, The other day, I had posted message about sar/top misreporting idle times. I came across the command procinfo which gives this info. The idle time seems wrong. It is almost 4 times the uptime which doesn't make sense to me. sysutils: 1.3.8.5.1 sysstat 5.0.6 sarge I would appre

Re: bandwidth and uptime graphs

On 08/06/06 22:28 PM, Bryan Fr?chette wrote: > Hi i would like to know if anyone has a php app that can show bandwidth > and uptime graphs or ping graphs on a website, if anyone has an idea, > thank you > http://cricket.sf.net and http://www.cacti.net/ are two more rrdtool based pack

Re: bandwidth and uptime graphs

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:58:48AM +0800, shell wrote: > Bryan FrŽchette ??: > >Hi i would like to know if anyone has a php app that can show bandwidth > >and uptime graphs or ping graphs on a website, if anyone has an idea, > >thank you > > > >Bryan Fre

Re: bandwidth and uptime graphs

those along with rrdtool and snmp data collection are a good start.the more effort you put into it the better results you'll get out of it!On 8/6/06, shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bryan FrŽchette 写道:> Hi i would like to know if anyone has a php app that can show bandwidth> and

Re: bandwidth and uptime graphs

Bryan FrŽchette 写道: Hi i would like to know if anyone has a php app that can show bandwidth and uptime graphs or ping graphs on a website, if anyone has an idea, thank you Bryan Frechette try mrtg or ntop package. -- 与其相濡以沫，不如相忘于江湖 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

bandwidth and uptime graphs

Hi i would like to know if anyone has a php app that can show bandwidth and uptime graphs or ping graphs on a website, if anyone has an idea, thank you Bryan Frechette -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: monitoring network uptime

If you setup an apache server...you might wana check out several php scripts available online which might provide you with all the info you requested..check out darkstat and check out...systeminfoand others...On 6/9/06, Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks,I have a server running in a

monitoring network uptime

Hi folks, I have a server running in a University netowrk, and it periodically becomes inaccessible for hours at a time. I've spoken the the network admins, who aren't exactly linux- friendly, and they insist the problem must be with my box (I htink it's something to do with the ethernet jack & t

How come idle time > uptime

Hi, When I ran "w" command, I was so surprised to find that the idle time is 3 times bigger as the uptime. How come? $ w 15:11:10 up 61 days, 1:20, 4 users, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT roo

something wrong with 'who' 'w' 'uptime'

Hello, i have the following problem: When i typ 'w' he gives me 2 users logged in.(correct) When i typ 'who' he gives me all the users from the past 5-6 days. When i typ 'uptime' he says 16 users logged in. I saw some stuff about it, googled the whole day, somethi

Somewhat OT - Uptime Girl

Just recently posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy http://home.student.utwente.nl/r.j.audenaerde/uptimegirl/ A nice little spoof of the ol' tune, Uptown girl. I think the folks who recorded this did a pretty admirable job of it. :D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Network/DSL uptime log? solution is icpld

Internet Connection Performance Log Daemon icpld is a nice solution. I found no Debian package that logs when internet connections cease working, although this may be included as a minor aspect of some Debian package having broader purposes. I found this package at http://freshmeat.net/projec

Network/DSL uptime log?

I look for a command/daemon that will keep a history of my DSL-connection downtime. My Verizon ADSL connection has been down about 60% of the time for 3 weeks, so I want to log the actual downtimes. For example, in a file like /var/log/eth1-downtime I would like to see lines like June 2 10:

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

Rich Johnson wrote: On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 12:24 AM, Jacob Anawalt wrote: Everytime I think about this thread or any boast about uptime one question comes into my mind: Are these machines on trusted networks with trusted users, or do people really get lucky and pick or compile a

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

. is there anything I can do so that the uptime will be retained? Why? Your uptime is the amount of time your machine has been running, not the output of the uptime command. Just because you overflow a 32-bit number with it, it doesn't mean your machine is any less stable. one

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

t; > > > > > > > > > the other system is at 486 days 16 hours 36 minutes, and I expect that it will > > > > do the rollover in another 11 days. > > > > is there anything I can do so that the uptime will be retained? > > > > > >

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

t; > > > > > the other system is at 486 days 16 hours 36 minutes, and I expect that it will > > > > do the rollover in another 11 days. > > > > is there anything I can do so that the uptime will be retained? > > > > > > Why? Your uptime is the am

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:54, csj wrote: > At Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:23:28 -0500, > Ron Johnson wrote: > > [...] > > > Not a bug, but the limitation of 32-bit integers. The kernel > > "ticker" has a resolution of 1/100th of a second. Thus, a > > little math will show you that it takes 497 days, 2 h

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

At Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:23:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: [...] > Not a bug, but the limitation of 32-bit integers. The kernel > "ticker" has a resolution of 1/100th of a second. Thus, a > little math will show you that it takes 497 days, 2 hours, 27 > minutes and 53 seconds worth of 1/100th of a

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

pect that it will > > > do the rollover in another 11 days. > > > is there anything I can do so that the uptime will be retained? > > > > Why? Your uptime is the amount of time your machine has been running, > > not the output of the uptime command. Just because you

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

hi ya On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * Kyle Loree ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030929 08:58]: > > > > the other system is at 486 days 16 hours 36 minutes, and I expect that it will > > do the rollover in another 11 days. > > is there anything I can do so that

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:02, Sebastian Kapfer wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:50:16 +0200, Vineet Kumar wrote: > > > Why? Your uptime is the amount of time your machine has been running, > > not the output of the uptime command. Just because you overflow a > > 32-bit nu

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:50:16 +0200, Vineet Kumar wrote: > Why? Your uptime is the amount of time your machine has been running, > not the output of the uptime command. Just because you overflow a > 32-bit number with it, it doesn't mean your machine is any less stable. BTW,

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

* Kyle Loree ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030929 08:58]: > I have two Debian severs that were installed on kernel 2.2.x and are now > 2.4.17-686-smp. > > one has seemed to have been restarted. > 09:41:45 up 2 days, 4:26, > > in reading http://e-zine.nluug.nl/hold.html?cid=158

Re: Debian uptime 497 days

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:49, Kyle Loree wrote: > I have two Debian severs that were installed on kernel 2.2.x and are > now 2.4.17-686-smp. > > one has seemed to have been restarted. > 09:41:45 up 2 days, 4:26, > > in reading http://e-zine.nluug.nl/hold.html?cid=158 th

Debian uptime 497 days

I have two Debian severs that were installed on kernel 2.2.x and are now 2.4.17-686-smp. one has seemed to have been restarted. 09:41:45 up 2 days,  4:26, in reading http://e-zine.nluug.nl/hold.html?cid=158  the uptime returns to zero after 497 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes and 53 seconds it

Re: no days in uptime

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 04:09, Sebastiaan wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Florian Ernst wrote: > > > Hello Sebastiaan! > > > > At Wednesday 30 July 2003 08:50 Sebastiaan wrote: > > > > > > For some reason, after 497 days the upti

Re: no days in uptime

Hi, On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello Sebastiaan! > > At Wednesday 30 July 2003 08:50 Sebastiaan wrote: > > > For some reason, after 497 days the uptime doesn't return day > > information any more: > > > > $ uptime > > 08:36:0

  1   2   >