Sandip P Deshmukh([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:05:47PM +0100, Chris Niekel wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > > > hello all
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:05:47PM +0100, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > > hello all
> > >
> > > after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
> >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > hello all
> >
> > after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
>
> I experienced this also. The whitelist won't help, since the message
>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:28:29PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:57:59AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> | On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> | > If you use spamc, which is the daemonized version of spamassassin, it
> | > will run
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:57:59AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
| > If you use spamc, which is the daemonized version of spamassassin, it
| > will run somewhat faster, since it is written in C rather than perl.
|
| i did dselect a
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:29:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:02:07AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 05:59:16PM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> > > It _might_ be that you installed razor (or razor2) (spamassassin uses razor
> > > if it
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:02:07AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 05:59:16PM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> > It _might_ be that you installed razor (or razor2) (spamassassin uses razor
> > if it is installed, by default).
>
> i did install razor. do you mean that
,etely
makes the spam filter more accurate.
Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandip P Deshmukh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday 17 December 2002 06:31
> To: DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> Cc: Debian User
> Subject: Re: urgent - system slow after spamassassin
>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:43:26PM -0600, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> The Debian list servers run spamassassin for you. You can configure
> things so that spamassassin is run only on messages not from a Debian
> list. That might reduce your load significantly.
>
> In my .procmailrc I first look for X-
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 05:59:16PM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> It _might_ be that you installed razor (or razor2) (spamassassin uses razor
> if it is installed, by default).
i did install razor. do you mean that if i remove razor, things will get
better? i was under an impression that spa
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > hello all
> >
> > after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
> > thought that it must be becasue spamd is trying to scan all messages. so
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> hello all
>
> after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
> thought that it must be becasue spamd is trying to scan all messages. so
> i modified ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs. here is how it looks:
I had s
"Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
Sandip> now i realize that this has hardly made any
Sandip> difference. for instance, messages from
Sandip> [EMAIL PROTECTED] appear to be coming from the
Sandip> sender.
The Debian list servers run spamassassin for you. You can configure
On Mon Dec 16, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, the boisterous
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote to me:
> If you use spamc, which is the daemonized version of spamassassin, it
> will run somewhat faster, since it is written in C rather than perl.
> It only helps a little, however, since it still need
ncent
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandip P Deshmukh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday 16 December 2002 07:59
> To: Debian User
> Subject: urgent - system slow after spamassassin
>
>
> hello all
>
> after installing spamassassin, my system has become
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> hello all
>
> after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
> thought that it must be becasue spamd is trying to scan all messages. so
> i modified ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs. here is how it looks:
>
> whi
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:07PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> hello all
>
> after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
Spamassassin consumes enormouse amounts of resources when scanning spam.
I ended up disabling it because it was so painful.
> thought that it mu
hello all
after installing spamassassin, my system has become terribly slow! i
thought that it must be becasue spamd is trying to scan all messages. so
i modified ~/.spamassassin/user-prefs. here is how it looks:
whitelist_from debian*
whitelist_from mutt*
whitelist_from vim*
now i realize that
18 matches
Mail list logo
