Jean-François Pirlet wrote:
This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from
any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is
uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are
lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance
existing mp3_files with 48Kbit 320Kbit.
my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality
[ceteris paribus]
google came up only with some hunches.
regards,
steef,
user with
2009/10/28 steef debian.li...@home.nl
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing
mp3_files with 48Kbit 320Kbit.
my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality
[ceteris paribus]
No.
You can achieve sound improvemente
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
2009/10/28 steef debian.li...@home.nl mailto:debian.li...@home.nl
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance
existing mp3_files with 48Kbit 320Kbit.
my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound
2009/10/28 steef debian.li...@home.nl
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing
mp3_files with 48Kbit 320Kbit.
Here's a good link that explains transcoding, which is what your question is
about:
This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from
any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is
uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are
lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to store
ID3 tag info
Jean-François Pirlet jf.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
The mp3 is to the CD what the abstract is to
the book, if you want. If you have the book, you can write the abstract,
but the other way round won't work.
[snip]
You could also go from mp3 320 to mp3 160 (gaining disk space
but losing quality). But
7 matches
Mail list logo
