Re: very slow usb 2.0

L.V.Gandhi wrote: > On 9/27/05, *Colin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Roberto Winter wrote: > > someone once told me that not having the modules would make my kernel > > faster... is that not true? > > That is NOT true. My rule of thumb is compile th

Re: very slow usb 2.0

On 9/27/05, Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Roberto Winter wrote:> someone once told me that not having the modules would make my kernel> faster... is that not true?That is NOT true.  My rule of thumb is compile the things I need at startup into the kernel and everything else as modules. I had a p

Re: very slow usb 2.0

Roberto Winter wrote: > someone once told me that not having the modules would make my kernel > faster... is that not true? That is NOT true. My rule of thumb is compile the things I need at startup into the kernel and everything else as modules. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: very slow usb 2.0

ok, just for the record: removed the "ub" module from the kernel and now I copied the same 698MB file in one and a half minutes! great. thanks a lot, another problem solved. linux rocks. roberto On 9/25/05, John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know of that the kernel is faster if you don'

Re: very slow usb 2.0

yeah, I found this: (here: http://www.lugod.org/mailinglists/archives/vox-tech/2005-08/msg00024.html) To blacklist a module I believe you just add it to /etc/hotplug/blacklist.  But in the case of ub vs. usb-storage, simply blacklisting or hiding the ub module won't do.  You actually have to rebuil

Re: very slow usb 2.0

I don't know of that the kernel is faster if you don't use modules, I seriously doubt its true and for your case it would work much better -- the module is only loaded once and then its in memory. on Sunday 09/25/2005 Roberto Winter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > yeah, I found this: (here: > http://

Re: very slow usb 2.0

Am Sonntag, 25. September 2005 22:26 schrieb Roberto Winter: > First of all I do have hci-hcd, ehci-hcd, and usb-storage compiled in the > kernel. Not as modules though, but that doesn't make a difference. > The thing is that I also hav UB compiled and it is not a module, so I can't > simply unload

Re: very slow usb 2.0

Hi! Thanks a lot for the prompt reply. First of all I do have hci-hcd, ehci-hcd, and usb-storage compiled in the kernel. Not as modules though, but that doesn't make a difference. The thing is that I also hav UB compiled and it is not a module, so I can't simply unload it. Is there a way to tell th

Re: very slow usb 2.0

Am Sonntag, 25. September 2005 15:28 schrieb John covici: > OK, possibly stupid question -- how do I prevent that driver from > being used when the hot plug subsystem would normally use it -- and if > I do prevent that will I mount /dev/sda,b,c ... instead? I have not > noticed a slowdown, but I d

Re: very slow usb 2.0

OK, possibly stupid question -- how do I prevent that driver from being used when the hot plug subsystem would normally use it -- and if I do prevent that will I mount /dev/sda,b,c ... instead? I have not noticed a slowdown, but I didn't test very much either. on Sunday 09/25/2005 Hendrik Sattl

Re: very slow usb 2.0

Roberto Winter wrote: > ub(1.19): GetMaxLUN returned 0, using 1 LUNs > uba: uba1 Do NOT use the ub driver! Use the usb-storage driver instead. The ub driver is not meant for high-performance and it IS the cause of your problem. HS -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.h

very slow usb 2.0

Hi there, I have been looking around to solve this, but no one else seems to have had any similar roblems. The thing is that I have an external hard drive and it takes forever to copy files from/to it. Since it is USB2 there is something awfully wrong. I tested it on macosx and windoze and it work