Re: vi - wraplen found

2001-01-22 Thread D-Man
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:16:27PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote: [snip] | | one feature I was never able to make work exactly like I want to is | autoindent... (the C autoindent which is supposed to be smart). Have you tried :set cindent ? 'autoindent' simply maintains the indentation level, ci

Re: vi - wraplen found

2001-01-21 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > *shrug* Depends what you like. I have to use all sorts of random vi > clones at work. The ones on the various commercial Unices are pretty > much original vi, and while I can use them well enough for simple tasks > like configuration file editing they'd d

Re: vi - wraplen found

2001-01-21 Thread Colin Watson
Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well I found the "set wraplen" feature I was talking about in another >thread and I checked on what vi clone I'm using. I'm using nvi which I >was not aware of since I've been using Debian. > >Well I think "nvi" is more close to the historical "vi" than "vim

Re: vi - wraplen found

2001-01-21 Thread Erik Steffl
Bud Rogers wrote: > > On Sunday 21 January 2001 12:47, Rino Mardo wrote: > > > Well I think "nvi" is more close to the historical "vi" than "vim" or > > others. Someone correct me if I'm wrong as looking at vim it seems > > it's bloated and it doesn't feel "vi"-like. Comments, suggestions > > ar

Re: vi - wraplen found

2001-01-21 Thread Bud Rogers
On Sunday 21 January 2001 12:47, Rino Mardo wrote: > Well I think "nvi" is more close to the historical "vi" than "vim" or > others. Someone correct me if I'm wrong as looking at vim it seems > it's bloated and it doesn't feel "vi"-like. Comments, suggestions > are welcome for the list members be

vi - wraplen found

2001-01-21 Thread Rino Mardo
Well I found the "set wraplen" feature I was talking about in another thread and I checked on what vi clone I'm using. I'm using nvi which I was not aware of since I've been using Debian. Well I think "nvi" is more close to the historical "vi" than "vim" or others. Someone correct me if I'm wron