Re: what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-18 Thread Matthew Dalton
Dan Jacobson wrote: I have two CDROM drives. This is apparently not noticed upon debian woody installation. Swifteax. Neateaux. I suppose the distributions of the pros consider that a personal issue or something. I think you're being paranoid. OK, so I must do this myself. OK, I make

Re: what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-18 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:07:11PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: Also what is the importance of noauto in fstab? Doesn't that just cause the user to have to issue a mount command if he hasn't since last reboot, and ha wants to use the cdrom? Not exactly. It prevents the system from attempting

Re: what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-18 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:51:33PM +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote: There's no need to make the symlink in order to get things to work. There's also no need for a new directory, unless you want to mount both cdroms at the same time. You can also do without the fstab entry. Try: 'mount -t iso9660

Re: what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-18 Thread Joachim Fahnenmueller
Hi Dan, On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:07:11PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: ( ... ) Swifteax. Neateaux. Are these words, and if so, what do they mean? OK, so I must do this myself. OK, I make a link in /dev from hdd to cdrom2 then I make a directory in /, then I make a entry in /etc/fstab. Is

what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-17 Thread Dan Jacobson
I have two CDROM drives. This is apparently not noticed upon debian woody installation. Swifteax. Neateaux. I suppose the distributions of the pros consider that a personal issue or something. OK, so I must do this myself. OK, I make a link in /dev from hdd to cdrom2 then I make a directory in

Re: what if I have a 2nd cdrom drive?

2002-06-17 Thread Michel Loos
Em Seg, 2002-06-17 às 02:07, Dan Jacobson escreveu: I have two CDROM drives. This is apparently not noticed upon debian woody installation. Swifteax. Neateaux. I suppose the distributions of the pros consider that a personal issue or something. OK, so I must do this myself. OK, I make a