will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
>> If you're not using NFS or NIS then you can safely remove it. Those are
>> the 2 main services that need it.
>>
>> Don't use update-rc.d remove, though. If you ever upgrade your system
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:59:40AM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> i spoze i should've been more clear--
>
> is there a debian-friendly way to permanently disable
> a startup (/etc/init.d/*) service so's some future
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" doesn't resurrect it from the grave?
>
>
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:51:37PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:00:29AM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> > is there a DEBIAN-happy way to permanently remove an
> > /etc/init.d/* service? this wholesale 'rm' stuff sounds hacky
> > for such a streamlined apt-friendly distrib
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:00:29AM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> > > What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
> > >update-rc.d remove it?
> >
> >
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> > What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
> > update-rc.d remove it?
>
> If you're not using NFS or NIS then you can safely remove it. Those are
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
>update-rc.d remove it?
If you're not using NFS or NIS then you can safely remove it. Those are
the 2 main services that need it.
Don't use update-rc.d remove, though.
What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
update-rc.d remove it?
-V.Suresh. Sureshvuserssourceforgenet
Http://www16.brinkster.com/vsuresh
--
---Powered by Debian Potato---
8:10pm up 3 min, 2 users, load average: 0.03,
7 matches
Mail list logo
