On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:17:49AM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
} --- Joerg Rossdeutscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
[...]
} > When I fake my browserID with mozilla via Prefbar-extension, one of the
} > lines above gives the faked ID, while the other one _always_ says
} > "Mozilla". Tested j
--- Joerg Rossdeutscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Am Mo, 2003-09-08 um 02.12 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
> > How else would they ID a browser? The site I have personally had problems
> with
> > (I've posted about it here a few times already) apparently identifies the
> > browser with some rea
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:38:53PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am Mi, 2003-09-10 um 00.42 schrieb Travis Crump:
> > Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > > document.write(navigator.appCodeName+"");
> > > document.write(navigator.appName+"");
> > > document.write(navigator.appVersion+"");
> > > doc
* Jean-Michel besnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030909 12:47]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:00:28PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 23.44 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
Am Mi, 2003-09-10 um 00.42 schrieb Travis Crump:
> Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > document.write(navigator.appCodeName+"");
> > document.write(navigator.appName+"");
> > document.write(navigator.appVersion+"");
> > document.write(navigator.userAgent+"");
> >
> >
> > When I fake my browserID with
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:26:23 +0200,
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:58:21AM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
> > wrote:> There are st
Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
Am Mo, 2003-09-08 um 02.12 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
How else would they ID a browser? The site I have personally had problems with
(I've posted about it here a few times already) apparently identifies the
browser with some really slick trick, since it goes out as hidden
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0700, Jean-Michel besnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:00:28PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 23.44 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > > > Am
At 2003-09-09T19:00:28Z, Joerg Rossdeutscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Whoa, sure it's interesting. Consider a man-in-the-middle SSL attack: now
>> somebody else owns everything you have.
> I always thought with a SSL-connection the man in the middle just gets
> useless "binary trash"? Am I
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:00:28PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am So, 2003-09-07 um 23.44 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > > > You probably don't even get security fixe
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:00:28PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am So, 2003-09-07 um 23.44 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > > > You probably don't even get
Am Mo, 2003-09-08 um 02.12 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
> How else would they ID a browser? The site I have personally had problems with
> (I've posted about it here a few times already) apparently identifies the
> browser with some really slick trick, since it goes out as hidden data in the
> POST fo
Hi,
Am So, 2003-09-07 um 23.44 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > > You probably don't even get security fixes fo NS 4 anymore!
> >
> > Uninteresting, since one would use NS4 only
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:58:21AM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> There are still uses for NS4. I know of a proprietary java app, that
>> works only with Java-1.1 and thus only with NS4 or IE.
>>
>> This is neede
--- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > > > > A lot of banks here in germany allow online banking for linux only
> with
> > > > > netscape 4.
> > > >
> > > > I've never seen one.
> > >
> > > Mine. :-)
> >
> > Mine too. Check out www.usalliance.org
> Then spoof the user-agent
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:48:02 +0200, Christophe Courtois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I thought one of the points of open source [Ok, it is not open
> source, but free] was that a project was never dead, and that you upgrade
> when YOU want.
Netscsape is not free software.
> So, why not
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 23:55, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> Joerg Rossdeutscher writes:
> > Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > > On Son, 2003-09-07 at 21:05, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > >
> > > > A lot of banks here in germany allow online banking for linux only with
> > > > netsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:58:21AM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> There are still uses for NS4. I know of a proprietary java app, that works
> only with Java-1.1 and thus only with NS4 or IE.
>
> This is needed to access a law database at my
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:09:46PM +0200, Alexander Mikhailian wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
>> in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
>> for testing?
> Netscape 4 is dead. Move on alrea
Joerg Rossdeutscher writes:
> Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > On Son, 2003-09-07 at 21:05, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> >
> > > A lot of banks here in germany allow online banking for linux only with
> > > netscape 4.
> >
> > I've never seen one.
>
> Mine. :-)
Min
--- Jose Mirles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:47 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi?:
> > >
> > > Try https://mypay.dfas.mil/
On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:47 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi?:
> >
> > Try https://mypay.dfas.mil/ , where I access my payroll info. From
> > *nix it _only_
Alexander Mikhailian wrote:
I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
for testing?
Netscape is based on mozilla, so install that instead. Mozilla has
options to stop pop-up ads, but netscape has n
--- "Daniel B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > ..
> > The number of websites that work in mozilla but fail in netscape 4 is
> > about 10 to 1 ...
>
> Huh?
>
> The number of websites that work in Mozilla but fail in Netscape 4 is
> one measurement. What's the other o
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> ..
> The number of websites that work in mozilla but fail in netscape 4 is
> about 10 to 1 ...
Huh?
The number of websites that work in Mozilla but fail in Netscape 4 is
one measurement. What's the other one? (You need two things to be
able to say there's a 10-to-1 rati
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:47:31 +0100,
"Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi?:
>
> > Try https://mypay.dfas.mil/ , where
--- "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Some browsers (Konqueror, Opera) allow specifying an arbitrary
> user-agent string, including several preconfigured strings to
> impersonate other browsers. This works for the vast majority of
> sites whose designers are stupi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:47:31PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> IIRC lynx has rudimentary frames support. lynx-ssl supports SSL.
lynx is sort of last resort. You want elinks or elinks-ssl.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'
on Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi?:
> Try https://mypay.dfas.mil/ , where I access my payroll info. From *nix it
> _only_ works in Netscape 4.x. I have gone around and around for some time on
>
on Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:09:46PM +0200, Alexander Mikhailian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
> in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
> for testing?
Noteing without repeating that NS 4 is non-
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:46:02PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> > You probably don't even get security fixes fo NS 4 anymore!
>
> Uninteresting, since one would use NS4 only with the bank's site. They
> don't need to hack me. They own ev
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi?:
> > They can always run lynx or dillo :)
>
> Not if they want frames and SSL (at least as far lynx goes, I don't
> know about dillo).
Try w3m, which does both. (Hit shift-F to re
--- Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> I do *not* have this problem bringing up that URL under both:
>
>Konqueror v3.1.3
>Mozilla v1.4-3
>
> Of course, I do not have a logon, so I cannot test main program
> functionality; but, I successfully browsed to FAQ, About, Cont
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:09:07:21:39:59+0200] scribed:
> --- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > > For some people who are used to it and won't change
> > > For some badly coded enterprise websites...
> >
> > The number of websites that work in mozilla but fail i
On Son, 2003-09-07 at 21:46, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Mine. :-)
Hm, where I live in D there's no shortage of banks to choose from. I
need only personal stuff though, and obviously don't know you needs :)
May I ask which braindead bank this is, so I can avoid them?
> Uninteresting, since one
Hello
Arnt Karlsen (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:48:02 +0200,
> Christophe Courtois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Le Dimanche 7 Septembre 2003 17:51, Stefan Waidele jun. a déclamé :
>> > Well, first I ask myself: Why would anyone use Nets
Roberto writes:
> I can see that, but I was under the impression that Netscape
> Communications actually released all the source code under the NPL. Is
> this wrong? Did they only release part of it?
They released all of the parts that they wrote. Unfortunately, they used
some proprietary libra
Am So, 2003-09-07 um 21.11 schrieb Mario Vukelic:
> On Son, 2003-09-07 at 21:05, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
>
> > A lot of banks here in germany allow online banking for linux only with
> > netscape 4.
>
> I've never seen one.
Mine. :-)
Gnucash would run also, so I don't blame them. But I don't
--- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > For some people who are used to it and won't change
> > For some badly coded enterprise websites...
>
> The number of websites that work in mozilla but fail in netscape 4 is
> about 10 to 1 in my experience. I haven't really seen any pages
On Son, 2003-09-07 at 21:05, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> A lot of banks here in germany allow online banking for linux only with
> netscape 4.
I've never seen one. If it happened to me, I'd take my business
elsewhere and made sure they know why. You probably don't even get
security fixes fo NS 4
Hi,
Am So, 2003-09-07 um 19.34 schrieb Paul Johnson:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:09:46PM +0200, Alexander Mikhailian wrote:
> > I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
> > in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
> > for testing?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:41:46PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> The number of websites that work in mozilla but fail in netscape 4 is
> about 10 to 1 in my experience. I haven't really seen any pages that
> work in netscape 4 but not in mozilla, but
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> Le Dimanche 7 Septembre 2003 17:51, Stefan Waidele jun. a d?clam? :
> > Well, first I ask myself: Why would anyone use Netscape 4?
>
> For some people who are used to it and won't change
> For some badly coded enterprise webs
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> Le Dimanche 7 Septembre 2003 17:51, Stefan Waidele jun. a d?clam? :
> > Since not even the company that made it supports yesterdays browser,
> > why should the 'next generation' of Debian?
>
> I thought one of the points of op
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:48:02 +0200,
Christophe Courtois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Dimanche 7 Septembre 2003 17:51, Stefan Waidele jun. a déclamé :
> > Well, first I ask myself: Why would anyone use Netscape 4?
>
> For some people who are used to it and won't
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> I thought one of the points of open source [Ok, it is not open source,
> but free] was that a project was never dead, and that you upgrade when
> YOU want.
Netscape isn't open-source, and isn't free. It was never in Debian,
Le Dimanche 7 Septembre 2003 17:51, Stefan Waidele jun. a déclamé :
> Well, first I ask myself: Why would anyone use Netscape 4?
For some people who are used to it and won't change
For some badly coded enterprise websites...
> Numbers have arrived at 7.1 and there is Mozilla as a free alternati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:09:46PM +0200, Alexander Mikhailian wrote:
> I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
> in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
> for testing?
Netscape 4 is dea
Alexander Mikhailian wrote:
I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
for testing?
Well, first I ask myself: Why would anyone use Netscape 4?
Numbers have arrived at 7.1 and there is Mozilla as a
I recently upgraded to testing and found out that netscape 4 is missing
in the list of packages. Where can I get a working version of netscape 4
for testing?
--
Sam Lowry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
50 matches
Mail list logo
