%% "Paul Akkermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pa> I have installed Debian(from a distribution cd) on my Pentium 2
pa> and I am wondering how I can see which version of gcc I have
pa> installed on my system. Can anybody tell me how I can see this and
pa> how to upgrade this (if this is po
Hello Paul,
Just open a terminal (shell, command prompt, whatever you call it),
and type:
gcc --version
And you will be told :)
If you get an error message you probably haven't installed a compiler
yet. In that case
apt-get install gcc
will perform a miracle ;)
Paul Akkermans wrote:
Hi everyone,
> Paul Akkermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-01 17:35]:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have installed Debian(from a distribution cd) on my Pentium 2 and
> I am wondering how I can see which version of gcc I have installed
gcc --version
man 'something' is always a good source of information.
wbr,
Lukas
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:31:25PM +0200, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> I have installed Debian(from a distribution cd) on my Pentium 2 and I am wondering
> how I can see which version of gcc I have installed on my system. Can anybody tell
> me how I can see this and how to upgrade this (if this is pos
Hi everyone,
I have installed Debian(from a distribution
cd) on my Pentium 2 and I am wondering how I can see which version of gcc I
have installed on my system. Can anybody tell me how I can see this and how to
upgrade this (if this is possible).
Thanks in advance,
Paul Akkermans
r the entire
thing just interpreted through ld
$ /lib/ld-2.3.2.so `which gcc` test.c
> > Personally, I'd tend to think that once they're in, all bets are off
> > and locking down the C compiler is the least of your problems.
>
> Exactly.
Indeed - attempting to lock d
Davor Balder wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:54:21AM -0500, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
Should I be using GCC 3.x for building kernels on Woody? I'm using 2.95
and I keep getting errors like undefined symbols and modules not being
built or installed. I've tried both 'make-kpkg kernel-image' and
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:54:21AM -0500, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> Should I be using GCC 3.x for building kernels on Woody? I'm using 2.95
> and I keep getting errors like undefined symbols and modules not being
> built or installed. I've tried both 'make-kpkg kernel-image' and the
> standard 'ma
Should I be using GCC 3.x for building kernels on Woody? I'm using 2.95
and I keep getting errors like undefined symbols and modules not being
built or installed. I've tried both 'make-kpkg kernel-image' and the
standard 'make dep && make clean && make bzImage && make modules && make
modules_inst
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:06:44PM +0930, David Purton wrote:
>
> just a quick question, but which gcc should I have installed?
>
>
>
> gcc
> gcc-2.95
> gcc-3.00
gcc is a set of links to gcc-2.95. They are installed together
currently. The gcc-3.0 package is only for t
DP> just a quick question, but which gcc should I have installed?
DP> gcc
DP> gcc-2.95
DP> gcc-3.00
DP> or all of the above?
Normally you should have gcc. This package installs 'gcc' binary which
is actually just frontend to real compilators. gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0
s
just a quick question, but which gcc should I have installed?
gcc
gcc-2.95
gcc-3.00
or all of the above?
does gcc-2.95 and 3.00 replace gcc?
if so - will removing gcc break things?
I'm running Woody, but don't do any major building - the odd app from
source, a kernel, and a
12 matches
Mail list logo
