Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/10/2012 11:08 AM, Doug wrote: > All of that is quite correct, but it neglects one parameter: if the > RF connection depends on directional antennas, which it will > for any reasonable distance--say 1/2 mile or more--then wind may > become a significant effect if it causes the antennas to jigg

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-10 Thread Doug
On 08/10/2012 12:52 AM, Kelly Clowers wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:00 AM, lina wrote: On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannister wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote: I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I guess it's okay. But from m

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-10 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 schrieb Darac Marjal: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > > > from one server to another server. > > > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, > > but in my situations rsync has

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-10 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 schrieb Johannes Wiedersich: > On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote: > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > > > from one server to another server. > > > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, > > but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess t

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-09 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:00 AM, lina wrote: > > On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannister wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote: >>> I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I >>> guess it's okay. >>> >>> But from my side, the wireless is not

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:00:12AM +0800, lina wrote: > > I don't know how to check the signal strength except seeing the icon of the > network manager. Sorry, I don't use "network manager", but you could check by going inside to test. The reason the transfer speeds could be slow, is because o

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-09 Thread lina
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote: >> I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I >> guess it's okay. >> >> But from my side, the wireless is not stable. >> I don't know how to let it stable. I mean

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote: > I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I > guess it's okay. > > But from my side, the wireless is not stable. > I don't know how to let it stable. I mean, not login every 10~15 minutes. > (btw, Is big wind affect

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:14:50 +0800, lina wrote: > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. Are both hosts remote (over Internet) or local (LAN)? > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, but in my situations rsync has > elapsed for 1 hour, I guess

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Johann Spies
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote: > > BTW, How to set the port for netcat? > The remote one has the following ports open: Choose one not from that list above 1024 and make sure any firewalls between the two computers allow that. See the following examples: http://www.screena

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread lina
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, >> >> from one server to another server. >> >> I checked that rsync is faster than scp, >> but in my situations rsync has elapsed

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread lina
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote: >> It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, >> >> from one server to another server. >> >> I checked that rsync is faster than scp, >> but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the ne

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread lina
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Johann Spies wrote: > Hallo Lina, > > >> It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, >> >> from one server to another server. > > You can also use netcat (man nc - see under examples). It is probably > the fastest method. > > I have used that in the past in combi

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread lina
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote: > lina: >> >> It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, >> >> from one server to another server. > > Either use rsync without encryption (= not tunneled over SSH), or pipe > tar through netcat. The latter does not support resuming. Thanks

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Darac Marjal
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote: > Hi, > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, > but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network > is also a problem, > > He

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote: > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, > but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network > is also a problem, > > Here I wish to know are there some

RE: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Tóth Tibor Péter
I user rsync for everything. rsync -vaP /location/ user@remote-host:/location/ I've found it best sofar. -Original Message- From: Johann Spies [mailto:jsp...@sun.ac.za] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 9:59 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: which one is faster?

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Johann Spies
Hallo Lina, > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. You can also use netcat (man nc - see under examples). It is probably the fastest method. I have used that in the past in combination with rsync: copy it using netcat and check the result with

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:14 AM, lina wrote: > Hi, > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, Well, sometimes. Certainly if you have some of the data in both places and need to sync it, rsync will just do

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
lina: > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. Either use rsync without encryption (= not tunneled over SSH), or pipe tar through netcat. The latter does not support resuming. If you can tell us a bit more, we might be able to help better. Do you

Re: which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread Raffaele Morelli
2012/8/8 lina > Hi, > > It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, > > from one server to another server. > > I checked that rsync is faster than scp, > but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network > is also a problem > split (man split) your data into little chunck

which one is faster?

2012-08-08 Thread lina
Hi, It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T, from one server to another server. I checked that rsync is faster than scp, but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network is also a problem, Here I wish to know are there some tools (better default) can use for fast tra