Andrew Sackville-West writes:
> apt-get install schnauzer
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> E: Couldn't find package schnauzer
The dog is non-free due to patents. You have to have a license from
Pfizer.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUB
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:35:30PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Note that I have no bias regarding kong and iceweasel.
>
> Also, I'm more than willing to embrace a counter example. OpenBSD has
> had two remote holes in the base install in more than 10 years. And
> I'm willing to wager
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:36:36AM -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> And, obviously, if security is your only standard, my pet schnauzer is a
can the dog block popups?
apt-get install schnauzer
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't
And, obviously, if security is your only standard, my pet schnauzer is a
better browser than either of these. Functionality must come into play
as well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we're getting off track of my original point and rather than continue
this festival of delights ;) I am going restate my original statement
and attempt to demonstrate one more time what I meant originally. And
then I'll be done. I'm sure you will either accept what I've said or
counter it, but eit
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:49:41AM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
Anyhow, the basic fact that there is fewer security alerts in Konq makes
this a more secure browser, whether thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/07 23:05, Erik Persson wrote:
[snip]
> As long as nobody is interested in exploiting the konq bugs and everyone
> wants to exploit the firefox bugs, I will be more secure using konq even
> if there are more flaws in konq. Security when using a
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:49:41AM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
>>> Anyhow, the basic fact that there is fewer security alerts in Konq makes
>>> this a more secure browser, whether this maybe is because o
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/07 15:52, Erik Persson wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
or links2.
I'm curious as
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
Anyhow, the basic fact that there is fewer security alerts in Konq makes
this a more secure browser, whether this maybe is because only of a smaller
user base or not.
I'm sorry, and i hate to argue wit
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Erik Persson wrote:
> Anyhow, the basic fact that there is fewer security alerts in Konq makes
> this a more secure browser, whether this maybe is because only of a smaller
> user base or not.
I'm sorry, and i hate to argue with people, but this last st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/07 15:52, Erik Persson wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>> It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
>> requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
>> or links2.
>>
>> I'm curious as to why
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
or links2.
I'm curious as to why this is. Does anyone have any ideas?
I'm on dialup and switched to Konq for this very reason b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/07 14:01, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Douglas.
>>
>> Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
>> > It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
>> > requiring updates fa
On 7/26/07, Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Douglas.
Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
> It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
> requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
> or links2.
Aside from the fact that one softwa
John Hasler wrote:
Doug writes:
It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues requiring
updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror or links2.
I'm curious as to why this is. Does anyone have any ideas?
How many people are looking for holes in Konq or Li
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:06:11PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:13:48PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> > Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
> > > It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
> > > requiring updates far more frequently than o
Hi Douglas.
Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 20:06:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:13:48PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
>>> It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
>>> requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Kon
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:13:48PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
> > It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
> > requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
> > or links2.
>
> Aside from the fact that one
Hi Douglas.
Douglas Allan Tutty, 26.07.2007 18:23:
> It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
> requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
> or links2.
Aside from the fact that one software really can be more secure than another one
is this the
Doug writes:
> It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues requiring
> updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror or links2.
> I'm curious as to why this is. Does anyone have any ideas?
How many people are looking for holes in Konq or Links2?
--
John Ha
It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues
requiring updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror
or links2.
I'm curious as to why this is. Does anyone have any ideas?
I'm on dialup and switched to Konq for this very reason but sometimes I
have a website
22 matches
Mail list logo
