AW: debarchiver and ehterconf problem at apt-get dist-upgrade woody to testing

ehterconf problem at apt-get dist-upgrade woody to testing W)ireless W)inds Support wrote: > i have two problems. Both are coming with apt-get dist-upgrade. I only > want to update the system from woody to sarge. All packages, without > debarchiver and etherconf, are installed correctly.

Re: debarchiver and ehterconf problem at apt-get dist-upgrade woody to testing

W)ireless W)inds Support wrote: > i have two problems. Both are coming with apt-get dist-upgrade. I only > want to update the system from woody to sarge. All packages, without > debarchiver and etherconf, are installed correctly. > > The problems: > > debarchiver: the install progress stops afte

debarchiver and ehterconf problem at apt-get dist-upgrade woody to testing

Hi everybody, i have two problems. Both are coming with apt-get dist-upgrade. I only want to update the system from woody to sarge. All packages, without debarchiver and etherconf, are installed correctly. The problems: debarchiver: the install progress stops after “Setting up debarchiver (0.1.1

Re: Moving from stable(Woody) to testing(Sarge)...

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:09:35 -0500 Terry Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a complete newbie to Debian, but also a complete convert. I have been > using RH and Mandrake for quite a while but have no experience with dpkg. > > So, please excuse my ignorance, but how do I move my Woody install

Moving from stable(Woody) to testing(Sarge)...

I am a complete newbie to Debian, but also a complete convert. I have been using RH and Mandrake for quite a while but have no experience with dpkg. So, please excuse my ignorance, but how do I move my Woody installation (installed from cd and ftp) to the testing version, Sarge? Terry Gray Softw

Re: woody to testing

"mtsouk" == mtsouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mtsouk> Hi and thanks for answering. I know that the main problem mtsouk> of testing is the bugs :-) What I would like to know is mtsouk> how many bugs does testing have? I mean, are the bugs so mtsouk> many that you cannot work

Re: woody to testing

, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > Date: 12 Nov 2002 18:42:35 -0600 > From: Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: woody to testing > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:42:57 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "mtsouk&quo

Re: woody to testing

wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:10:17 -0500 > From: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: woody to testing > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:13:30 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >

Re: woody to testing

Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:42:35PM -0600, Shyamal Prasad wrote: >> 2.2.2 I believe (I don't run testing, and I don't use no skeenking KDE >> or GNOME so you don't have to trust me on that, but that is also the >> real reason I'm happy with Woody ;-) > > KDE3

Re: unstabe to testing [was: Re: woody to testing]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:36:49PM -0600, Gerald Livingston wrote: > Is it possible to slowly revert to testing from unstable by just > changing the sources.list and essentially having no upgraded packages > found until they have propagated down the tree? Yep. Just point your sources.list at test

Re: woody to testing

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:42:35PM -0600, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > 2.2.2 I believe (I don't run testing, and I don't use no skeenking KDE > or GNOME so you don't have to trust me on that, but that is also the > real reason I'm happy with Woody ;-) KDE3 is apparently not going enter sid until the Gr

Re: woody to testing

"mtsouk" == mtsouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mtsouk> I am considering of moving to testing as well. I want to mtsouk> ask a few questions before doing this: mtsouk> 1. What are the major benefits of testing? You get newer software. mtsouk> 2. What are the major problems

unstabe to testing [was: Re: woody to testing]

On a related note so I'm stealing the thread. On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:10:17 -0500 David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. Can I go back to woody after moving to testing? > > Not easily. Package downgrades aren't well supported. A couple of > people have tried to go back with varying degr

Re: woody to testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I am considering of moving to testing as well. > I want to ask a few questions before doing this: > > 1. What are the major benefits of testing? You get software that's substantially closer to the "bleeding edge", and is newer than the last stable Debian release. In th

Re: woody to testing

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote: > Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:17:00 -0500 > From: Matthew Daubenspeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: woody to testing > Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 20:30:27 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: woody to testing

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:17:00PM -0500, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:19:00PM +1100, Joyce, Matthew wrote: > > I am running Woody stable, and would like to move to testing, I know there > > are some documents, but I'm not really clear on what actually happens during > >

Re: woody to testing

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:19:00PM +1100, Joyce, Matthew wrote: > I am running Woody stable, and would like to move to testing, I know there > are some documents, but I'm not really clear on what actually happens during > the process ? - edit /etc/apt/sources.list and change all instances of 'wood

woody to testing

Hi, I am running Woody stable, and would like to move to testing, I know there are some documents, but I'm not really clear on what actually happens during the process ? Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]