On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:05:10 +1200 "Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>"apt-get update" THEN "apt-cache policy firmware-linux-nonfree"
I didn't copy the output because it was the same again. That being that:
firmware-linux-nonfree wasn't in the package list.
So, becau
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:08:09PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:14:15 +1200 "Chris Bannister
> >Looks like a problem with your mirror. Just to be sure, can you do:
> >apt-get update && apt-cache policy firmware-linux-nonfree
> Here tis:
>
> apt-cache policy && firmware-linux-n
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:14:15 +1200 "Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:31:47PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:28:52 +1200 "Chris Bannister
>> >What is output of:
>> >"apt-cache policy firmware-linux-nonfree"?
>>
>> Booted
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:31:47PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:28:52 +1200 "Chris Bannister
> >What is output of:
> >"apt-cache policy firmware-linux-nonfree"?
>
> Booted the lappy and my /etc/apt/sources.list contains:
>
> deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ testing main n
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 22:00:31 +1200 "Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:54:53PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:28:52 +1200 "Chris Bannister
>> cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>>
>> >It's a wheezy [testing] system a
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:54:53PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:28:52 +1200 "Chris Bannister
> cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>
> >It's a wheezy [testing] system and aptitude search firmware doesn't off
> >> me that package?
> >
> >Is the non-free entry in "/etc/a
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:28:52 +1200 "Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>It's a wheezy [testing] system and aptitude search firmware doesn't off
>> me that package?
>
>Is the non-free entry in "/etc/apt/sources.list" ?
I do
>
>i.e:
>tal% less /etc/apt/sources.list
>deb
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:03:11AM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:45:13 +0100 "Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com"
> suggested this:
>
> >If you haven't tried 'firmware-non-free', it may be in there, mine was.
>
> It's a wheezy [testing] system and aptitude search firmware doesn't o
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:45:13 +0100 "Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>If you haven't tried 'firmware-non-free', it may be in there, mine was.
It's a wheezy [testing] system and aptitude search firmware doesn't off
me that package?
Be well,
Charlie
--
** ** ** ** ** ** **
[QUOTE]I have installed all the firmware and other packages that might work I
think. If you have an idea about what I might have left out please
don't hesitate to say.
Thank you,
Charlie
--[/QUOTE]
If you haven't tried 'firmware-non-free', it may be in there, mine was.
--
Sent from FOSS (Free O
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:59:53 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:41:57 + (UTC) "Camaleón noela...@gmail.com"
> suggested this:
>>1/ Despite the warning on the PID, is the wireless connection still
>>available and working?
>
> Yes, it appears to pick it up on the second try as show
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:10:30 +0100 "Keith McKenzie km3...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>[QUOTE]Toshiba laptop with an Intel wireless adapter that I'm unable
>to get to work[/QUOTE]
>
>Is it dead or, maybe, it just needs some firmware to be installed.
I have installed all the firmware and other pac
[QUOTE]Toshiba laptop with an Intel wireless adapter that I'm unable to get to
work[/QUOTE]
Is it dead or, maybe, it just needs some firmware to be installed.
On 05/06/2012, Charlie wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:41:57 + (UTC) "Camaleón noela...@gmail.com"
> suggested this:
>
>>Okay, let'
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:41:57 + (UTC) "Camaleón noela...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>Okay, let's back to the warning message and the behaviour you get.
>Some questions:
>
>1/ Despite the warning on the PID, is the wireless connection still
>available and working?
Yes, it appears to pick it u
>>>
>>> bound to xxx.xxx.x.xxx -- renewal in 34212 seconds. cat:
>>> /var/run/wpa_supplicant.wlan1.pid: No such file or directory
>>
>>(...)
>>
>>Are you running Squeeze? If yes, it could be this bug:
>>
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:25:18 + (UTC) "Camaleón noela...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>> I get this message:
>>
>> Sometimes the connection fails and sometimes it continues on as here:
>>
>> bound to xxx.xxx.x.xxx -- renewal in 34212 seconds.
>&
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:46:19 +1000, ariestao wrote:
> I get this message:
>
> Sometimes the connection fails and sometimes it continues on as here:
>
> bound to xxx.xxx.x.xxx -- renewal in 34212 seconds.
> cat: /var/run/wpa_supplicant.wlan1.pid: No such file or director
I get this message:
Sometimes the connection fails and sometimes it continues on as here:
bound to xxx.xxx.x.xxx -- renewal in 34212 seconds.
cat: /var/run/wpa_supplicant.wlan1.pid: No such file or directory
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.2.2
Copyright 2004-2011 Internet Systems
18 matches
Mail list logo
