On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:08:30PM +0100, Claus Ladekj?r Wilson wrote:
Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to write to a
ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel, I get the message
'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
(If this is not a relevant
| Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to
| write to a
| ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel, I get the message
| 'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
| (If this is not a relevant place to ask - could someone advice
| where to go
| next then?)
I
Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to write to a
ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel, I get the message
'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
(If this is not a relevant place to ask - could someone advice where to go
next then?)
--
Hilsen
Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to
write to a ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel,
I get the message 'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
(If this is not a relevant place to ask - could someone advice
where to go next then?)
I read
Claus Ladekjær Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to write to a
ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel, I get the message
'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
Quick answer: never
Long answer:
Well it's able
. :)
Claus Ladekjær Wilson wrote:
Does anyone know how far the kernel build is from being able to write to a
ntfs-partition? Even though I do compile my own kernel, I get the message
'mount read-only' because ntfs is win2k+
(If this is not a relevant place to ask - could someone advice where to go
6 matches
Mail list logo
