On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:57:45PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:45:24AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > But since we only have ibritish and iamerican packages, I do not think
> > we can get icanadian package to check spel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:45:24AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> But since we only have ibritish and iamerican packages, I do not think
> we can get icanadian package to check spelling for Canada.
You could always go through a Canadian dictionary and ma
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:33:47AM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:40:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > I don't know, no, no, and yes. US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
> > > (when we're not doing -
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:10:15:18:27-0700] scribed:
> Incoming from Colin Watson:
> >
> > Try 'set charset=iso-8859-1' instead.
>
> That makes mutt mis-display foreign characters. I've since just
> commented out that variable.
I have this:
set charset="//TRANSLIT"
--
Best
Incoming from Colin Watson:
>
> Try 'set charset=iso-8859-1' instead.
That makes mutt mis-display foreign characters. I've since just
commented out that variable.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
- -
Incoming from Colin Watson:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:41:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> [...]
> > set charset=isolatin
>
> Where did that setting come from? I don't believe that's a valid MIME
Good question. Next? :-)
> character set name, nor something that the iconv character conversion
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:41:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Leandro Guimarïes Faria Corcete Dutra:
> > Em Qui, 2004-01-08 Ãs 15:45, s. keeling escreveu:
> > > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> > > Service. To view the original message content
Incoming from Paul Johnson:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:21:49AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > Oh! Canadian! And here the whole time I've been thinking, "California
> > needs its own dialect? Well, yeah, I guess they probably do."
>
> That's rather insulting to Canadians to compare them t
Incoming from Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra:
>
> Em Qui, 2004-01-08 Ã s 15:45, s. keeling escreveu:
> > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> > Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> > message. If the text doesn't display co
Looks like your encoding is broken yet...
Em Qui, 2004-01-08 Ãs 15:45, s. keeling escreveu:
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:25:27PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:21:49AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > Oh! Canadian! And here the whole time I've been thinking, "California
> > needs its own dialect? Well, yeah, I guess they probably do."
>
> That's rather insult
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:21:49AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> Oh! Canadian! And here the whole time I've been thinking, "California
> needs its own dialect? Well, yeah, I guess they probably do."
That's rather insulting to Canadians to compa
Incoming from Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra:
> See what arrives here, looks to me like it's broken:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=isolatin
> X-message-flag: You are infected with the Outlook Viral Transport Agent!
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2001.11/msg00128.htm
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 13:33 GMT, Bijan Soleymani penned:
>
> They might. But in general I think that in Canadian English there is a
> mix of American and British spelling and often both are acceptable.
> Of course you should be consistent, and not switch spellings in the
> middle of a sentence.
>
See what arrives here, looks to me like it's broken:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=isolatin
X-message-flag: You are infected with the Outlook Viral Transport Agent!
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ãs 20:16, s. keeling escreveu:
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Inter
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:40:58PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > I don't know, no, no, and yes. US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
> > (when we're not doing -mm-dd (iso). Are spelling dictionaries
> > affected by locale? Dunno.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> I don't know, no, no, and yes. US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
> (when we're not doing -mm-dd (iso). Are spelling dictionaries
> affected by locale? Dunno.
I think en_ca and en_uk
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:08:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > I don't know, no, no, and yes. US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
> > (when we're not doing -mm-dd (iso). Are spelling dictionaries
> > affected by locale? Dunno.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:31:44PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Leandro Guimarïes Faria Corcete Dutra:
> > Actually, since this is an *old* version, you'd be better upgrading to
> > at least testing if you *really* want to check if that's a bug first.
>
> Then shouldn't glibcbug an
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:24:01PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
>
> I don't know, no, no, and yes. US does mo/day/yr, we do day/mo/yr
> (when we're not doing -mm-dd (iso). Are spelling dictionaries
> affected by locale? Dunno.
Oi, the date format is endlessly confusing if you're American and y
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ãs 19:24, s. keeling escreveu:
> Incoming from Nano Nano:
> >
> > What features of en_CA distinguish it from en_US?
>
> Are spelling dictionaries
> affected by locale? Dunno.
Should be, as well as user interface text. Do you use more of British
or US vocabulary and g
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ãs 19:32, s. keeling escreveu:
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> disk, and then open it using a
Incoming from Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra:
> Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ã s 05:25, s. keeling escreveu:
> > What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
> > en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
> > that didn't do it. Once I edited /etc/locale.ge
Incoming from Nano Nano:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:25:46AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
> > en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
>
> What features of en_CA distinguish it from en_US?
> Is the currenc
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
> en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
> that didn't do it. Once I edited /etc/locale.gen and
> /etc/locale.alias, then ran locale-gen, it was finally fixed.
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ãs 05:25, s. keeling escreveu:
> What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
> en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
> that didn't do it. Once I edited /etc/locale.gen and
> /etc/locale.alias, then ran locale-gen, it was finally
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:25:46AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
> en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
What features of en_CA distinguish it from en_US?
Is the currency symbol "$" ?? Sort order different?
What a strange loop I've landed in. I started out trying to make
en_CA locale work. "dpkg-reconfigure locales" everybody said, but
that didn't do it. Once I edited /etc/locale.gen and
/etc/locale.alias, then ran locale-gen, it was finally fixed.
In /etc/locale.alias it says to use the glibcbug
28 matches
Mail list logo
