Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Wulfy wrote: Micha Feigin wrote: Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). Is gtk native to all Linux but KDE? Or is it just native

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:45:23PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: Micha Feigin wrote: wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot for doing plots. OK, this is getting over being just uninformed

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:45:23 -0400 Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Micha Feigin wrote: wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot for doing plots. OK, this is getting over being

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread John Hasler
Roberto C. Sanchez writes: First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. I know of no licensing issues with Qt. It is distributed under the GPL. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:27:38PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez writes: First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. I know of no licensing issues with Qt. It is distributed under the GPL. It is

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:27:38 -0500 John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez writes: First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. I know of no licensing issues with Qt. It is distributed under the

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:13:29 -0400 Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: If you want the best cross platform library, then I would argue that it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and probably other languages as well. It has the advantage of

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread David Baron
On Saturday 19 August 2006 05:51, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:13:29PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: If you want the best cross platform library, then I would argue that it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Wulfy
Micha Feigin wrote: Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). Is gtk native to all Linux but KDE? Or is it just native to GNOME? -- Blessings Wulfmann Wulf Credo: Respect the

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Cepl
Micha Feigin wrote: wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot for doing plots. OK, this is getting over being just uninformed partisan to real FUD -- before commenting on Qt get some

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:21:31PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). wxwidgets on the other hand has the limitations that it can only due the

wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread gustavo halperin
Hello I want write a cross platform user interface. I'm think about wxWidgets and gtkmm. What do you think about these libraries? What do you recommend to use, maybe a another library ?? Thank you, Gustavo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:59:48PM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote: Hello I want write a cross platform user interface. I'm think about wxWidgets and gtkmm. What do you think about these libraries? What do you recommend to use, maybe a another library ?? If you want the best cross

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Matej Cepl
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: If you want the best cross platform library, then I would argue that it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and probably other languages as well. It has the advantage of supporting something like a dozen different GUI toolkits and you get the

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:13:29PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: If you want the best cross platform library, then I would argue that it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and probably other languages as well. It has the advantage of supporting

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Jiann-Ming Su
On 8/18/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While I do not doubt that Qt is a good toolkit, I think that it suffers (to a certain extent) from the same problem as Java GUIs. That is, they look out of place pretty much everywhere. Huh???